That would be tragic for the Libertarian Party. A society full of self-loathers wouldn't have any Libertarians in it at all!If the Libertarians are going to save us they better get their asses in gear. It looks to me like people will figure out they hate themselves sooner than we'll have a viable Libertarian party.
http://www.clevelandfed.org/research/commentary/2009/0909.cfm
Simply put, the US has slack rules on getting loans. It was completely legal to lend money to people when you know they can't possibly pay it back. The US put emphasis on insuring the mortgage. Groups like Freddie Mac are a part of this problem.
1) give a loan to someone with a high loan to value ratio (lend them 100% the cost of the house)
2) give the loan at interest rates that are expected to rise
3) wait for the person to stop making payments for whatever reason
4) insurance monay pays the rest
Of course that's just the housing bubble.
If the Libertarians are going to save us they better get their asses in gear. It looks to me like people will figure out they hate themselves sooner than we'll have a viable Libertarian party.
The only one standing in your way is you. 🙂
Not to dampen the spirit here, but Paul has dropped 7 points the last few months in his primary battle. Still in the lead but needs to stabilize things over the next few months.
![]()
And you want to see an era of expanding federal government intrusion with an ever-increasing debt?
While the deregulation was irresponsible due to other factors (fractional reserve banking, FDIC), low interest rates were the primary cause of this entire mess.
There are plenty of people who spit on the legacies of both Presidents Bush and Obama equally as reckless deficit loving corporate oligarchic statists who have greatly diminished the personal liberty of every American.Why you talking about the Bush era like that?
Why you talking about the Bush era like that?
There are plenty of people who spit on the legacies of both Presidents Bush and Obama equally as reckless deficit loving corporate oligarchic statists who have greatly diminished the personal liberty of every American.
I am a surfer who only rides on mighty waves. My eyes are on the horizon.
You do realize he posted an econ paper showing statistical evidence of his argument and you're talking out of your ass, right?
The guy that he quoted made the same, unsubstantiated argument.
What do you do when empirics disagree with your dogma?
US vs Canada, housing prices and interest rates:
Housing price index:
![]()
Central Bank target rates:
![]()
Benchmark mortgage rates:
![]()
Bah can't pull the pics of of the article. Just read the thing.,
I think we've already been through this...
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2052075
Err where is the relevant part?
Your argument is that low interest rates caused the speculation and crash. Our next door neighbor had the same interest rates and they have not experienced crazy speculation or crash.
I would guess that the low rates didn't help, but real world data points to a completely different cause.
Also the fact the speculation was more pronounced in certain areas more than others would suggest that interest rates were not the main driver. (primate rate is the same in cali as in texas)
^ I like that he can't cite his own posts for explanations. 😀
You want to see an era of anarchy and tribulation followed by a reactionary swing to statism?
I'd like to see true fiscal conservatives oust every member of Congress, regardless of the incumbent's party.
I'd happily see Libertarians replace every Democrat and Republican in Congress.
Didn't this just happen? Conservatives wanted de-regulation. It happened. Anarchy. People elect "the most liberal candidate ever" (I don't know if that's true, Obama seems the same as all the other dems)
Why you talking about the Bush era like that?
^ Yeah, that'd be funny if I weren't always right about you, though. It's just boring making fun of you now.
^ Gold! Dollar collapse! F-R-E-E-D-O-M!
It's not a long thread. Just look for Vic's posts.