Quick HTML question

[plastick]

Basically I am trying to make an image a link on a page of mine. WHen I do this and then view the resulting page, I see that there is an ugly boarder around the image that is an active link. I dont think its an actual boarder...Its just like when you make a text link and it turns a color because of the active link settings (alink="#ffffff" vlink....etc) and its kinda doing that with the image.

This is stupid! How do I get rid of it?

 

[rh71]

img src = "blah.jpg" border = "0"

add the border part

 

[dighn]

<img border="0"...

 

[Barnaby W. Füi]

Put this:

a img {
border: none;
}

in your css. And you should use css instead of that vlink alink crap; welcome to the mid 90s. 😉

 

[rh71]

I wish all css attributes were more standardized across all browsers already. :roll: Then I'd actually have a reason to learn it. I just use reference sites/books when I need it... then decipher how to make it work for every scenario. That gets another :roll:.

 

[AFB]

inline style


<a href="#" ><img src="pic.jpg" style="border:none;" > </a>

 

[plastick]

Thanks!!!

You guys are awesome!

 

[MrCodeDude]

Originally posted by: amdfanboy
inline style


<a href="#" ><img src="pic.jpg" style="border:none;" > </a>

Is there any benefit to using the style tag rather than the simple border="0"?

 

[AFB]

Originally posted by: MrCodeDude
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>amdfanboy</b></i>
inline style


<a href="#" ><img src="pic.jpg" style="border:none;" > </a><hr></blockquote>Is there any benefit to using the style tag rather than the simple border="0"?

Well, it is CSS, so it must be better 🙂😉. Anyway, I would recomend not doing that because it won't be parsed by browsers that can't do CSS