Discussion RDNA4 + CDNA3 Architectures Thread

Page 231 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

DisEnchantment

Golden Member
Mar 3, 2017
1,779
6,798
136
1655034287489.png
1655034259690.png

1655034485504.png

With the GFX940 patches in full swing since first week of March, it is looking like MI300 is not far in the distant future!
Usually AMD takes around 3Qs to get the support in LLVM and amdgpu. Lately, since RDNA2 the window they push to add support for new devices is much reduced to prevent leaks.
But looking at the flurry of code in LLVM, it is a lot of commits. Maybe because US Govt is starting to prepare the SW environment for El Capitan (Maybe to avoid slow bring up situation like Frontier for example)

See here for the GFX940 specific commits
Or Phoronix

There is a lot more if you know whom to follow in LLVM review chains (before getting merged to github), but I am not going to link AMD employees.

I am starting to think MI300 will launch around the same time like Hopper probably only a couple of months later!
Although I believe Hopper had problems not having a host CPU capable of doing PCIe 5 in the very near future therefore it might have gotten pushed back a bit until SPR and Genoa arrives later in 2022.
If PVC slips again I believe MI300 could launch before it :grimacing:

This is nuts, MI100/200/300 cadence is impressive.

1655034362046.png

Previous thread on CDNA2 and RDNA3 here

 
Last edited:

Gideon

Platinum Member
Nov 27, 2007
2,043
5,094
136
BTW Asus indeed did confirm RX 9070 non-XT is 16GB, thus the 12GB cut-down version might indeed be RX 9060 XT(X) which would be very good news:


Though It's essential AMD gets the pricing right. With a ~390mm die the SKU's manufacturing price is certainly closer to cut down Navi 31 (7900 XT / GRE) than to Navi 32.

BTW AMD also demoed their Real time path tracing + upscaling (the same the released a paper about last year). This should be an equivalent to Nvidia's DLSS 3 + Ray Reconstruction.


I hope someone posts a video / comments about it
 

SolidQ

Golden Member
Jul 13, 2023
1,531
2,520
106
This should be an equivalent to Nvidia's DLSS 3 + Ray Reconstruction.
As we see and know AMD going have RR and Neural Textures, but people already hooked by NV marketing

P.S Photo not very good quality, what is upper left screen? fps? :p
 

SolidQ

Golden Member
Jul 13, 2023
1,531
2,520
106
God, i hate guys like this. Ofc AMD not gonna show games for now, until RDNA4 event
93cf7ded5a3e537fd081f66b2a1361b8.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and Gideon

insertcarehere

Senior member
Jan 17, 2013
712
701
136
You can disable even only DOF, and it will turn to "Custom"
Well seeing as I don't have a copy of COD6 in front of me I don't really know what changes between an 'Extreme' preset and actual 'max settings' . The point being is that the 9070xt benchmark run may not be as comparable as we think due to whatever changes people have been doing to their benchmark runs.
 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
4,632
5,956
106
As we see and know AMD going have RR and Neural Textures, but people already hooked by NV marketing

P.S Photo not very good quality, what is upper left screen? fps? :p
Maybe AMD should have invested some time at their event for RDNA4 to market Neural Textures or (RDNA4 ITSELF) like NV did.
 

gdansk

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2011
4,691
7,932
136
if that real, what is there new? RT?
It has wandered into the land of ML, RT and it became fat.
Maybe AMD should have invested some time at their event for RDNA4 to market Neural Textures or (RDNA4 ITSELF) like NV did.
Maybe. But the negativity around Radeon is so high that they should always shut up until stuff is shipping.
 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
4,632
5,956
106
GB203 RTX 5080 is 377 mm². Why can't AMD match NV's PPA? Are NV's designs really dense?
 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
4,632
5,956
106
No idea why. But wouldn't you, as a product manager, cancel To Mega Navion if the reasonably sized part couldn't even match the RTX 4080?
so it was a cost and engineering problem that made rdna4 halo not worth making?
 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
4,632
5,956
106
That was heavy marketing RT/DLSS, but now if FSR4 good and RT also, what arguments for NV? aside specific Cuda for work
DLSS4?? Most of its features are coming to all RTX cards. Well the ones that matter anyway.

3d rendering is another one, a huge one for designers and engineers. Blender improvements will be big because of huge bandwidth increases
 
Last edited:

Thunder 57

Diamond Member
Aug 19, 2007
4,219
7,003
136
That was heavy marketing RT/DLSS, but now if FSR4 good and RT also, what arguments for NV? aside specific Cuda for work

RT was DoA on the 3050. And who needed DLSS when a 6600 was far more powerful at the same price?
 

SolidQ

Golden Member
Jul 13, 2023
1,531
2,520
106
And the halo effect. Their loss.
to be fair not all people, i know some people who was only NV, but now they more rational.

 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
4,632
5,956
106
I mean for gamers
for games, DLSS4. That new model looks good, of course more testing is needed. I'm not upgrading to any GPU either from AMD or NV thanks to DLSS4 support on 40 series. This was a calculated move from Nvidia.
 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
4,632
5,956
106
oh look neural rendering from MS themselves
 

insertcarehere

Senior member
Jan 17, 2013
712
701
136
RT was DoA on the 3050. And who needed DLSS when a 6600 was far more powerful at the same price?
Putting aside that 6600s were barely available outside the US for much of the past few years (think 2022/23). Nvidia is practically the only choice for CS Majors who need to learn programming with GPUs (and game a bit for R&R) . 6600 being 40% more powerful or whatever doesn't matter when RoCm is/was a tire fire.
 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
4,632
5,956
106
RDNA4 is capable of Neural rendering. Lets see if they release support for it next month