- Oct 14, 1999
- 509
- 0
- 0
(I have the blocks back now, as you'll see if you read on down. I'd delete the post, but IMHO, I made a couple of points worth noting) 
Well, the saga continues...
Now for the 3rd day in a row, I'm missing 50-70% of my RC5 WU's. I can understand once... I can tolerate twice... but when it reaches 3 days in a row and there's no concrete acknoledgement from D.Net that they even know anything is wrong, that's when I start to get a bit miffed.
Here's my solution... until I see credit for the blocks I'm missing, I'm not submitting any more. I know I'm not the worlds largest RC5 cracker, but I figure that a lot of folks might just do the same. Perhaps when they see the WU rates going into the royal crapper, they will figure out what's up.
I've got a couple of thousand blocks in the sneaker machine and a pProxy at work that I can set to an impossibly high flush threshold with a few keystrokes. I can wait it out and we'll just see who wins this little "staring contest".:disgust:
-Brian
Well, the saga continues...
Now for the 3rd day in a row, I'm missing 50-70% of my RC5 WU's. I can understand once... I can tolerate twice... but when it reaches 3 days in a row and there's no concrete acknoledgement from D.Net that they even know anything is wrong, that's when I start to get a bit miffed.
Here's my solution... until I see credit for the blocks I'm missing, I'm not submitting any more. I know I'm not the worlds largest RC5 cracker, but I figure that a lot of folks might just do the same. Perhaps when they see the WU rates going into the royal crapper, they will figure out what's up.
I've got a couple of thousand blocks in the sneaker machine and a pProxy at work that I can set to an impossibly high flush threshold with a few keystrokes. I can wait it out and we'll just see who wins this little "staring contest".:disgust:
-Brian