Discussion RDNA4 + CDNA3 Architectures Thread

Page 185 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

DisEnchantment

Golden Member
Mar 3, 2017
1,777
6,785
136
1655034287489.png
1655034259690.png

1655034485504.png

With the GFX940 patches in full swing since first week of March, it is looking like MI300 is not far in the distant future!
Usually AMD takes around 3Qs to get the support in LLVM and amdgpu. Lately, since RDNA2 the window they push to add support for new devices is much reduced to prevent leaks.
But looking at the flurry of code in LLVM, it is a lot of commits. Maybe because US Govt is starting to prepare the SW environment for El Capitan (Maybe to avoid slow bring up situation like Frontier for example)

See here for the GFX940 specific commits
Or Phoronix

There is a lot more if you know whom to follow in LLVM review chains (before getting merged to github), but I am not going to link AMD employees.

I am starting to think MI300 will launch around the same time like Hopper probably only a couple of months later!
Although I believe Hopper had problems not having a host CPU capable of doing PCIe 5 in the very near future therefore it might have gotten pushed back a bit until SPR and Genoa arrives later in 2022.
If PVC slips again I believe MI300 could launch before it :grimacing:

This is nuts, MI100/200/300 cadence is impressive.

1655034362046.png

Previous thread on CDNA2 and RDNA3 here

 
Last edited:

Shmee

Memory & Storage, Graphics Cards Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 13, 2008
8,129
3,067
146
I don't get all the hype for RT. I would rather have a good card like 7900XTX, without burning melty connector, affordable, and with 24GB of memory, and good performance.
 

Shmee

Memory & Storage, Graphics Cards Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 13, 2008
8,129
3,067
146
That doesn't make any sense.
 

Shmee

Memory & Storage, Graphics Cards Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 13, 2008
8,129
3,067
146
Ah I see what you are saying. Yeah, it's kind of stupid IMO, I would rather have high FPS, but to each their own I guess.
 

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,676
4,308
136
www.teamjuchems.com
Ah I see what you are saying. Yeah, it's kind of stupid IMO, I would rather have high FPS, but to each their own I guess.
FRAME GEN!!! BOOM!!!

lol, I kid. I hear you.

Personally I am invested in FreeSync premium, the overlays and all that. That’s right, I am here for Team Red for the drivers and UI. Every time I tip back into the Nvidia side their software and log in requires GeForce Xtreme Xperiwnce slaps me across the face. I know they do offer some sweet game profiles and DLSS is the cats meow but I just want a solid gui and raster performance for the games I play today.

And yes, I do get frustrated when the AMD drivers aren’t playing nice too.
 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
3,744
5,081
106
Every time I tip back into the Nvidia side their software and log in requires GeForce Xtreme Xperiwnce slaps me across the face
Ugh, I hated that. The new Nvidia is better but not as good as AMDs.

IMO, Nvidia has always been bad at app development, it’s always so clunky. Same with their website design.
 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
3,744
5,081
106
We're a wee bit over 6 years of RTRT hardware being in HVM.
Not in games but in 3D rendering, hardware RT has a huge been improvement. Nvidia is the standard for 3D work because of this.

For games, RT won't matter till becomes even more mainstream. $500 consoles need to have 4080 Super levels of RT perf and that won't happen till PS6.
 

misuspita

Senior member
Jul 15, 2006
722
876
136
Yeah, for once I'd like people calm the 🤡 down and stop the hype train from where they will step down inevitably disappointed.

You always overhype AMD products. Always. Every single product since ATI has been bought ended in a moonshot hype train
 

adroc_thurston

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2023
6,038
8,526
106
Not in games but in 3D rendering, hardware RT has a huge been improvement. Nvidia is the standard for 3D work because of this.
Not a particularly relevant market segment at all.
RTRT progress in games has been lukewarm at best.
 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
3,744
5,081
106
DLSS is the cats meow
Having used FSR2 and DLSS. AI based upscaling is much better, even XeSS is better than FSR2. It does make a difference to a lot of people. DLSS is what Intel and AMD need to beat, its mindshare is massive.
 

SolidQ

Golden Member
Jul 13, 2023
1,451
2,362
106
So how hard is it to break Nvidia's mindshare?
Software - That should be big priority, a lot people i see choose because software/Cuda
RoCm to be similar Cude and better
Better Media Engine
Upscaler same quality or better, than DLSS
Fix Idle Power
more Vram for good Price
 
  • Like
Reactions: poke01

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
3,744
5,081
106
Software - That should be big priority, a lot people i see choose because software/Cuda
RoCm to be similar Cude and better
Better Media Engine
Upscaler same quality or better, than DLSS
Fix Idle Power
Well put. Software and efficiency is key.

AMD already provides a lot of VRAM which is great, just need to work on the above.
 

SolidQ

Golden Member
Jul 13, 2023
1,451
2,362
106
AMD already provides a lot of VRAM which is great, just need to work on the above.
if AMD gonna start N48 with 500$ + FSR4/RT is good, that gonna take some market share from NV. Live that was with RV770 cheap, but very good perfomance

efficiency is key.
Some generation AMD is good with efficiency, some is NV