wise1oldman

Junior Member
Dec 23, 2002
12
0
0
I am setting up a new computer and would like info concerning a 4channel RAID. Raid 0 is stripping and writes alternet data to drive 1 and drive 2(?) Raid 1 writes all data to drive 3 and drive 4(?) My question is: RAID0 is fast because it spreads the writing between disk 1 and disk2, while RAID1 writes all the data to each drive. If RAID 0 is fast and RAID1 is slower, how can I have a fast readwrite system with BOTH these Raid configuration active?:confused
 

rbayer

Member
Dec 22, 2002
69
0
0
My guess is you've read the faq and are still confused as to how having both active helps in any way. The answer is, it doesn't. In fact, depending on your HD controller(s) it can be slower than plain RAID 0. The advantage, however, is that you also get the redundancy of RAID1. As a simple example, let's take a 2-disc RAID0. Because the data is split up over two disks, it can be written (approx) twice as fast. A 512k file, for example, will be written at the speed of a 256k file because both HDs work simulataneously. However, if either disk fails, all of your data is lost. Not good. Now take a 2-disc RAID1. Speeds will be approx. the same as a single, non-RAID drive, but both disks would have to die before you lost any data.

Now combine the two:
A 512k file is split into two 256k parts. Each of these parts gets written to two drives, all at the same time. Plus, if any one drive fails, you've already duplicated all the data on a spare HD which will kick-in on the fly, causing 0 downtime and 0 lost data. The key to RAID is that multiple HDs can be working simulataneously, giving the appearance of reduced write-times. This is one reason why RAID works better on SCSI than on IDE, but even that is changing as IDE buses become faster and faster.
 

wise1oldman

Junior Member
Dec 23, 2002
12
0
0
I basically understand the RAID's But my question was with BOTH RAID 0 and 1 would the RAID 1 slow down the disk reading and writing that I would have gained with just RAID 0