Discussion RDNA4 + CDNA3 Architectures Thread

Page 182 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

DisEnchantment

Golden Member
Mar 3, 2017
1,777
6,785
136
1655034287489.png
1655034259690.png

1655034485504.png

With the GFX940 patches in full swing since first week of March, it is looking like MI300 is not far in the distant future!
Usually AMD takes around 3Qs to get the support in LLVM and amdgpu. Lately, since RDNA2 the window they push to add support for new devices is much reduced to prevent leaks.
But looking at the flurry of code in LLVM, it is a lot of commits. Maybe because US Govt is starting to prepare the SW environment for El Capitan (Maybe to avoid slow bring up situation like Frontier for example)

See here for the GFX940 specific commits
Or Phoronix

There is a lot more if you know whom to follow in LLVM review chains (before getting merged to github), but I am not going to link AMD employees.

I am starting to think MI300 will launch around the same time like Hopper probably only a couple of months later!
Although I believe Hopper had problems not having a host CPU capable of doing PCIe 5 in the very near future therefore it might have gotten pushed back a bit until SPR and Genoa arrives later in 2022.
If PVC slips again I believe MI300 could launch before it :grimacing:

This is nuts, MI100/200/300 cadence is impressive.

1655034362046.png

Previous thread on CDNA2 and RDNA3 here

 
Last edited:

soresu

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2014
3,895
3,331
136
unless there is a UDNA Navi 53 waiting in the wings that can do it
UDNA will not be codenamed Navi going by what Kepler has said.

Probably Sirius based on this image would be my guess....

GaJD3qKWIAASCf7
 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
3,731
5,076
106
In the way that ROCm while still very flawed has come a long way since the last time the AMD GPU ecosystem was unified with Vega.
Well at this point its all hardware, hopefully RDNA4 RT/AI cores provide a good start
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97

ToTTenTranz

Senior member
Feb 4, 2021
456
842
136
Simply that they have put all pedals to the metal on UDNA roadmap.

The problem is they cut the RDNA4 lineup down to only 2 chips, supposedly to speed up the roadmaps. Yet what ended up happening was RDNA4 is only releasing in 2025 (meaning it probably got delayed a bunch of quarters), and UDNA is only releasing in 2026.


So what seems to have happened is we're getting all the downsides of cutting down the RDNA4 lineup (delayed release, no halo product, loss of mindshare, loss of competitiveness and Nvidia charging as much as they want on the high end) while not getting any upside at all because UDNA is still only slated to 2026.

And from the looks of it, UDNA is only coming in late 2026 (assuming it doesn't delay into 2027) so AMD will once again go almost 2 years without a new architecture and GPU lineup.
 

marees

Golden Member
Apr 28, 2024
1,249
1,803
96
The problem is they cut the RDNA4 lineup down to only 2 chips, supposedly to speed up the roadmaps. Yet what ended up happening was RDNA4 is only releasing in 2025 (meaning it probably got delayed a bunch of quarters), and UDNA is only releasing in 2026.


So what seems to have happened is we're getting all the downsides of cutting down the RDNA4 lineup (delayed release, no halo product, loss of mindshare, loss of competitiveness and Nvidia charging as much as they want on the high end) while not getting any upside at all because UDNA is still only slated to 2026.

And from the looks of it, UDNA is only coming in late 2026 (assuming it doesn't delay into 2027) so AMD will once again go almost 2 years without a new architecture and GPU lineup.
Inexplicable if they don't have a navi 31 replacement until 2027. That is almost PS6 time

I am hoping it will be there by 2025 end rather (aligning with xbox next)
 

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,676
4,308
136
www.teamjuchems.com
I think RDNA 4 being cut down to size was a combination of
  1. UDNA ambitions
  2. TSMC (packaging) constraints
  3. RDNA 3 being a misfire
All of this still doesn't explain why we don't have a monolithic Navi 49 that replaces Navi 31, unless there is a UDNA Navi 53 waiting in the wings that can do it
Signs point to RDNA4 being more of a og RDNA type release where we saw only the 5700XT and down and RDNA 2 showed their real ambitions/vision.

While it (RDNA1) was a big step over Vega it wasn’t “worth” having the upper versions of if they that would have delayed RDNA2 in the slightest.

Even more critical if UDNA is bringing a better AI feature set to all of their product lines, including Server & Professional.

I too want RDNA4 out soon, though. Let’s move on already!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97

GodisanAtheist

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2006
8,107
9,359
136
The problem is they cut the RDNA4 lineup down to only 2 chips, supposedly to speed up the roadmaps. Yet what ended up happening was RDNA4 is only releasing in 2025 (meaning it probably got delayed a bunch of quarters), and UDNA is only releasing in 2026.


So what seems to have happened is we're getting all the downsides of cutting down the RDNA4 lineup (delayed release, no halo product, loss of mindshare, loss of competitiveness and Nvidia charging as much as they want on the high end) while not getting any upside at all because UDNA is still only slated to 2026.

And from the looks of it, UDNA is only coming in late 2026 (assuming it doesn't delay into 2027) so AMD will once again go almost 2 years without a new architecture and GPU lineup.

-I figure that the Hardware is done, validated, and ready to rock but the software (not simply drivers, but maybe FSR 4.0) just isn't ready to roll yet.

AMD has realized a day late and dollar short as always that if you're not launching your new GPU hardware with a new GPU feature then no one is buying (esp if you're missing the Halo and Enthusiast segments).
 

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,676
4,308
136
www.teamjuchems.com
-I figure that the Hardware is done, validated, and ready to rock but the software (not simply drivers, but maybe FSR 4.0) just isn't ready to roll yet.

AMD has realized a day late and dollar short as always that if you're not launching your new GPU hardware with a new GPU feature then no one is buying (esp if you're missing the Halo and Enthusiast segments).

Oh man, that would destroy my AMD experience of getting a fresh new card and then dealing with mystery issues for at least a couple of months!

If true, the "best" part for them and everyone else would be that the containers of cards would be on the water right now - or already landed stateside - which means that they would have a solid launch free of any political shenanigans that might be coming in Q1/Q2.

I want one, so I am projecting a bit.
 

Timorous

Golden Member
Oct 27, 2008
1,966
3,850
136
I am so bored. Where is the false hype of a 5,000 GHz 1,024 WGP 128GB 7090 killer released q1 next year for $400 so we can do silly stuff like make up product stacks based on those outrageous claims and then be sad when AMD don't meet those expectations?
 

MrTeal

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,916
2,700
136
Think bigger, 42 GCDs, 42 TCDs on a single card but AMD have perfected xfire so they can sell you a 42 card stacked unit which can go into a 42 cabinet cluster. 42's all the way down.
42GB VRAM on a 448bit memory bus?