CADsortaGUY
Lifer
Originally posted by: burnedout
An interesting segment concerning David Van Os, Bill Burkett's attorney, from the New York Times:
[Hat tip: Ed Morrisey]
Incidentally, Mr. Van Os is running for seat on the TX Supreme Court.An article on Wednesday about disputed memos obtained by CBS News that cast doubt on aspects of President Bush's service in the Texas Air National Guard truncated a quotation from David Van Os, a lawyer for Bill Burkett, a retired National Guard officer whom Newsweek called a source of the memos. Asked what role Mr. Burkett had in raising questions about Mr. Bush's military service, Mr. Van Os posed a hypothetical chain of events in which someone - not Mr. Burkett, he said - reconstructed documents that the preparer believed existed in 1972 or 1973. Mr. Van Os then asked "what difference would even that make'' to the "factual reality of where was George W. Bush at the times in question and what was he doing?''
Buahahahaha.. A pre-emptive defense? Does he really think people will buy that BS?
CsG