Discussion RDNA4 + CDNA3 Architectures Thread

Page 227 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

DisEnchantment

Golden Member
Mar 3, 2017
1,777
6,785
136
1655034287489.png
1655034259690.png

1655034485504.png

With the GFX940 patches in full swing since first week of March, it is looking like MI300 is not far in the distant future!
Usually AMD takes around 3Qs to get the support in LLVM and amdgpu. Lately, since RDNA2 the window they push to add support for new devices is much reduced to prevent leaks.
But looking at the flurry of code in LLVM, it is a lot of commits. Maybe because US Govt is starting to prepare the SW environment for El Capitan (Maybe to avoid slow bring up situation like Frontier for example)

See here for the GFX940 specific commits
Or Phoronix

There is a lot more if you know whom to follow in LLVM review chains (before getting merged to github), but I am not going to link AMD employees.

I am starting to think MI300 will launch around the same time like Hopper probably only a couple of months later!
Although I believe Hopper had problems not having a host CPU capable of doing PCIe 5 in the very near future therefore it might have gotten pushed back a bit until SPR and Genoa arrives later in 2022.
If PVC slips again I believe MI300 could launch before it :grimacing:

This is nuts, MI100/200/300 cadence is impressive.

1655034362046.png

Previous thread on CDNA2 and RDNA3 here

 
Last edited:

Jan Olšan

Senior member
Jan 12, 2017
541
1,069
136
Reading between the lines of that AMD Q&A, RDNA4 really isn't quite ready yet (sounds like HW is so that leaves software).

NVidia is doing a January release, it sounds like AMD will be releasing later in the quarter.
May look like that but who knows ?
 

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,676
4,309
136
www.teamjuchems.com
From the article:


1736288122210.png



TPU chart is a little less optimistic than what the author of the little article surmises.

If AMD had a 9070XT that was a clear topper of the 7900XTX and were ready to drop it for $599 or so why wouldn't they just get it done with?

This seems like it would put it in contention with the new 5070 Ti performance wise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and Elfear

gaav87

Senior member
Apr 27, 2024
659
1,279
96
From the article:


View attachment 114451



TPU chart is a little less optimistic than what the author of the little article surmises.

If AMD had a 9070XT that was a clear topper of the 7900XTX and were ready to drop it for $599 or so why wouldn't they just get it done with?

This seems like it would put it in contention with the new 5070 Ti performance wise.
Im downloading we will se vs my oced 6800xt if i dont fall asleep il also test with 7800xt
 

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,676
4,309
136
www.teamjuchems.com
I think Radeon does better than typical in recent Call of Duty games. We have nothing else to go on but take it with the appropriate amount of salt.
I meant relative to CoD, in this case. I get what you are saying.

I don't own CoD (lol, I could find the cds for the first couple maybe :D ) or I would 7900xtx it.

Prevent a fire sale of their old RDNA3 stock?

How much is even left? It looks pretty drawn down. Why bother. Time to move on, the RDNA3 and RDNA2 stuff has been on sale forever and now's the time to strike as the positive vibes around B580 that were only marginally deserving show.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97