Originally posted by: dragonfang
it is outside of the quotes in MLA format
My copy of A Writer's Resource published by McGraw-Hill says differently.
Originally posted by: dragonfang
it is outside of the quotes in MLA format
Originally posted by: Tuktuk
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Tuktuk
I don't see why there is so much complaint over this. To me it seems logical for the period to be within the quotes. The period seems to be floating outside of the sentence when placed outside the quotes, as my eye naturally looks for the period touching the last letter in the sentence.
John went up the tree.
John went up the tree .
John went up the "tree."
John went up the "tree".
The period is too far removed from the sentence IMO.
It's more logical for the period to be after the quotes unless the period is related to what is in the quotes. However it's English, what's logical is rarely what's correct. And here in the US, we put the period in the quotes.
What you mean is that it looks nicer when the period is in the quotes. Meh.
No, I mean it is more logical. The point of a period is for me to close off the end of the statement in my mind while reading it. If the period is outside the quotes, it delays that closing and makes the period less effective. To me the period is better used after the last letter of the sentence, rather than after the quote. That is why I explained the visible element.
Originally posted by: yankeesfan
F*ck proper writing rules. I'll use punctuation the way that I want.
Originally posted by: Tuktuk
Originally posted by: yankeesfan
F*ck proper writing rules. I'll use punctuation the way that I want.
Yea!! Fvck grammar proper who use they stupid me talk how want I they see they dumb in end say I!! Fools be they?Isay?!!?!?!yES it is TRUE I SAY CAPS aRe to BE USED randomly fOR IAM THE CREATOR of puNCtuation LaW. What is the point of proper grammar and punctuation?
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Tuktuk
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Tuktuk
I don't see why there is so much complaint over this. To me it seems logical for the period to be within the quotes. The period seems to be floating outside of the sentence when placed outside the quotes, as my eye naturally looks for the period touching the last letter in the sentence.
John went up the tree.
John went up the tree .
John went up the "tree."
John went up the "tree".
The period is too far removed from the sentence IMO.
It's more logical for the period to be after the quotes unless the period is related to what is in the quotes. However it's English, what's logical is rarely what's correct. And here in the US, we put the period in the quotes.
What you mean is that it looks nicer when the period is in the quotes. Meh.
No, I mean it is more logical. The point of a period is for me to close off the end of the statement in my mind while reading it. If the period is outside the quotes, it delays that closing and makes the period less effective. To me the period is better used after the last letter of the sentence, rather than after the quote. That is why I explained the visible element.
Delays the closing of the sentence? Do you read character by character?![]()
Originally posted by: Tuktuk
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Tuktuk
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Tuktuk
I don't see why there is so much complaint over this. To me it seems logical for the period to be within the quotes. The period seems to be floating outside of the sentence when placed outside the quotes, as my eye naturally looks for the period touching the last letter in the sentence.
John went up the tree.
John went up the tree .
John went up the "tree."
John went up the "tree".
The period is too far removed from the sentence IMO.
It's more logical for the period to be after the quotes unless the period is related to what is in the quotes. However it's English, what's logical is rarely what's correct. And here in the US, we put the period in the quotes.
What you mean is that it looks nicer when the period is in the quotes. Meh.
No, I mean it is more logical. The point of a period is for me to close off the end of the statement in my mind while reading it. If the period is outside the quotes, it delays that closing and makes the period less effective. To me the period is better used after the last letter of the sentence, rather than after the quote. That is why I explained the visible element.
Delays the closing of the sentence? Do you read character by character?![]()
Ha.. no, I just find the natural flow of writing is better kept when the period is kept in a stable spot and not sometimes floating outside the end of a sentence. It is very important for a sentence to close immediately when reading, and I feel that punctuation after the quote leaves a gap, however tiny, in the closing of a sentence. Even the tiniest gap has a bad effect and that is why I agree with the current rules.
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Tuktuk
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Tuktuk
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Tuktuk
I don't see why there is so much complaint over this. To me it seems logical for the period to be within the quotes. The period seems to be floating outside of the sentence when placed outside the quotes, as my eye naturally looks for the period touching the last letter in the sentence.
John went up the tree.
John went up the tree .
John went up the "tree."
John went up the "tree".
The period is too far removed from the sentence IMO.
It's more logical for the period to be after the quotes unless the period is related to what is in the quotes. However it's English, what's logical is rarely what's correct. And here in the US, we put the period in the quotes.
What you mean is that it looks nicer when the period is in the quotes. Meh.
No, I mean it is more logical. The point of a period is for me to close off the end of the statement in my mind while reading it. If the period is outside the quotes, it delays that closing and makes the period less effective. To me the period is better used after the last letter of the sentence, rather than after the quote. That is why I explained the visible element.
Delays the closing of the sentence? Do you read character by character?![]()
Ha.. no, I just find the natural flow of writing is better kept when the period is kept in a stable spot and not sometimes floating outside the end of a sentence. It is very important for a sentence to close immediately when reading, and I feel that punctuation after the quote leaves a gap, however tiny, in the closing of a sentence. Even the tiniest gap has a bad effect and that is why I agree with the current rules.
I think you're a little anal.
FWIW, my reasoning for thinking it's more logical to put it outside the quotes is because the quotes make whatever is inside the quotes a single entity, and unless that entity is a complete sentence it shouldn't have a period at the end. Not to mention that putting the punctuation inside the quotes can change what you're quoting, i.e.: My password is "banana." But my password is "banana" without the period.
Originally posted by: Whisper
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Tuktuk
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Tuktuk
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Tuktuk
I don't see why there is so much complaint over this. To me it seems logical for the period to be within the quotes. The period seems to be floating outside of the sentence when placed outside the quotes, as my eye naturally looks for the period touching the last letter in the sentence.
John went up the tree.
John went up the tree .
John went up the "tree."
John went up the "tree".
The period is too far removed from the sentence IMO.
It's more logical for the period to be after the quotes unless the period is related to what is in the quotes. However it's English, what's logical is rarely what's correct. And here in the US, we put the period in the quotes.
What you mean is that it looks nicer when the period is in the quotes. Meh.
No, I mean it is more logical. The point of a period is for me to close off the end of the statement in my mind while reading it. If the period is outside the quotes, it delays that closing and makes the period less effective. To me the period is better used after the last letter of the sentence, rather than after the quote. That is why I explained the visible element.
Delays the closing of the sentence? Do you read character by character?![]()
Ha.. no, I just find the natural flow of writing is better kept when the period is kept in a stable spot and not sometimes floating outside the end of a sentence. It is very important for a sentence to close immediately when reading, and I feel that punctuation after the quote leaves a gap, however tiny, in the closing of a sentence. Even the tiniest gap has a bad effect and that is why I agree with the current rules.
I think you're a little anal.
FWIW, my reasoning for thinking it's more logical to put it outside the quotes is because the quotes make whatever is inside the quotes a single entity, and unless that entity is a complete sentence it shouldn't have a period at the end. Not to mention that putting the punctuation inside the quotes can change what you're quoting, i.e.: My password is "banana." But my password is "banana" without the period.
You can generally make mild changes to quoted material without having to indicate that you've done so (such as changing the first letter of a quoted phrase from capital to lowercase and vice-versa, changing ending punctuation, etc.)
If you'd written the sentence you originally used as an example (i.e., my password is "banana."), it would be assumed that your password was "banana" and that the period was ending the sentence. If your password also included a period, the correct way to write the sentence would be "my password is 'banana..'"
Generally, the punctuation is included inside the parenthesis (in the US). There are some exceptions, such as if you're going to cite a source at the end of the quotation (i.e., "Pretend I'm saying something worthy of a citation" (Marks & Smith, 1995).)
Periods and commas are always included inside the quotation marks (except, as stated, when followed by a citation). Colons and semi-colons are placed outside the quotation marks. Question marks and exclamation points are placed inside the quotation marks when a part of the originally-quoted material, and outside the quotation marks if applying to the sentence as a whole.
If you need more info, go here
Finally, and this is just something I'm anal about now because my Freshman English teacher drilled it into my brain, the proper term is quotation. The word quote is a verb, and should only be used as such.
Ahahahaha.. yeah, that's ridiculous. Surely no one actually does this. :QOriginally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: Whisper
If you'd written the sentence you originally used as an example (i.e., my password is "banana."), it would be assumed that your password was "banana" and that the period was ending the sentence. If your password also included a period, the correct way to write the sentence would be "my password is 'banana..'"
WTF are you talking about???? thats completely retarded.
Sh!t SonOriginally posted by: RichUK
Tut tut, yet another example of Americans butchering the English language.
The full stop (or period) in this case ends the entire sentence; therefore the full stop is placed outside of the quotations.
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Sh!t SonOriginally posted by: RichUK
Tut tut, yet another example of Americans butchering the English language.
The full stop (or period) in this case ends the entire sentence; therefore the full stop is placed outside of the quotations.
Originally posted by: smack Down
It goes inside the quotes otherwise you will confuse the complier. I really don't see how anyone could be confused on this.
Originally posted by: RichUK
Tut tut, yet another example of Americans butchering the English language.
The full stop (or period) in this case ends the entire sentence; therefore the full stop is placed outside of the quotations.
Originally posted by: smack Down
It goes inside the quotes otherwise you will confuse the complier. I really don't see how anyone could be confused on this.
Originally posted by: Aikouka
Originally posted by: RichUK
Tut tut, yet another example of Americans butchering the English language.
The full stop (or period) in this case ends the entire sentence; therefore the full stop is placed outside of the quotations.
Because you actually pronounce the end-quote, huh?
Oh and punctuation typically goes outside of parenthesis if the parenthesis are used in a sentence.
Semi-colons and colons don't go inside quotes.
