soundforbjt
Lifer
- Feb 15, 2002
- 17,787
- 6,035
- 136
You can tell it's close to election season by the new faces and some others becoming more active.
Now add sanctuary city's and states into the mix. Some areas are refusing to support immigration law, and even shielding illegal immigrants. Why does the federal government have to support services and representation for those illegals? This isn't a sane position.State & local govts are powerless to enforce immigration law. The people who live there don't deserve to be punished for failures of the federal govt.
It's not their job to "support" immigration law. Immigration is a federal job and always has beenNow add sanctuary city's and states into the mix. Some areas are refusing to support immigration law, and even shielding illegal immigrants. Why does the federal government have to support services and representation for those illegals? This isn't a sane position.
Is it their job to shield illegals?It's not their job to "support" immigration law. Immigration is a federal job and always has been
Is it their job to shield illegals?
Is it their job to shield illegals?
They aren't like everybody else, they're in the country illegally.Bullshit. They just treat illegals like they treat everybody else.
They aren't like everybody else, they're in the country illegally.
This is part of the general immigration clusterfuck. I don't want to uproot decent people and throw them out, but that's what their entitled to under their current status, and that sucks.
They aren't like everybody else, they're in the country illegally.
This is part of the general immigration clusterfuck. I don't want to uproot decent people and throw them out, but that's what their entitled to under their current status, and that sucks.
There hasn't been for the last 30 years, and yes, this is both sides. A few play lip service to the issue when they know it's not going anywhere. No one cares about a real answer.
They aren't like everybody else, they're in the country illegally.
This is part of the general immigration clusterfuck. I don't want to uproot decent people and throw them out, but that's what their entitled to under their current status, and that sucks.
There hasn't been for the last 30 years, and yes, this is both sides. A few play lip service to the issue when they know it's not going anywhere. No one cares about a real answer.
Bullshit. Left to our own devices, Dems would hand out a whole shitpile of green cards to illegals who've lived peaceably among us for many years, particularly if they have American citizen spouses or children. We'd do the same for the dreamers & the TPS refugees who've been here for long periods.
We'd also set out to change things in central America so that people would feel safe living there.
Now add sanctuary city's and states into the mix. Some areas are refusing to support immigration law, and even shielding illegal immigrants. Why does the federal government have to support services and representation for those illegals? This isn't a sane position.
There hasn't been for the last 30 years, and yes, this is both sides. A few play lip service to the issue when they know it's not going anywhere. No one cares about a real answer.
I was supposed to be on your ignore list anyways, snowflake. Remember?
Actually that's not the true at all! You seems to think they deserve zero . zilch no credit whatsoever!I think you give them more credit than they deserve.
That was it? In the last thirty years the democrats never had another opportunity to take action? The republicans have been running roughshod over them for thirty years?Absolute nonsense. In 2013 there was a bipartisan bill that passed the senate overwhelmingly and had the support of Democrats in the House and President Obama. Republicans refused to even bring it up for a vote out of fear that it would pass.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bor...ty,_and_Immigration_Modernization_Act_of_2013
So once again you’re trying to #bothsides something that is the fault of conservatives. If you just turn around and blame democrats when republicans act badly they have no incentive to act better.
I cut out everything after this sentence because anything based on that thought is demonstrably incorrect.Those areas are not shielding anyone.
I cut out everything after this sentence because anything based on that thought is demonstrably incorrect.
Sanctuary, a place of refuge and protection.
It's not a place where you will be ignored. It's not a place that's trying to save a buck by not alerting the feds of criminal activity (are phone calls still a dime?). It's a place of refuge and protection. I can define refuge and protection for you if you'd like.
I cut out everything after this sentence because anything based on that thought is demonstrably incorrect.
Sanctuary, a place of refuge and protection.
It's not a place where you will be ignored. It's not a place that's trying to save a buck by not alerting the feds of criminal activity (are phone calls still a dime?). It's a place of refuge and protection. I can define refuge and protection for you if you'd like.
That was it? In the last thirty years the democrats never had another opportunity to take action? The republicans have been running roughshod over them for thirty years?
That was it? In the last thirty years the democrats never had another opportunity to take action? The republicans have been running roughshod over them for thirty years?
That was it? In the last thirty years the democrats never had another opportunity to take action? The republicans have been running roughshod over them for thirty years?