• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

RC5 help please

Wiz

Diamond Member
Help would be most humbly appreciated (new to RC5)

1. Is RC5 known to cause trouble with MSIE 5.5 on Win98 SE w/K62 500?
I can't run MSIE unless I turn off RC5! It gives "Invalid page fault" every time, through reboots etc..

2. How can I make sure RC5 is using as much free resources as possible under Win98 SE?
Two boxes running with this OS. Easy to up the priority on NT, 2K but how to do with W98?

Thanks,
 
1 - never seen that 😕

2 - from dnetc readme :
Q: I want to run the client at a higher priority than zero/idle.
This functionality was removed in some past version, but I *really*,
*really* need it or my other XXX program will simply hog the CPU.
What can I do?
A: It never went away. Only the help text said it did. 🙂
Hovever, be *very* careful. Windows' thread scheduling/priority
assignment is brain dead beyond belief. Read the text in the
config screen before you fiddle with the priority setting!

So go to the client config, Performance related options, line 3 :

Priority level to run at:

The higher the client's priority, the greater will be its demand for
processor time. The operating system will fulfill this demand only after
the demands of other processes with a higher or equal priority are fulfilled
first. At priority zero, the client will get processing time only when all
other processes are idle (give up their chance to run). At priority nine, the
client will always get CPU time unless there is a time-critical process
waiting to be run - this is obviously not a good idea unless the client is
running on a machine that does nothing else.
*Warning*: Running the Win32 client at any priority level other than zero is
destructive to Operating System safety. Win32's thread scheduler is not nice.
Besides, a zero priority does not mean that the client will run slower than at
a higher priority. It simply means that all other processes have a better
*chance* to get processor time than client. If none of them want/need processor
time, the client will get it. Do *not* change the value of this option unless
you are intimately familiar with the way Win32 thread scheduling works.


/edit : many ppl tried to run it at any higher priority, and never reported performance improvements higher than 1 or 2 percent. The downside being *very* slow system response : you can barely move the mouse !
 
Thanks LeBlatt, I'll leave it alone then.
I moved it up to "Normal" priority on my W2K boxes, but will leave it alone on the '98 boxes.
 
Back
Top