I am seriously considering putting together a RAID 0 array on my new system, but have a few questions. From those that are running RAID 0, is performance noticably better on the system? I have seen synthetic benchmarks which show a pretty dramatic increase in throughput, but real world benchmarks didn't demonstrate a significant gain. I am of the mindset that the HD is the biggest bottleneck in the system and helping to alleviate it is important. So, since I will be getting a RAID capable board anyway, is it worth it to shell out $140 for an extra HD? Is system and program loading noticable faster? Is write speed improved a great deal?
I also have a quick question about drive management with RAID 0. From what I understand the RAID controller makes the two drives function as one. Does this hold true in partitioning scenarios, i.e. using Partition Magic to split up a big 60 GB drive into a multiboot 3 partition drive?
I have also heard that some of the processing needed by onboard RAID controllers is performed by the CPU, giving some overhead. Is this overhead significant? I am assuming not with 1 GHz processors, but I heard the number 30% thrown around somewhere.
Thanks for the input!
I also have a quick question about drive management with RAID 0. From what I understand the RAID controller makes the two drives function as one. Does this hold true in partitioning scenarios, i.e. using Partition Magic to split up a big 60 GB drive into a multiboot 3 partition drive?
I have also heard that some of the processing needed by onboard RAID controllers is performed by the CPU, giving some overhead. Is this overhead significant? I am assuming not with 1 GHz processors, but I heard the number 30% thrown around somewhere.
Thanks for the input!
