• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Random question...(guys only)

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: eakers
for the girl version of this question: i would rather be super smart and ugly.

Me too.
rolleye.gif
 
Thats a tough question, I think I'd just pick being me. I'm used to being 6'6" so I'd tick me off not be able reach things high up. Being this tall is already a pain in the butt when it comes to finding cars, beds, chairs, and all kinds of other things, so being super tall might be a hassle.

I think having a good mix gives you better balance in life. On the other hand it would have been fun to be supremely attractive in HS and college. Would definitely cause ego problems though....

Memnoch
 
I'm already 1 😉 😛

Would I trade some of my astonishingly good looks for a couple inches here and there? No way.

My g/f rags on me every now and then for being "short" (I'm 5'10", she's 6'0") but I don't get any complaints in other areas 😀
 
1

The endowed thing is over-rated. I'm averagely endowed (and not afraid to admit it), but got more women because of my great looks. Married now, so none of that matters anymore.
 
Originally posted by: DeafeningSilence
One

"It's not the size of the boat, it's the motion in the ocean..." 😀


(cough)bullsh!t(cough)

Girls really want the TITANIC! :Q

(pssst: Besides, it's not the length, it's the THICKNESSSSSS) 😱
 
Back
Top