• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Rand Paul raising funds for KY senate race

spidey07

No Lifer
What went from a "maybe I'll run" to a confirmed running for an upcoming open (in 2010) senator seat from Sen. Bunning is resonating with a lot of people. It's interesting to watch a private citizen run for such a high position. I wish him well.

It's an interesting story to follow no matter your affiliation.

http://www.randpaul2010.com/

"The campaign cleared over $430,000 in the 24 hour period. "
 
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
The new Messiah, Hallelujah!

Please, a single senator doesn't have much power and he's running against a very competent and franky damned good opponent in the primaries. I'd be happy with either Trey Greyson or Paul who are the front runners in the primary.
 
"Enthusiastic supporters of Rand Paul, a candidate for the U.S. Senate seat from Kentucky, made political online history yesterday. The real-time donation counter at Dr. Paul?s website at RandPaul2010.com shows that the campaign has raised over $680,000. The campaign cleared over $430,000 in the 24 hour period. Watching the counter it is clear that donations [...]"

The Messiah, I'm telling you. He is even a person carpenter.
 
Go Rand Go. With luck Rand can split the GOP vote and we will get a democratic GOP KY senator. That alone will so thrill Mitch McConnell who really needs something to be thrilled about.
 
Originally posted by: dammitgibs
I've never heard of him...is he a combination of Ayn Rand and Ron Paul?

Pretty much. He's Ron Paul's son. That's right, Ron named his son Rand.
 
Originally posted by: spidey07
It's interesting to watch a private citizen run for such a high position.

Private citizen? How about "seasoned political operative?" 😉

From his own campaign bio:

Dr. Rand Paul delivered his first public speech in a debate with Senator Phil Gramm at the age of 21 in San Antonio. For his father?s Presidential campaign, Dr. Rand Paul traveled throughout ten different states. In December of 2007, he spoke to thousands of supporters at the historic Fanueil Hall in Boston on the day his father?s campaign set the record for most online donations in a single day.

 
The funny thing is, the Republicans will probably put him up in 2012 as a fall guy when Obama runs for re-election.
 
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: dammitgibs
I've never heard of him...is he a combination of Ayn Rand and Ron Paul?

Pretty much. He's Ron Paul's son. That's right, Ron named his son Rand.

Randal.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-Ky7dQLuNg

Despite the internet money he's bound to get -- and this $680,000 is definitely just the beginning -- I actually don't think he gives the Republicans a better shot at beating Mongiardo.
 
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
The new Messiah, Hallelujah!

No kidding.

"$2 million to win in Kentucky and promote liberty across America."

Liberty, much like Jesus, requires large infusions of cash. Right on! I didn't realize that. What's next? $4 Million to promote freedom?

:laugh:

Here's a little hint: We already have liberty and freedom and no one (in this country, at least) is threatening either. Stop pretending like they are. It only reinforces your paranoid delusional state of mind.
 
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
The new Messiah, Hallelujah!

No kidding.

"$2 million to win in Kentucky and promote liberty across America."

Liberty, much like Jesus, requires large infusions of cash. Right on! I didn't realize that. What's next? $4 Million to promote freedom?

:laugh:

Here's a little hint: We already have liberty and freedom and no one (in this country, at least) is threatening either. Stop pretending like they are. It only reinforces your paranoid delusional state of mind.

Running for political office unfortunately does require such large amounts of cash. The federal government has already spent far more than four million dollars in the name of "freedom", without much to show for it.
 
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Go Rand Go. With luck Rand can split the GOP vote and we will get a democratic GOP KY senator. That alone will so thrill Mitch McConnell who really needs something to be thrilled about.

Do you know how elections work? Obviously not.

He's running the in republican primary. Anybody that would vote for him will vote for Trey Greyson in the senate election if Paul happens to lose the primary. So what do you mean "split the GOP vote"?
 
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Go Rand Go. With luck Rand can split the GOP vote and we will get a democratic GOP KY senator. That alone will so thrill Mitch McConnell who really needs something to be thrilled about.

Do you know how elections work? Obviously not.

He's running the in republican primary. Anybody that would vote for him will vote for Trey Greyson in the senate election if Paul happens to lose the primary. So what do you mean "split the GOP vote"?

...unless he runs as a third-party candidate
 
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Go Rand Go. With luck Rand can split the GOP vote and we will get a democratic GOP KY senator. That alone will so thrill Mitch McConnell who really needs something to be thrilled about.

Do you know how elections work? Obviously not.

He's running the in republican primary. Anybody that would vote for him will vote for Trey Greyson in the senate election if Paul happens to lose the primary. So what do you mean "split the GOP vote"?

...unless he runs as a third-party candidate

But he's not. He's running in the republican primary.
 
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Go Rand Go. With luck Rand can split the GOP vote and we will get a democratic GOP KY senator. That alone will so thrill Mitch McConnell who really needs something to be thrilled about.

Do you know how elections work? Obviously not.

He's running the in republican primary. Anybody that would vote for him will vote for Trey Greyson in the senate election if Paul happens to lose the primary. So what do you mean "split the GOP vote"?

...unless he runs as a third-party candidate

But he's not. He's running in the republican primary.

Except he has openly stated he's not a Republican, and is only running as such because he otherwise wouldn't win. He's a politician just like anyone else where the ends justify the means.
 
Originally posted by: Evan
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Go Rand Go. With luck Rand can split the GOP vote and we will get a democratic GOP KY senator. That alone will so thrill Mitch McConnell who really needs something to be thrilled about.

Do you know how elections work? Obviously not.

He's running the in republican primary. Anybody that would vote for him will vote for Trey Greyson in the senate election if Paul happens to lose the primary. So what do you mean "split the GOP vote"?

...unless he runs as a third-party candidate

But he's not. He's running in the republican primary.

Except he has openly stated he's not a Republican, and is only running as such because he otherwise wouldn't win. He's a politician just like anyone else where the ends justify the means.

I think he wants to distance himself from modern Republicans and that is definitely a good thing. The modern Republican party isn't conservative about anything except social issues; modern Republicans are happy to authorize huge spending and rights abuses when it suits them, such as the Patriot Act and the Iraq War. There are those true conservatives who want a fiscally conservative government that doesn't act as the world's policeman and doesn't suspend constitutional rights on a whim. Ron/Rand Paul are those people.

 
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Originally posted by: Evan
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Go Rand Go. With luck Rand can split the GOP vote and we will get a democratic GOP KY senator. That alone will so thrill Mitch McConnell who really needs something to be thrilled about.

Do you know how elections work? Obviously not.

He's running the in republican primary. Anybody that would vote for him will vote for Trey Greyson in the senate election if Paul happens to lose the primary. So what do you mean "split the GOP vote"?

...unless he runs as a third-party candidate

But he's not. He's running in the republican primary.

Except he has openly stated he's not a Republican, and is only running as such because he otherwise wouldn't win. He's a politician just like anyone else where the ends justify the means.

I think he wants to distance himself from modern Republicans and that is definitely a good thing. The modern Republican party isn't conservative about anything except social issues; modern Republicans are happy to authorize huge spending and rights abuses when it suits them, such as the Patriot Act and the Iraq War. There are those true conservatives who want a fiscally conservative government that doesn't act as the world's policeman and doesn't suspend constitutional rights on a whim. Ron/Rand Paul are those people.

They're not Republicans, they're Libertarians. Frankly, Republicans were never what you described save for maybe a brief moment in history. What you're describing is a far-right, fringe ideology where international isolationism and little to no gov't are its top two policy platforms. That platform doesn't win elections, both Pauls know it, which is why they run as Republicans even though they aren't anything of the sort.
 
Perhaps the GOP should split into two distinct parties: 1.) Libertarians, 2.) Socially-Conservative Sarah Palin-worshipers? I'm a much bigger fan of the former, than the latter. As are most sensible folks.
 
Back
Top