QX6700 vs Dual Xeon 5140

issaid

Junior Member
Nov 10, 2003
12
0
0
I do video editing and 3d animation in 3ds max and Lightwave 3D. I am loooking to upgrade to a new workstation as we all know they are never fast enough. i'm going to do some incorrect math here, but with teh new Core architechure it's not that off.

QX6700=> 4x2.67Ghz => 10.6Ghz

2xXeon 5140 => 4x2.33Ghz =>9.3Ghz

From what I've read, the Xeons get the 2xFSB unless I'm wrong. These systems would cost about the same, but I'm curious about which would perform better. Once advantage of a Xeon system is that I can change to a faster quad core later. I'm not one to normally upgrade, I usually jsut build a new system.

There is also the new Quad Xeon's, but they clock in at 1.8ghz, and are super expensive,
but with this poor math example clocks in at 14.4Ghz. I know these numbers aren't right, but if you look at the ratios of the clocks on all the benchmarks you can pretty much do this to get a ball park. So what are the other advantages to the Xeon system.

I guess you could compare without cost at this point the 5150s to the QX6700 as each core in both processors is 2.66Ghz. Would the Xeon perform better? Then factoring in cost, the Xeon would also be much more expensive as it requires Fully Buffered Memory.

One advantage over with the Qx6700 for me, is if I decided to upgrade my current system, I would just need the proc and motherboard.

I really can't decide what is the best alternative. Or should I really just make myself wait til things are cheaper, but then the next architecture will be out ;-)!

Thanks.
 

issaid

Junior Member
Nov 10, 2003
12
0
0
I can't believe no one has replied. What if I make a simpler question?!?

Dual Xeon 5150 vs QX6700. Each core is 2.67Ghz? Would the Xeon config peform that much better?
So both systems are 4x2.67Ghz. Any help is much appreciated.
 

The-Noid

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2005
3,117
4
76
Woodcrest takes FB-DIMMS. They bottleneck the system under most situations. The QX6700 will win more than likely. Hopefully FB-800 Dimms will come soon than it iwill be much closer.
 

issaid

Junior Member
Nov 10, 2003
12
0
0
Thanks for your input. I wasn't expecting that, but I believe you guys. I really don't know much about the FB-DIMMS and their higher price. I think I'll go QX6700. Thanks a bunch.
 

Ayah

Platinum Member
Jan 1, 2006
2,512
1
81
Originally posted by: issaid
Thanks for your input. I wasn't expecting that, but I believe you guys. I really don't know much about the FB-DIMMS and their higher price. I think I'll go QX6700. Thanks a bunch.

FB-DIMMS are slow, high latency, run hot and cost an arm and a leg.
 

gsellis

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2003
6,061
0
0
I use Animation:Master and until V14 (which is Alpha right now), it was not multi-threaded. The kick butt thing to do was start 3 instances and have each do a 1/3 of my timeline (2x3.06 Xeons w/ HT). More cores for the win.
 

issaid

Junior Member
Nov 10, 2003
12
0
0
Luckily for me Lightwave and 3ds max take great advantage of multiple threads. I believe lightwave can handle of to 16 different threads. Sony Vegas supports up to 4. Seems teh only advantage with the Xeons would be the quad xeons to be able to get 8 cores. But that probably wouldn't be practical until they were faster than 1.8ghz next quarter.