• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Quick CRT opinion..

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ramses

Platinum Member
Either one jump out as a better deal?

Sony/Dell Ultrascan p1110

or

Sun/Sony GDM-5410 oem SUN X7136A

There both under $100 and suposidly in fine shape used.
I lean toward the SUN since it's not blah beige..


Closing necro thread.
-- stahlhart
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They're both pretty much the same monitor with a different badge.
I'd go for sun anyways, since their brand is more prestigious.

I'd personally go for a newer one though. These monitors have a few convergence issues and are very very blurry with the brightness turned past only 15. So basically, to get a sharp image, you're going to have to be using 15brightness/80contrast.
 
I used one of those Sun 5410s at work a few months ago and it was terrible; the focus, black levels and power regulation were simply atrocious. It could have just been a particularly bad unit though.
 
Originally posted by: CP5670
I used one of those Sun 5410s at work a few months ago and it was terrible; the focus, black levels and power regulation were simply atrocious. It could have just been a particularly bad unit though.

It's common with refurbs..
I've used two refurb P1110 and it was the same story. Returned both of those and got a new one. You get what you pay for.
 
Interisting Sun/Sony/Dell would put out $1000 monitors that were that bad.
I'm going to go take a look at the Sun I think.

Is it going to look worse than my best buy 19" Mag I bought a couple years ago?

 
Originally posted by: Ramses
Interisting Sun/Sony/Dell would put out $1000 monitors that were that bad.
I'm going to go take a look at the Sun I think.

Is it going to look worse than my best buy 19" Mag I bought a couple years ago?

It's not bad. You basically get to choose dim or blurry. If you dim it down, then everything is razor sharp.
 
Well I got the Sun.
It's cosmeticaly near new, no screen blemishes. Prod date is 2000, I wish everything I had that was 6 years old looked this good.

After the first ten minutes the screen looks good.
It's got the horiz lines I've read about on trinatrons, but there not really bad.
For $90 I'm pretty content if it lasts a year. Text seems sharp enough, I'm running 1600x1200@100hz, will play with it more later.
 
Originally posted by: Ramses
Well I got the Sun.
It's cosmeticaly near new, no screen blemishes. Prod date is 2000, I wish everything I had that was 6 years old looked this good.

After the first ten minutes the screen looks good.
It's got the horiz lines I've read about on trinatrons, but there not really bad.
For $90 I'm pretty content if it lasts a year. Text seems sharp enough, I'm running 1600x1200@100hz, will play with it more later.

Lower the refresh rate to 85Hz max, if not 75Hz, and everything will be A LOT sharper.
100Hz will make every A LOT blurrier.
 
I have the Sun cable adaptor, is there any advantage in using that over the regular analog PC vid cable?
 
Found this thread when I was looking for something else. I ran that huge hot heavy ass $90 sun for six wonderful years till it finally started blanking out now and again for no good reason. Bought my first cheapo Acer 23" 1080P LED LCD to replace it a couple years ago now and it's been OK, I got used to the widescreen but it's still not my preference.
That was $90 damn well spent, I wish I'd bought a half dozen when they were so cheap and common. Next week is 27" IPS most likely, but I still miss that big flat square Sun.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top