Don't all these new updated add features and ultimately slow down the phone?
If someone doesn't need the latest features, would an older version, like Eclair, run faster?
True, waiting for this to somehow blow into an apple vs android debate! :whiste:theres no such thing as a quick question in this forum.
I'm running it on my Vibrant, which is older hardware. There are some places where it is faster - web browsing, for example, is like night and day, and the UI is generally more fluid. There are some things that are slower - I notice that launching apps takes a more time, and multitasking performance isn't nearly as good.
I presume that, while ICS might have better memory management, a lot of it just uses more memory, resulting in less available, albeit better managed, memory. This could easily cause both of the performance issues I noted.
To an extend. On the same phone, for example, an SGS2, ICS will likely run faster than GB on many things because the phone's hardware is able to take full advantage of ICS. A Droid X2, with only a Tegra 2 and 512MB of RAM wouldn't see as large of a benefit.
From personal experience, I will definitely say that on HC tablets that were upgraded to ICS, ICS is a substantial improvement across the board.
zerogear said:Better memory management, generally faster vs GB of the same spec. If the phone is too old though, it might indeed slow it down.
GB???? Really????ICS seems faster to me on my Asus Transformer than GB did. Although the difference is minimal to me.