if I found the right article or not...
This was a tough one. After my ATA/100 article was published (ATA/100 - Real Performance or Marketing Hype?) there were a number of questions from readers asking about IDE RAID 0 (Striping) performance and whether there is any advantage of ATA/100 over ATA/66 when using RAID 0. I suspect that some readers felt that due to two drives being able to burst small amounts of data at high speed, you would see a difference with the higher ATA mode when two or more ATA/100 drives were combined into an array. What made it tough was not only figuring out what to test and how to test it, but at the same time I had to make sure I didn?t fall into a trap. What ?trap? you ask? One that anyone testing system performance can fall into: picking the benchmark(s) to prove your point (and that point can be either something that does or does not give a gain). It also took a fair amount of time because every time the drive mode was changed I had to re-install Windows.
The article is mainly on stripping raid 0, which isn't even raid because raid 0 is not raid by definition.
RAID 1+ is real raid, other wise, it's just throwing 2 drive together as 1 big drive..
Only benefit of IDE raid is mirroring since you can only have so many HDDs in a ide system and there isn't much raid 5 arounds..
The only reason you mirror is because if 1 drive dies, the other MIGHT still be good so you either go buy a new HD today or backup that good drive before going on.
You can use stripping for games and crap but like mlg said, double your hd failing... one drive die, both drive dies in a raid 0 which isn't raid, just stripping..