• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Racially motivated violence at World Cup..

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
I think that the potential for another genocide in Europe is growing by the day.

Please stop saying things like that, you go on about it a lot, it is extremely unhelpful.

Last time we talked, you told me that _I_ wanted to genocide _you_ (or your whole race, or whatever) because I am from Europe... Of course, we (the British) were fighting the Nazi genocide well before the Americans decided to get involved for their own reasons, yet you seemed blissfully unaware of that fact. Little of what you say made sense to me then and it still doesn't.
 
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
I think that the potential for another genocide in Europe is growing by the day.

Please stop saying things like that, you go on about it a lot, it is extremely unhelpful.

Last time we talked, you told me that _I_ wanted to genocide _you_ (or your whole race, or whatever) because I am from Europe... Of course, we (the British) were fighting the Nazi genocide well before the Americans decided to get involved for their own reasons, yet you seemed blissfully unaware of that fact. Little of what you say made sense to me then and it still doesn't.

Link? You probably misunderstood me. I don't deny that many in Europe would want to genocide undesirables, but I usually don't claim people on the forum want to kill.

Please don't pretend that the British were fighting the Nazis to stop a genocide. The British Empire was probably the most genocidal regime in the last couple of centuries. They participated in worldwide genocide, drug dealing, slavery, pillaging, etc. WW2 in Europe started before the Nazi extermination of undesirables.

It doesn't matter when the US got involved in WW2 in Europe. It was another European war. This is like saying the British never got involved in the US Civil War (oh, despite their support for the South). It has no relevance. Also, let's not pretend that the British went to war immediately. They declared war and then sat around while the Polish (their allies) got slaughtered.
 
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
You probably misunderstood me.

Nah, I said you should travel to Europe and form your own opinions, rather than spouting this rubbish you picked god knows where. You replied that you would never go to Europe as I would genocide you.

I don't deny that many in Europe would want to genocide undesirables

LOL, as if others are claiming this, and one should deny or support it. Only you are making this claim.

Please don't pretend that the British were fighting the Nazis to stop a genocide.

That is quite insulting. What is your theory then? You think we had something to gain from sending troops to the continent? All we gained was bombed out cities and food shortages, yet we still didn't surrender.

The British Empire was probably the most genocidal regime in the last couple of centuries. They participated in worldwide genocide, drug dealing, slavery, pillaging, etc.

Of course, silly me, I forgot all those times the British wiped out entire races... when was that again? The Empire was not very nice, of course, but people did a lot of conquering back then - all the major powers did.

Remember that not so long ago you (America) were English, and any critisim you give me due to the actions of the Empire are also applicable to you.

It doesn't matter when the US got involved in WW2 in Europe.

It doesn't seem to matter to you what the U.S. does in any circumstance, you always put it on a pedistal. Why can't you admit to some of America's flaws, amd maybe do something to fix those, instead of complaining about Europe.




 
Originally posted by: Atheus

Nah, I said you should travel to Europe and form your own opinions, rather than spouting this rubbish you picked god knows where. You replied that you would never go to Europe as I would genocide you.

I have been to Europe. Please provide me with the link that said that you would genocide me.

LOL, as if others are claiming this, and one should deny or support it. Only you are making this claim.

I am sure many of the growing far-right supremacists crave for genocide or other atrocities.

That is quite insulting. What is your theory then? You think we had something to gain from sending troops to the continent? All we gained was bombed out cities and food shortages, yet we still didn't surrender.

I am more interested in your theory. Are you claiming that the British employed psychics to predict the future and then went to war when they saw a genocide? Or maybe a time machine was involved?

Of course, silly me, I forgot all those times the British wiped out entire races... when was that again? The Empire was not very nice, of course, but people did a lot of conquering back then - all the major powers did.

The devastation that the British Empire brought upon the world is unparalleled in the last couple of centuries of history.

Where did I claim that they wiped out entire races? The Rwanda genocide happened yet there are still Tutsis. The British wiped out millions upon millions of people.

Remember that not so long ago you (America) were English, and any critisim you give me due to the actions of the Empire are also applicable to you.

Spread the blame, spread the blame!

It doesn't seem to matter to you what the U.S. does in any circumstance, you always put it on a pedistal. Why can't you admit to some of America's flaws, amd maybe do something to fix those, instead of complaining about Europe.

I do. Where have I stated that the US is perfect?

I think that this situation is more applicable to you. Somebody criticizes Europe, and you go berserk. Why? Why must Europe not be criticized? Why must it be put on a pedestal and the conditions contributing to the potential genocide be ignored?

This is the exact behavior which contributes to the problem. Europeans do not want to talk about the growing genocidal threat within. It is a problem that must be ignored, thus it continues to grow.

Why must Europe not be criticized? I've claimed before that I suspect it is because Europe has declined politically, militarilly, culturally, economically, etc. It was not long ago that Europe consisted of empires large and small which ruthlessly ruled the world, bringing slaughter to anyone who dare oppose them. Perhaps back in the 50s and 60s when the US was undergoing the civil rights era, Europeans clung onto the belief that they were morally superior because they didn't see the same problems in their own lands... until recently. Now, the situations are reversed, but if Europeans admit it, then they have lost their last sense of superiority.
 
Remember that not so long ago you (America) were English, and any critisim you give me due to the actions of the Empire are also applicable to you.

Um, no. Are you saying that because Hong Kong was ruled by a British empire that they're responsible for the actions of them? Or when the French ruled over Vietnam that the Vietnamese were responsible for their actions?
 
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Why must Europe not be criticized? I've claimed before that I suspect it is because Europe has declined politically, militarilly, culturally, economically, etc. It was not long ago that Europe consisted of empires large and small which ruthlessly ruled the world, bringing slaughter to anyone who dare oppose them. Perhaps back in the 50s and 60s when the US was undergoing the civil rights era, Europeans clung onto the belief that they were morally superior because they didn't see the same problems in their own lands... until recently. Now, the situations are reversed, but if Europeans admit it, then they have lost their last sense of superiority.

I see you are still wearing your tinfoil. Who is the culprit now? Leftist Terrorist, rapid german rightwingers or again all Europeans who are all racists anyway? At least make up your mind on who is going to do the genocide, otherwise it really gets too confusing for us.


BTW. Watch out! Europe is coming to get you...BUH! :laugh: :laugh:
 
Originally posted by: Pedro69
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Why must Europe not be criticized? I've claimed before that I suspect it is because Europe has declined politically, militarilly, culturally, economically, etc. It was not long ago that Europe consisted of empires large and small which ruthlessly ruled the world, bringing slaughter to anyone who dare oppose them. Perhaps back in the 50s and 60s when the US was undergoing the civil rights era, Europeans clung onto the belief that they were morally superior because they didn't see the same problems in their own lands... until recently. Now, the situations are reversed, but if Europeans admit it, then they have lost their last sense of superiority.

I see you are still wearing your tinfoil. Who is the culprit now? Leftist Terrorist, rapid german rightwingers or again all Europeans who are all racists anyway? At least make up your mind on who is going to do the genocide, otherwise it really gets too confusing for us.

BTW. Watch out! Europe is coming to get you...BUH! :laugh: :laugh:

Perhaps you have confused me with someone else. I have been rather consistent on my belief on the potential genocide. I will usually describe them as the far-right in regards to the main issue at hand (immigration, minorities, etc.). Most of Europe has drifted to the far-right on immigration, minority rights, etc. Just look into what is happening in France right now for an example. When a significant portion of the population turns to far-right ideas and racism, the politicians will embrace it.
 
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Perhaps you have confused me with someone else. I have been rather consistent on my belief on the potential genocide. I will usually describe them as the far-right in regards to the main issue at hand (immigration, minorities, etc.). Most of Europe has drifted to the far-right on immigration, minority rights, etc. Just look into what is happening in France right now for an example. When a significant portion of the population turns to far-right ideas and racism, the politicians will embrace it.

No I wasn't confusing you with someone esle. :laugh:
 
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
I think that the potential for another genocide in Europe is growing by the day.

Please stop saying things like that, you go on about it a lot, it is extremely unhelpful.

Last time we talked, you told me that _I_ wanted to genocide _you_ (or your whole race, or whatever) because I am from Europe... Of course, we (the British) were fighting the Nazi genocide well before the Americans decided to get involved for their own reasons, yet you seemed blissfully unaware of that fact. Little of what you say made sense to me then and it still doesn't.

Of course the US has flaws and has made many mistakes, but don't forget that WE were responsible for saving western europe from living under Hitler/Nazism for who knows how many years.
 
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: Atheus

Nah, I said you should travel to Europe and form your own opinions, rather than spouting this rubbish you picked god knows where. You replied that you would never go to Europe as I would genocide you.

I have been to Europe. Please provide me with the link that said that you would genocide me.

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...&STARTPAGE=2&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear

"I wouldn't feel comfortable in a society that wants to genocide me and views me as inferior."

Thar ya go. We do not want to genocide you, that's just dumb.

Sorry BTW, a slight misquote by me, you said you wouldn't _live_ in Europe. Didn't realise you had been there, didn't imagine you could have been, considering your apparent hate for the place.

LOL, as if others are claiming this, and one should deny or support it. Only you are making this claim.

I am sure many of the growing far-right supremacists crave for genocide or other atrocities.

I am sure the far right supremicists _everywhere_ crave all sorts of horrible things. That is not "many" in Europe .

That is quite insulting. What is your theory then? You think we had something to gain from sending troops to the continent? All we gained was bombed out cities and food shortages, yet we still didn't surrender.

I am more interested in your theory. Are you claiming that the British employed psychics to predict the future and then went to war when they saw a genocide? Or maybe a time machine was involved?

Although the Nazis had not implemented (or even concieved, probably) their 'final solution' at the start of the war, their view of other races as inferior was quite well known. The war was started in order to stop the continent being taken over by fascists and racists, and therefore avoid such things as genocide.

You surely cannot believe we had some sort of evil motives can you?

Of course, silly me, I forgot all those times the British wiped out entire races... when was that again? The Empire was not very nice, of course, but people did a lot of conquering back then - all the major powers did.

The devastation that the British Empire brought upon the world is unparalleled in the last couple of centuries of history.

Where did I claim that they wiped out entire races? The Rwanda genocide happened yet there are still Tutsis. The British wiped out millions upon millions of people.

Well, that's what a genocide is isn't it? The attempt to wipe out an entire race? I think the Empire was much more interested in enslaving them. As was the United States.

Remember that not so long ago you (America) were English, and any critisim you give me due to the actions of the Empire are also applicable to you.

Spread the blame, spread the blame!

What, exactly am I to blame for? Both our ancestors (assuming your family is American for many generations) were in the British Empire, and neither of us are to blame for their actions.

It doesn't seem to matter to you what the U.S. does in any circumstance, you always put it on a pedistal. Why can't you admit to some of America's flaws, amd maybe do something to fix those, instead of complaining about Europe.

I do. Where have I stated that the US is perfect?

You didn't, I didn't say you did, but you seem to think it is far superior to everywhere else, i.e. putting it on a pedistal.

I think that this situation is more applicable to you. Somebody criticizes Europe, and you go berserk. Why? Why must Europe not be criticized? Why must it be put on a pedestal and the conditions contributing to the potential genocide be ignored?

This is the exact behavior which contributes to the problem. Europeans do not want to talk about the growing genocidal threat within. It is a problem that must be ignored, thus it continues to grow.

You aren't just critisizing Europe, you are ruthlessly slamming Europe. I would happily discuss with you the recent growth of the BNP in England, or racist German football fans, but you blow it all _way_ out of proportion.

Why must Europe not be criticized? I've claimed before that I suspect it is because Europe has declined politically, militarilly, culturally, economically, etc. It was not long ago that Europe consisted of empires large and small which ruthlessly ruled the world, bringing slaughter to anyone who dare oppose them. Perhaps back in the 50s and 60s when the US was undergoing the civil rights era, Europeans clung onto the belief that they were morally superior because they didn't see the same problems in their own lands... until recently. Now, the situations are reversed, but if Europeans admit it, then they have lost their last sense of superiority.

There is an example right there of putting the US on a pedistal. In the 50s and 60s many (truly many) Americans were rampant racists and clearly wanted to exterminate black people. Yet you somehow turn this back on me? You compare modern Europe to post-war America in terms of civil rights? Please post all the church burnings and child killings so I can make a comparison. I'll be sure to watch for Muslims being made to sit at the back of the bus too.

And Europe is actually not declining economiacally - GDP is clearly increasing, check anywhere you like.


 
Originally posted by: Syringer
Remember that not so long ago you (America) were English, and any critisim you give me due to the actions of the Empire are also applicable to you.

Um, no. Are you saying that because Hong Kong was ruled by a British empire that they're responsible for the actions of them? Or when the French ruled over Vietnam that the Vietnamese were responsible for their actions?

Not at all. Quite the opposite 🙂 Britain created a colony in America and filled it with Brits who were just as responsible for the Emipre as every other Brit. Obviously after independence they weren't British any more, but that didn't change their ancestry.

I am saying that I am _not_ responsible for the actions of the Empire, just because I am their descendent, and neither is any American who is descended from the same people.
 
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
I think that the potential for another genocide in Europe is growing by the day.

Please stop saying things like that, you go on about it a lot, it is extremely unhelpful.

Last time we talked, you told me that _I_ wanted to genocide _you_ (or your whole race, or whatever) because I am from Europe... Of course, we (the British) were fighting the Nazi genocide well before the Americans decided to get involved for their own reasons, yet you seemed blissfully unaware of that fact. Little of what you say made sense to me then and it still doesn't.

Of course the US has flaws and has made many mistakes, but don't forget that WE were responsible for saving western europe from living under Hitler/Nazism for who knows how many years.

And us too remember 🙂, the D-day landings were about 50-50 American and British, with a good number of Canadians and Australians thrown in too.
 
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
I find your outlook and reasoning to be shall we say entertaining yet when one thinks about what you are saying thats hardly the truth!!
Huh? Assuming I can interpret your mangled sentence, you're disagreeing with at least one, if not all, of the following assertions:
1. The US is not the best soccer team in the world.
2. You have to be in reasonable shape to play soccer.
3. Soccer is presented commercial-free, making it less like other, more 'Americanized' sports where fans can grab a cold one during the downtime between plays/innings.

So, which is it?
 
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
I think that the potential for another genocide in Europe is growing by the day.

Please stop saying things like that, you go on about it a lot, it is extremely unhelpful.

Last time we talked, you told me that _I_ wanted to genocide _you_ (or your whole race, or whatever) because I am from Europe... Of course, we (the British) were fighting the Nazi genocide well before the Americans decided to get involved for their own reasons, yet you seemed blissfully unaware of that fact. Little of what you say made sense to me then and it still doesn't.

Of course the US has flaws and has made many mistakes, but don't forget that WE were responsible for saving western europe from living under Hitler/Nazism for who knows how many years.



You may want to read about ww2, the russians are the ones that took the nazis down, we came in and mopped up at the last minute before the russians grabbed all of it.

United States Casualties (Including pacific theatre) 407,300

USSR Casualties 10,700,000

Germany 5,500,000


There is literally no comparison, the germans were long since doomed before we came into the picture.

 
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
I find your outlook and reasoning to be shall we say entertaining yet when one thinks about what you are saying thats hardly the truth!!
Huh? Assuming I can interpret your mangled sentence, you're disagreeing with at least one, if not all, of the following assertions:
1. The US is not the best soccer team in the world.
2. You have to be in reasonable shape to play soccer.
3. Soccer is presented commercial-free, making it less like other, more 'Americanized' sports where fans can grab a cold one during the downtime between plays/innings.

So, which is it?

I'd really like to beileve you, but no way... Are you serious? I guess I'll just have to watch the world cup. 😀
 
Originally posted by: Atheus

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...&STARTPAGE=2&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear

"I wouldn't feel comfortable in a society that wants to genocide me and views me as inferior."

Thar ya go. We do not want to genocide you, that's just dumb.

Sorry BTW, a slight misquote by me, you said you wouldn't _live_ in Europe. Didn't realise you had been there, didn't imagine you could have been, considering your apparent hate for the place.

That does not say that I think that you in particular want to kill me.

I am sure the far right supremicists _everywhere_ crave all sorts of horrible things. That is not "many" in Europe .

The far-right is quite strong in Europe though, and powerful politically. From support for Le Pen in France (recent polls provide scary results), Denmark, Switzerland, etc. Do you think that Germany would actually propose concentration camps in the African desert for refugees if there was not a powerful far-right element in the government/society?

Although the Nazis had not implemented (or even concieved, probably) their 'final solution' at the start of the war, their view of other races as inferior was quite well known. The war was started in order to stop the continent being taken over by fascists and racists, and therefore avoid such things as genocide.

The British Empire's view of their slaves (those oppressed in their colonies) was quite well known, too. Nobody went to war to stop a genocide in WW2.

You surely cannot believe we had some sort of evil motives can you?

Where did I say here that they had an evil motive in WW2?

Well, that's what a genocide is isn't it? The attempt to wipe out an entire race? I think the Empire was much more interested in enslaving them. As was the United States.

Enslavement was often accompanied by a genocide.

What, exactly am I to blame for? Both our ancestors (assuming your family is American for many generations) were in the British Empire, and neither of us are to blame for their actions.

I am not blaming you for anything.

No, my family has not been American for many generations. The vast majority of current British are not responsible for anything the Empire did. However, the government is responsible.

You didn't, I didn't say you did, but you seem to think it is far superior to everywhere else, i.e. putting it on a pedistal.

In regards to minorities, immigrants, etc. it is near the top (along with Canada). If you want to talk about gays, it definitely is not. I am sure that there are many other issues where it is not superior.

You aren't just critisizing Europe, you are ruthlessly slamming Europe. I would happily discuss with you the recent growth of the BNP in England, or racist German football fans, but you blow it all _way_ out of proportion.

Funny, I think that you are completely underestimating the situation.

There is an example right there of putting the US on a pedistal. In the 50s and 60s many (truly many) Americans were rampant racists and clearly wanted to exterminate black people. Yet you somehow turn this back on me? You compare modern Europe to post-war America in terms of civil rights?

Yes, I do believe that Europe is roughly in the equivalent era of civil rights as the US in the 60s or maybe 70s. They are decades behind now, and unfortunately many of the people don't seem to want to be progressive about the issue.

Please post all the church burnings and child killings so I can make a comparison.

Many buildings (mosques, churches, schools, etc.) were burned in the Netherlands following Theo Van Gogh's assassination.

I'll be sure to watch for Muslims being made to sit at the back of the bus too.

The issue involves more than just Muslims. Many minorities have been pushed out of cities into the suburbs in Europe. I posted a thread about the Chinese in Rome and the attempt to try to force them to go to the suburbs.

We are posting in a thread about Germany... a country which until 2000 didn't even let people with non-German blood become citizens. A country where 40% of the population wants to restrict freedom of religion and 56% support a ban on the building of mosques.

And Europe is actually not declining economiacally - GDP is clearly increasing, check anywhere you like.

Europe's economic power is declining in respect to the rest of the world. Nobody thinks about Europe when they think of the future world economic powers. They think of the US, China, India, etc. Europe has an aging, shrinking population.
 
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
I think that the potential for another genocide in Europe is growing by the day.

Please stop saying things like that, you go on about it a lot, it is extremely unhelpful.

Last time we talked, you told me that _I_ wanted to genocide _you_ (or your whole race, or whatever) because I am from Europe... Of course, we (the British) were fighting the Nazi genocide well before the Americans decided to get involved for their own reasons, yet you seemed blissfully unaware of that fact. Little of what you say made sense to me then and it still doesn't.

Of course the US has flaws and has made many mistakes, but don't forget that WE were responsible for saving western europe from living under Hitler/Nazism for who knows how many years.



You may want to read about ww2, the russians are the ones that took the nazis down, we came in and mopped up at the last minute before the russians grabbed all of it.

United States Casualties (Including pacific theatre) 407,300

USSR Casualties 10,700,000

The number of deaths doesn't really mean much, nor any other single statistic.

US industry + Soviet manpower + British resolve + probably many other factors = WW2 win in Europe
 
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
I think that the potential for another genocide in Europe is growing by the day.

Please stop saying things like that, you go on about it a lot, it is extremely unhelpful.

Last time we talked, you told me that _I_ wanted to genocide _you_ (or your whole race, or whatever) because I am from Europe... Of course, we (the British) were fighting the Nazi genocide well before the Americans decided to get involved for their own reasons, yet you seemed blissfully unaware of that fact. Little of what you say made sense to me then and it still doesn't.

Of course the US has flaws and has made many mistakes, but don't forget that WE were responsible for saving western europe from living under Hitler/Nazism for who knows how many years.



You may want to read about ww2, the russians are the ones that took the nazis down, we came in and mopped up at the last minute before the russians grabbed all of it.

United States Casualties (Including pacific theatre) 407,300

USSR Casualties 10,700,000

The number of deaths doesn't really mean much, nor any other single statistic.

US industry + Soviet manpower + British resolve + probably many other factors = WW2 win in Europe



US industry was not a major factor for the soviets, the UK, yes.

But yeah, the nazis got stomped, but then the soviets were not all that great either, WW2 was a draw really in europe. At least we saved some of europe before it was too late. (That which we didnt bomb to rubble)
 
Originally posted by: Steeplerot

US industry was not a major factor for the soviets, the UK, yes.

US deliveries to the Soviet Union:

Aircraft.............................14,795
Tanks.................................7,056
Jeeps................................51,503
Trucks..............................375,883
Motorcycles..........................35,170
Tractors..............................8,071
Railroad freight cars................11,155
Locomotives...........................1,981
Cargo ships..............................90
Submarine hunters.......................105
Torpedo boats...........................197
Ship engines..........................7,784

Lend-Lease Act

For example, the USSR was highly dependent on trains, yet the desperate need to produce weapons meant that fewer than 20 new locomotives were produced in the USSR during the entire war. In this context, the supply of 1,981 US locomotives can be better understood. Likewise, the Soviet air force was almost completely dependent on US supplies of very high octane aviation fuel. Although most Red Army tank units were equipped with Soviet-built tanks, their logistical support was provided by hundreds of thousands of high-quality US-made trucks. Indeed by 1944 nearly half the truck strength of the Red Army was US-built. Trucks such as the Dodge 3/4 ton and Studebaker 2.5 ton, were easily the best trucks available in their class on either side on the Eastern Front. US supplies of waterproof telephone cable, aluminium, and canned rations were also critical.
 
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: Steeplerot

US industry was not a major factor for the soviets, the UK, yes.

US deliveries to the Soviet Union:

Aircraft.............................14,795
Tanks.................................7,056
Jeeps................................51,503
Trucks..............................375,883
Motorcycles..........................35,170
Tractors..............................8,071
Railroad freight cars................11,155
Locomotives...........................1,981
Cargo ships..............................90
Submarine hunters.......................105
Torpedo boats...........................197
Ship engines..........................7,784

Lend-Lease Act

For example, the USSR was highly dependent on trains, yet the desperate need to produce weapons meant that fewer than 20 new locomotives were produced in the USSR during the entire war. In this context, the supply of 1,981 US locomotives can be better understood. Likewise, the Soviet air force was almost completely dependent on US supplies of very high octane aviation fuel. Although most Red Army tank units were equipped with Soviet-built tanks, their logistical support was provided by hundreds of thousands of high-quality US-made trucks. Indeed by 1944 nearly half the truck strength of the Red Army was US-built. Trucks such as the Dodge 3/4 ton and Studebaker 2.5 ton, were easily the best trucks available in their class on either side on the Eastern Front. US supplies of waterproof telephone cable, aluminium, and canned rations were also critical.



The trucks and locomotives were important, but they do not win wars alone. And this is over the whole war you speak of too, at the end the german navy was crushed so of course we got a good amount of supplies in to help them, but by this point soviet tanks were rolling the nazis up good.

(I wonder how many of those old trucks are still around -this is interesting facts here heh you learn something every day)
 
Originally posted by: Steeplerot

The trucks and locomotives were important, but they do not win wars alone. And this is over the whole war you speak of too, at the end the german navy was crushed so of course we got a good amount of supplies in to help them, but by this point soviet tanks were rolling the nazis up good.

(I wonder how many of those old trucks are still around -this is interesting facts here heh you learn something every day)

I am guessing that nothing wins wars alone. I am simply disputing your statement that US industry was not important for the Soviets.
 
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: Steeplerot

The trucks and locomotives were important, but they do not win wars alone. And this is over the whole war you speak of too, at the end the german navy was crushed so of course we got a good amount of supplies in to help them, but by this point soviet tanks were rolling the nazis up good.

(I wonder how many of those old trucks are still around -this is interesting facts here heh you learn something every day)

I am guessing that nothing wins wars alone. I am simply disputing your statement that US industry was not important for the Soviets.



Well, I stand corrected on locos and trucks, curious how long it took the flow to open up during the course of the war.
 
*wipes away sweat, prepares for final round*

Originally posted by: CanOWorms
The far-right is quite strong in Europe though, and powerful politically. From support for Le Pen in France (recent polls provide scary results), Denmark, Switzerland, etc. Do you think that Germany would actually propose concentration camps in the African desert for refugees if there was not a powerful far-right element in the government/society?

Fair point, the far right are growing in Europe. Membership of such groups has grown from fractions of a percent to slightly larger fractions of a percent. This does not equal genocide or any other kind of impending doom.

I am not blaming you for anything.

Really? My mistake, all the "spread the blame!" stuff may have indicated to me that there was blame to spread from myself to someone else :roll:

In regards to minorities, immigrants, etc. it is near the top (along with Canada). If you want to talk about gays, it definitely is not. I am sure that there are many other issues where it is not superior.

I'd say a genocide in Europe is about as likely as gays being rounded up in America and sent to concentraton camps.

The issue involves more than just Muslims. Many minorities have been pushed out of cities into the suburbs in Europe. I posted a thread about the Chinese in Rome and the attempt to try to force them to go to the suburbs.

So there will be a kind of generalized meta-genocide involving everyone who's not white?...

We are posting in a thread about Germany... a country which until 2000 didn't even let people with non-German blood become citizens. A country where 40% of the population wants to restrict freedom of religion and 56% support a ban on the building of mosques.

I feel no urge to defend this. But it does not mean genocide is round the corner.

Take a section of the US about as big as germany. Perhaps somewhere in the bible belt, perhaps Texas. How many do you think would support a ban on the building of mosques? How many more if some politician got them fired up about mosques being training centers for terrorists? That Morgan Spurlock 30-days thing makes me think quite a few.

I'm going offline for a while. If there's a genocide while I'm gone, let me know.

 
Back
Top