Originally posted by: jb20thae
Is it safe to assume this card is a worse performer than the x700?
Originally posted by: fbrdphreak
The X1600... it has a relatively small numder of render output pipelines which limits its performance.
http://www.laptoplogic.com/resources/detail.php?id=37
Originally posted by: jb20thae
Originally posted by: fbrdphreak
The X1600... it has a relatively small numder of render output pipelines which limits its performance.
http://www.laptoplogic.com/resources/detail.php?id=37
The render output pipelines have got to be twice the x1400, though, right?
Originally posted by: evenmore1
How about GF 7400? Saw some on newegg...
Originally posted by: fbrdphreak
GF7400 should be around an X1400 in performance; its also a 4 pixel pipeline card. Nothing special
Originally posted by: fbrdphreak
The X1600 would fit just fine. In fact, the Thinkpad T60p's use a FireGL V5200 which is the workstation version of the MR X1600. Keep in mind that while the X1600 has 12 pipes, it has a relatively small numder of render output pipelines which limits its performance. The reason most mfrs do not use the X1600 in 15" notebooks is because (A) 15" and smaller machines are meant to have image of high battery life; the MR X1600 draws more power. and (B) because most 15" machines these days are budget oriented, and definitely not gaming oriented.
Laptop Gaming Benchmarks:
http://www.laptoplogic.com/resources/detail.php?id=37