Originally posted by: DerKaiser
DerKaiser, i'm glad you did your due diligence on this one. You should read into it further, you'll be entertained at the very least, disgusted with the infringers and the memory fab industry at the very most.
Dude, you're too emotionally tied up with this thing. I couldn't really give a s**t one way or another.
Just because they have patents doesn't mean they acted ethically. And just because one judge says they infringed does not mean the matter is not debatable which was my original point. If you recall in the case of Rambus vs Infineon, the judge originally made a very narrow interpretation of the patent language. That was thrown out by an appeals court and the whole thing needed to be started over again. The same thing could happen here if Hynix decides to appeal.
To me it's pretty clear that Rambus amended their patents to cover as much of SDR and DDR RAM as they could regardless of whether or not they "invented" it.
You wouldn't know if I were "emotionally tied up" with this thing or not, unless text conveys some emotion i'm not aware of. I know plenty of people say they "hate" rambus. Maybe you're one of them. Hate is the most powerful emotion of all, and I sense it's not ME who's more emotional about it
Anyway, they amended their PATENT CLAIMS, and had every right to do so. When patent law hits the federal circuit, it's all nitty gritty details. Judge Randall Rader is the first and foremost patent law authority in the country and taught the subject at numerous law schools. Google his name if you need more creds. If there's an authority to trust in all of this, it's his.
After all, it's HIS textbook ("Patent Law") that's used in 45 law schools across the country.
He sided with Rambus. People will try to discredit him. But those people are stupid. 'nuff said.
