Hey folks.  Great site and forum here.  Information here helped me decide on my first PC build.  I have a question about Raid and Windows XP that I?ve seen conflicting information on, though.
Here?s the setup that?s being shipped to me this week from Newegg.com:
* Asus 875P Chipset Motherboard for Intel Socket 478 CPU, Model "P4C800-E DELUXE" -RETAIL
* Intel Pentium 4/ 2.6C GHz 800MHz FSB, 512K Cache, Hyper Threading Technology - Retail (plan to OC to 250+ FSB)
* Geil Ultra Series Dual Channel 184 Pin 1GB(512MBx2) DDR PC-4000 - Retail
* 2 x Western Digital 36.7GB 10,000RPM SATA Raptor Hard Drives, Model WD360GD (RAID 0)
* Antec Performance Series II Mid Tower Case With 350W Power Supply,Model:SX835II,Retail
* Windows XP Home Edition Full Version w/SP 1a - OEM
* Miscellaneous extras like Arctic Silver thermal compound and 2 extra case fans to blow over HD's
I have a Ti4200 I?m planning on bringing over from my current system until this generation of Radeons and GeForce cards become ?older? and less expensive?there?s still life in that puppy.
I?ll also use my Lite-On 48x24x48 CDR/RW as my primary ROM unless I find some great deals on DVD-R this weekend.
My question comes down to this:
I?m putting the 2 Raptors into a Raid 0 configuration on the ICHR5 controller on the motherboard. I?m going to use a standard IDE HD at 7200 RPM in addition to that Raid array, probably on the same controller?I don?t see any need to put it on the Promise controller.
I?ve seen totally conflicting info on the issue of where my OS, swap file, and data should be, though?on the Raid 0 or on the IDE.
For the most part, I play online games like EverQuest, Horizons, WWIIOnline, etc., and some FPS games, along with MP3 and DVD playback, on top of normal internet usage. I don?t do much photo/video editing, CAD, etc.
Would it be better to install the OS and swap file on the 7200 RPM IDE drive and use the Raid 0 for data at fast transfer rates?
Or would I be better off putting XP and my swap file on the Raid array for fast OS speed with data going to the IDE drive?
Also, is 1.5 x RAM still the optimum for manual swap file size with Windows XP? I remember that guideline several years ago, but don?t know whether that holds true or whether I should just let XP handle memory on its own.
I?ve seen folks make recommendations both ways, and I?d love some expert opinions based on my usage.
Thanks in advance for any input and have a save and Happy New Year.
Coach
			
			Here?s the setup that?s being shipped to me this week from Newegg.com:
* Asus 875P Chipset Motherboard for Intel Socket 478 CPU, Model "P4C800-E DELUXE" -RETAIL
* Intel Pentium 4/ 2.6C GHz 800MHz FSB, 512K Cache, Hyper Threading Technology - Retail (plan to OC to 250+ FSB)
* Geil Ultra Series Dual Channel 184 Pin 1GB(512MBx2) DDR PC-4000 - Retail
* 2 x Western Digital 36.7GB 10,000RPM SATA Raptor Hard Drives, Model WD360GD (RAID 0)
* Antec Performance Series II Mid Tower Case With 350W Power Supply,Model:SX835II,Retail
* Windows XP Home Edition Full Version w/SP 1a - OEM
* Miscellaneous extras like Arctic Silver thermal compound and 2 extra case fans to blow over HD's
I have a Ti4200 I?m planning on bringing over from my current system until this generation of Radeons and GeForce cards become ?older? and less expensive?there?s still life in that puppy.
I?ll also use my Lite-On 48x24x48 CDR/RW as my primary ROM unless I find some great deals on DVD-R this weekend.
My question comes down to this:
I?m putting the 2 Raptors into a Raid 0 configuration on the ICHR5 controller on the motherboard. I?m going to use a standard IDE HD at 7200 RPM in addition to that Raid array, probably on the same controller?I don?t see any need to put it on the Promise controller.
I?ve seen totally conflicting info on the issue of where my OS, swap file, and data should be, though?on the Raid 0 or on the IDE.
For the most part, I play online games like EverQuest, Horizons, WWIIOnline, etc., and some FPS games, along with MP3 and DVD playback, on top of normal internet usage. I don?t do much photo/video editing, CAD, etc.
Would it be better to install the OS and swap file on the 7200 RPM IDE drive and use the Raid 0 for data at fast transfer rates?
Or would I be better off putting XP and my swap file on the Raid array for fast OS speed with data going to the IDE drive?
Also, is 1.5 x RAM still the optimum for manual swap file size with Windows XP? I remember that guideline several years ago, but don?t know whether that holds true or whether I should just let XP handle memory on its own.
I?ve seen folks make recommendations both ways, and I?d love some expert opinions based on my usage.
Thanks in advance for any input and have a save and Happy New Year.
Coach
 
				
		 
			 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		
 Facebook
Facebook Twitter
Twitter