Ok, here is the speed chart for non OCed dual core chips:
(1.8Ghz,2M Cache) Opteron 165
(2.0Ghz,1M Cache) X2 3800+
(2.0Ghz,2M Cache) Opteron 170
(2.2Ghz,1M Cache) X2 4200+
(2.2Ghz,2M Cache) X2 4400+ == Opteron 175
(2.4Ghz,1M Cache) X2 4600+
(2.4Ghz,2M Cache) X2 4800+ == Opteron 180
(2.6Ghz,2M Cache) Opteron 185 == FX-60
FX 60 has no multipler, while the 185 does, but at stock they should perform identically. Generally opterons are considered the better OCing chips compared to the X2's, but honestly, its largely based on luck if you purchase from someone like newegg. Also the FX-60 is considered the best OCing chip.
I personally love the 170, as its a 10x multiplier chip which makes OCing cake, and its the only 10x chip that has the 2M cache.