So after spending time with my Venice 3000+ E3 (Stock Retail cooling) and MSI Neo2 Plat (Newegg Refurb) this is what I got:
1) HTT can go up to 335-340MHz when memory is at 100 8-4-4-3 and multiplier 5
2) CPU can go up to 9x288FSB = 2592MHz under Prime95 for about 5 min (no problems with Folding @ Home up to about 9x300
3) Here's the decision part - I have 4 sticks of 512MB Kingston HyperX 3200 that can do 5-2-3-2 up to about 210MHz and 4 sticks of 512MB Kingston HyperX 4000 that is supposed to do 250MHz at 8-4-4-3.
The system boots fine on 1.55V 9x288MHz with stock memory (I set the memory to 133MHz so it comes out to 0.666 x 288 which is like 185MHz). It runs Folding @ Home fine at this speed but fails Prime95 almost instantly. I'm testing Prime95 right now at 280MHz and it's stable for 20 minutes. CPU temps hitting about 50C on stock AMD HSF.
Question is how much of a performance hit am I going to be taking by running 2T (I need the 2GB of memory since Newsbin is going 24/7 and I often have 5-10 windows running). If it's not that much I'll just keep 4 of the HyperX sticks and sell the extra. If it is a big drop going to 2T - I'll be selling 8 sticks of HyperX
I don't game too often (maybe a game of CS and C&C Zero Hour every now and then - I'm still stuck on a Ti 4600). Is it better on most systems to have more bandwidth or lower latencies. Newsbin seems to really lag sometimes and it really eats up my memory - don't know if bandwidth or access time is better.
I was thinking of dropping the multiplier to 8, jumping the FSB to 315 (since 280MHz is stable under Prime95 at 20 minutes so [9x280]/8 = 315 and the HTT max was 335 or so in the first stage of testing, and then keeping the memory 133MHz so it effectively run 210MHz (a speed at which I could run CAS 2 5-3-2 using the 4 HyperX 3200s).
Any suggestions?