VirtualLarry
No Lifer
- Aug 25, 2001
- 56,570
- 10,202
- 126
I'd like to see some documentation on that, really, because my understanding was that laser diodes actually consume more power than LEDs. I could be wrong, it could depend completely on the efficiency of the "junction" in the material that they use, that converts current into light.Originally posted by: Mem
What I meant was laser technology has a lot more to offer for the future,IMHO I feel optical technology has reached its peak,sure you can improve specs on DPI and speed but it still uses the not so efficient way of reading/scanning with the LED compared to a laser which is more efficient & also uses less power(another plus point ,especially over cordless optical).
I'm also not quite sure what you mean by "not so efficient way of reading/scanning with the LED" - my understanding was that the sensor chip itself was basically the same, in terms of optical resolution and imaging scan rate.
I don't get it - why wouldn't a serious gamer use the best tools possible at their disposal?Originally posted by: Mem
As to hardcore gamer,how do you define a hardcore gamer?...I game everyday and have used both cordless and corded mice in my time,sure cordless use to be crap few years back but a lot has change since then,if you need a Diamondback mouse to be a good hardcore gamer then there`s something wrong with your gaming or you must have a very crappy mouse.
Although, if your point is that players are defined more by their skills than by their tools, I'll agree with you there. A friend of mine who is a hardcore UT player, was once playing online using the "secondary" machine at my place, which was slower and had a crappier mouse, and was still kicking some 'a' online. I was amazed, since that machine's specs generally caused UT to be a bit laggy in general.
Well, when playing, you *can* tell the difference, IMHO, in terms of input lag. Granted, if your local rendering of the shared 3D world updates fast and is lag-free, it doesn't matter if the network connection lags and you die because of it, but every bit helps.Originally posted by: Mem
Also on the USB 8ms polling rate,personally I think the ping latency with online gaming servers is more of a factor in gaming then the polling rate,since ping latency can vary quite a lot even on good servers(as any online gamer knows),however give credit where credit is due, Razer have tried to reduce the USB lag with the Diamondback,personally I`ve never had a problem with USB lag,server lag well that`s a different story.
I'm curious what the cause of that is - something to do with NV's USB drivers?Originally posted by: Mem
Two negative things I did read about on both mice ,one is there`s a known driver issue problem with the Razer diamondback and nforce boards which`ll be corrected with a future driver update
Totally agree - you'll want to keep your equipment in tip-top shape, if you are a "serious" gamer. I often clean out my console-gaming controllers every six months to keep them in the best shape.Originally posted by: Mem
Bottom line is MX510/1000 and Razer Diamondback are all more then good enough for gaming.
Btw two things that do help during gaming are a good mouse pad and teflon feet(and don`t forget to clean them now and then,I won`t go into wear and tear),I see too many people buy a good gaming mouse and forget about these two items.