emotional, yes. when you can directly connect the preventable murders of thousands of people over the years to easy and unregulated access to guns, the conversation becomes emotional. Loony is also appropriate in only the absurdly predictable tack ALL debates on this topic take. 'Patriots' (gun rights) bullying 'Libtards' (gun control) with recycled talking points from AM, conservative radio and 'Snowflakes' dismissing 'Rednecks' as ignorant and regressive. I'm actually a gun owner in the state of California where the restrictions are some of the strictest and most asinine in the country. I take issue with some of the government involvement in that area of my life, but to frame this debate as some sort of struggle between patriots and communists where anything less than zero oversight on gun ownership is an affront to a God given right is absurd. Alex Jones behavior in relation to Sandy Hook was atrocious and served as red meat to a fan base that seems inconvenienced by facts. Yeah, guns don't kill people, people kill people. So why would a reasonable investigation into the mental health or criminal history of a gun buyer be such a problem? Vet the buyers. i'm not familiar with the gun laws in every state, but i do know that anyone can walk into an AZ shop and walk out with a pistol. Understandably, its a big and complex issue that's resistant to simple solutions, but the attitude of the gun rights crowd that puffs itself up with righteousness and absurd extremes (a discussion about the regulation of bump-stocks is off limits because, why?) is exhausting and counter productive. There is a civil solution, and it starts with both sides of the issue.I was trying to let this go and leave the thread on its original track, but if you guys want to keep it going here I'll be happy to continue my arguments and discuss how loony, emotional, and non-logical the anti-gun side is.