• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Racist Steve King loses in Iowa primary

Commodus

Diamond Member
With virtually all precincts reporting, Steve King has lost soundly in his district primary. And due to the nature of Iowa election laws, he can't run as an independent. We'll be free of his racism in politics for at least four years.

Haven't heard much about the winner, Ralph Feenstra, but it wouldn't take much to be an improvement over King.

Also, isn't it symbolic that King lost on a day full of anti-racism protests? They didn't necessarily cost him the vote, but I'd like to think of it as a treat for the US that at least one racist has lost power.
 
With virtually all precincts reporting, Steve King has lost soundly in his district primary. And due to the nature of Iowa election laws, he can't run as an independent. We'll be free of his racism in politics for at least four years.

Haven't heard much about the winner, Ralph Feenstra, but it wouldn't take much to be an improvement over King.

Also, isn't it symbolic that King lost on a day full of anti-racism protests? They didn't necessarily cost him the vote, but I'd like to think of it as a treat for the US that at least one racist has lost power.
2 years, congress critters are elected every 2 years.

love this line from steve
"The Never Trumpers are the people who ginned this all up," King said in a recent debate, speaking with an air of defiance about the Republicans "who want Steve King out of the way."


it not because voters got tired of his crap, it was 'never trumpers' who did this to him.
 
Last edited:
With virtually all precincts reporting, Steve King has lost soundly in his district primary. And due to the nature of Iowa election laws, he can't run as an independent. We'll be free of his racism in politics for at least four years.

Haven't heard much about the winner, Ralph Feenstra, but it wouldn't take much to be an improvement over King.

Also, isn't it symbolic that King lost on a day full of anti-racism protests? They didn't necessarily cost him the vote, but I'd like to think of it as a treat for the US that at least one racist has lost power.

What a joke. You don't even know how long people serve in the government. I used to believe you were a voice of reason, but after reading this:

A Columbia study indicated that the US could have avoided tens of thousands of deaths if lockdowns had started a week earlier. One week.

Ending lockdowns too soon is expected to produce similar effects. Two weeks makes a gigantic difference in the midst of a pandemic.

If it were me, I'd have called the police and taken delight in having every single person arrested. They want to threaten the lives of everyone in their community? I'll happily remove them from society to ensure they're no longer a threat to anyone.

You sound authoritarian. Where are you going to put them? In jails where they have been letting people out because of fear of Covid-19? That's OK, everyone who doesn't wear masks and social distance is a dumb drumpf supporter. Can't wait to check this tomorrow and see how much I've gotten burned. I mean after all, I pointed out the Bill Mahr hoped for a recession multiple times but it was simply called "sarcasm".
 
Last edited:
Damn, you beat me to it.

Doesn't matter that it's 2 years instead of 4 BTW. After losing this primary, he's politically dead. The odds of him ever serving elected office at the federal level again are minimal.
 
What a joke. You don't even know how long people serve in the government. I used to believe you were a voice of reason, but after reading this:



You sound authoritarian. Where are you going to put them? In jails where they have been letting people out because of fear of Covid-19? That's OK, everyone who doesn't wear masks and social distance is a dumb drumpf supporter. Can't wait to check this tomorrow and see how much I've gotten burned. I mean after all, I pointed out the Bill Mahr hoped for a recession multiple times but it was simply called "sarcasm"/

The thread where he posted that is here:


It is off topic for this thread.

Also, you didn't say a thing about the thread topic. Did you have any comment on it, or were you just here to criticize the OP?
 
The thread where he posted that is here:


It is off topic for this thread.

Also, you didn't say a thing about the thread topic. Did you have any comment on it, or were you just here to criticize the OP?

I have quoted users from different threads in the tech spots if it was relevant without issue. I guess the mods will decide. However, I don't think that I'll receive the "May the odds ever be in your favor" response.

Please DO NOT reference the mods or our moderating in open forum. We do not countenance any instance of it. There is but ONE legitimate venue for addressing the mods or referencing our moderation, and that is Moderator Discussions.

Perknose
Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have quoted users from different threads in the tech spots if it was relevant without issue. I guess the mods will decide. However, I don't think that I'll receive the "May the odds ever be in your favor" response.

Yeah, sure, if it was relevant. This isn't about mods or rules either. I don't care if you broke a rule or not. What you're doing is posting in bad faith. You're crapping the thread by importing a disagreement you have with the OP about a completely unrelated topic. What does the OP's opinion of how to handle people who violate COVID-19 restrictions have to do with Steve King losing the primary?

Apparently you didn't like the topic. Are you butthurt about King losing the primary and so you just wanted to change the subject? If that isn't the case, I can't think of a single reason you wouldn't have replied to that in the thread in which it was posted.
 
Yeah, sure, if it was relevant. This isn't about mods or rules either. I don't care if you broke a rule or not. What you're doing is posting in bad faith. You're crapping the thread by importing a disagreement you have with the OP about a completely unrelated topic. What does the OP's opinion of how to handle people who violate COVID-19 restrictions have to do with Steve King losing the primary?

Apparently you didn't like the topic. Are you butthurt about King losing the primary and so you just wanted to change the subject? If that isn't the case, I can't think of a single reason you wouldn't have replied to that in the thread in which it was posted.

I never even heard of King until now. I am interested to see the primary with AOC though.
 
I never even heard of King until now. I am interested to see the primary with AOC though.
So instead of shit posting go learn something. Look the guy up and find out why his party stripped of his committee assignments.

Back on topic. I have no doubt his replace will be every bit the conservative rural legislator that King was but there is hope that even voters in King’s district can get tired of the racist grand standing that had nothing to do with their interests.
 
Really don’t get these trolls. We call them out for being a Trumpard and they get all defensive and I didn’t vote for him. I’m not a supporter. Really, everything you say shows otherwise. If it looks like a duck. And sounds like a duck.
 
I supposed Republicans want a cookie. Credit for shit they're supposed to do

"Look at us, we didn't elect a blatant racist"

Oh well it's the Republican Party, I guess we have to start somewhere.
 
What a joke. You don't even know how long people serve in the government. I used to believe you were a voice of reason, but after reading this:



You sound authoritarian. Where are you going to put them? In jails where they have been letting people out because of fear of Covid-19? That's OK, everyone who doesn't wear masks and social distance is a dumb drumpf supporter. Can't wait to check this tomorrow and see how much I've gotten burned. I mean after all, I pointed out the Bill Mahr hoped for a recession multiple times but it was simply called "sarcasm".

I'm sorry I got the terms wrong, but suffice it to say King will have a tough time coming back.

And I'm not authoritarian, it's that I believe in science. You know, observable evidence and reality. The virus doesn't care that you really, really want to have a backyard barbecue; it'll happily ruin your life or that of a loved one. If you're in a state where social distancing rules are still in effect and you insist on a house party, then yes, the full weight of the law should come down upon you. You want to put the entire community in danger purely out of selfishness? Then we can make sure you don't harm the community for a long time. If a jail or prison isn't safe, then house arrest. Or if that's still too much trouble, a steep fine.

This is what makes me nervous about the BLM protests. I'm all in favor of people protesting for a good cause (as opposed to the "I want others to die so I can get a haircut" types) and will not ask them to stay in, but there is a certain amount of gambling here. Thankfully, many of the protesters are wearing masks... I just hope it's enough to avoid a resurgence of the virus.
 
Nah, it still helps. They dramatically reduce the spread of droplets no matter how much you're yelling.
Look how often the mask shifts and needs to be readjusted. This is why the initial reluctance to recommend mask wearing, the false sense of security. Hopefully no one is infected in these protests, but the spike will be seen in the numbers at the end of the week.
 
I never even heard of King until now. I am interested to see the primary with AOC though.
Should we be shocked you don't know the name of a blatantly racist Republican Congressman but you know the name of AOC who just got elected to Congress. Unfortunately people like me need to know the name of people like King.

Same reason I need to be aware of names like...
Tamir Rice
John Crawford

BTW - In case you were unaware systemic racism is a huge problem in police departments.
 
I never even heard of King until now. I am interested to see the primary with AOC though.
Really, you've never heard of Steve King? You've been posting in P&N since at least 2017 and you haven't heard of Steve King, who's racism has gotten him splashed on the top headlines over the last several years? I find that difficult to believe.
 
Really, you've never heard of Steve King? You've been posting in P&N since at least 2017 and you haven't heard of Steve King, who's racism has gotten him splashed on the top headlines over the last several years? I find that difficult to believe.
maybe he confused him with Steven King, oh ya, probably never heard of him either /s
 
Really don’t get these trolls. We call them out for being a Trumpard and they get all defensive and I didn’t vote for him. I’m not a supporter. Really, everything you say shows otherwise. If it looks like a duck. And sounds like a duck.
Even the dumbest of them are coming to realize that there is no logic or justification/rationalization for continuing to support him. Now it's just knee-jerk reactions to 'not support him' while they still defend the admin and it's actions. The juggling with pulleys dance is fucking pathetic.
 
I wouldn't take this too seriously. King was openly sacrificed by the GOP Establishment because he was an embarrassment, and (more importantly) because his bullshit had cost him all of his committee seats in the House.
 
I wouldn't take this too seriously. King was openly sacrificed by the GOP Establishment because he was an embarrassment, and (more importantly) because his bullshit had cost him all of his committee seats in the House.

Oh yeah, the GOP is determined to get him out, but it's still good news that he is out.

It's also telling that King was attracted to the GOP in the first place, and that the party tolerated him for years before the public pressure became too great. He reflects one of the underlying problems with Republicans: the party may claim that it's not racist, but it attracts racists like flies with its policies.
 
Back
Top