• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Rand Study Shows Compensation For 9/11 Terror Attacks Tops $38 BIllion; Businesses Receive Biggest Share

Riprorin

Banned
RAND researchers found that businesses hurt by the attacks have received most of the compensation that the study was able to quantify. The families of civilians killed and the civilians who were injured received the second-highest payments. The study found that:

Businesses in New York City, particularly in lower Manhattan near the World Trade Center, have received $23.3 billion in compensation for property damage, disrupted operations, and economic incentives. About 75 percent of that came from insurance companies. More than $4.9 billion went to revitalize the economy of Lower Manhattan.

Civilians killed or seriously injured received a total of $8.7 billion, averaging about $3.1 million per recipient. Most of this came from the Victim Compensation Fund, but payments also came from insurance companies, employers and charities.

About $3.5 billion was paid to displaced residents, workers who lost their jobs, or others who suffered emotional trauma or were exposed to environmental hazards.

Emergency responders killed or injured received a total of $1.9 billion, with most of that coming from the government. Payments averaged about $1.1 million more per person than for civilians with similar economic losses, with most of the higher amount due to payments from charities.

Link

No amount of money can replace a human life. While my heart goes out to anyone that lost a loved one, doesn't the amount of compensation seem a little bit out of whack?
 
So your heart goes out to them and no amount of money can replace a human life but in the same sentence you believe it was too much money. Priceless.
 
Well, they did pay for the insurance...it's not like it was free money. If you exclude that, then $4.9 billion was the "free money" the govt. gave out to businesses.
 
Originally posted by: BarneyFife
So your heart goes out to them and no amount of money can replace a human life but in the same sentence you believe it was too much money. Priceless.

I said that it seems out of whack.

Emergency responders killed or injured received a total of $1.9 billion, with most of that coming from the government. Payments averaged about $1.1 million more per person than for civilians with similar economic losses, with most of the higher amount due to payments from charities.

Why not 10 million, or a 100 million? How about a billion each? How much is too much?
 
Originally posted by: alchemize
Well, they did pay for the insurance...it's not like it was free money. If you exclude that, then $4.9 billion was the "free money" the govt. gave out to businesses.

I don't have any issue with the insurance money that was paid out. That's why businesses and individuals pay premiums.
 
The US is tens of trillions in debt, 38 billion is nothing to keep the dollar propped up until it's last final gasp.
 
The US is tens of trillions in debt, 38 billion is nothing to keep the dollar propped up until it's last final gasp.

Originally posted by: loki8481
what are you proposing to do about it?



Keep building base of physical precious metals and hope for complete devaluation of US currency in the 500-1000% range, you?


 
38 Billion?

Nothing compared to what we spent to attack the Iraqis and are not nearly done yet.

Chump change.
 
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
38 Billion?

Nothing compared to what we spent to attack the Iraqis and are not nearly done yet.

Chump change.

You honestly think the US military couldn't produce a much higher civilian death rate if that was their intention?
 
First Rip questions the generosity the world has shown in the Tsunami aftermath, now's he's after the generosity after 9/11?

Go away.
 
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
38 Billion?

Nothing compared to what we spent to attack the Iraqis and are not nearly done yet.

Chump change.

You honestly think the US military couldn't produce a much higher civilian death rate if that was their intention?

The US kills exactly as many as it thinks it needs to. No more, no less. It would be naive to assume otherwise. Whatever the objective is, we get it done. Fortunately there is enough pressure to keep the deaths lower than might be, but make no mistake a war on a nation is a war on a people.

And it's still chump change.
 
Originally posted by: NeoV
First Rip questions the generosity the world has shown in the Tsunami aftermath, now's he's after the generosity after 9/11?

Go away.

It's good to be generous. It's also good to know where the money's going and how it's being used.

Rahter than enriching the victims of 9/11, maybe the money could have been used to create a fund to benefit the families of emergency workers nationwide who suffers loss.

Just a thought.
 
If we're talking in monetary terms, these are investments that will pay for themselves. Keep those businesses and residents in New York City where they can be taxed while returning to productivity.
 
Back
Top