Rabble rabble, rumor...

Artdeco

Platinum Member
Mar 14, 2015
2,682
1
0
Holy crap, tenuous and unlikely...

iMessage may come to Android

http://appleinsider.com/articles/16/06/09/rumor-apple-to-debut-imessage-for-android-at-wwdc-2016

http://macdailynews.com/2016/06/09/apple-to-deliver-imessage-to-android-at-wwdc/

Apple will announce that iMessage encrypted text messaging is coming to Android users at WWDC next Monday at WWDC 2016, according to a source familiar with the company’s thinking.

This will make it possible for Android and iOS users to communicate securely as iMessage features end-to-end encryption – even Apple cannot access users’ messages. Currently, iMessage is accessible through the Messages app on an iPhone, iPad or iPod touch running iOS 5 or later or on a Mac running OS X Mountain Lion or later. In February, Eddie Cue announced that the number of iMessages sent surpassed 200,000 per second.

Apple is increasingly focused on services which means opening up certain avenues beyond its own iOS and OS X platforms, the source says, specifically noting reports of Apple adding person-to-person Apple Pay payments via Messages. The company released Apple Music for Android last November.

The source notes that plans are constantly in flux leading up to Apple keynotes and the timing of the announcement could change, but that the iMessage instant messenger service would “definitely” be coming to Android this year. As this is a single-sourced item, it’s been filed under “rumor.”

MacDailyNews Take: Such a move would be welcomed by those of us who have to communicate with those who’ve settled for a lesser, derivative platform and would love to finally be able to do so via Wi-Fi and without having to be subjected to those horrid green bubbles from the Hee Haw demographic.
 
Last edited:

sweenish

Diamond Member
May 21, 2013
3,656
60
91
I don't see what they gain.

It's not a subscription service, it would add a lot of extra load to their servers, and they don't even farm information to sell.
 

QueBert

Lifer
Jan 6, 2002
22,946
1,138
126
I don't see what they gain.

It's not a subscription service, it would add a lot of extra load to their servers, and they don't even farm information to sell.

Don't know why either, but would LOVE if this is true. Going from iMessenger to sending regular SMS's on Android is the pits for me. No 160 character limit, delivery and read notification. And the fact you can send 50 second high quality video clips. All that on my Flex 2? YES PLEASE.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
32,883
11,026
136
I don't see what they gain.

It's not a subscription service, it would add a lot of extra load to their servers, and they don't even farm information to sell.
Because their market share is too low to continue using a proprietary messenger that doesn't communicate with the vast majority of smartphone users.
 

Artdeco

Platinum Member
Mar 14, 2015
2,682
1
0
Because their market share is too low to continue using a proprietary messenger that doesn't communicate with the vast majority of smartphone users.

Yep, people who use iMessage are frustrated that they can't easily message 80% of other phones...
 

Red Storm

Lifer
Oct 2, 2005
14,233
234
106
Everyone I know uses Hangouts, Whatsapp, or Telegram. However, it's nice to see Apple following in Google's steps and bringing their services to other platforms.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
32,883
11,026
136
Everyone I know uses Hangouts, Whatsapp, or Telegram. However, it's nice to see Apple following in Google's steps and bringing their services to other platforms.

Would it be so hard to use a common standard for messages? We do it for email why doesn't it happen for messages?
 

poofyhairguy

Lifer
Nov 20, 2005
14,612
318
126
At this point I feel like part of my identity to my friends and family is "the green bubble." When I got an iPhone 6s Plus the first thing I did was turn off iMessage. Green bubble 4 lyfe!

I get that for some people it will be a big deal, and expanding iMessage might be huge for Apple is Facebook is right and "the next big thing" is chat commerce via bots or something else.
 

poofyhairguy

Lifer
Nov 20, 2005
14,612
318
126
Sort of. SMS isn't a data messaging thingy, so while it has the advantage of not needing a data connection or a good signal it has the disadvantage of having limited characters, no pictures or any other files.

I am not saying it's the best case, just saying its the standard.

But data messaging services aren't under the control of the phone companies.

Which is exactly why SMS is still around, the phone companies missed the boat on what replaced it and they don't want to admit that.

If What'sApp was some venture joint owned by AT&T and Verizon it would be new standard today.
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,739
454
126
Would it be so hard to use a common standard for messages? We do it for email why doesn't it happen for messages?
I've always wondered why we all don't just use email. It's universal, not limited, and everybody has it on their phone at all times
 

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,820
136
I've always wondered why we all don't just use email. It's universal, not limited, and everybody has it on their phone at all times

Because it's virtually impossible to conduct a real-time chat through email.
 

sweenish

Diamond Member
May 21, 2013
3,656
60
91
I'm SO surprised that this wasn't mentioned at all during the WWDC presser.