- Dec 10, 2000
- 431
- 0
- 0
I?m managing a computer used by maybe 20-30 students running XP Pro, which only has a 10GB hard drive. Needless to say, it?s almost completely filled up (less than 150MB left, and that was after I went through and deleted some junk).
I could enable quotas, but for the most part I really don?t think the students are doing anything ridiculous as far as wasting disk space. My other two options would seem to be either running the ?Disk Cleanup? app and allowing it to ?Compress Old Files?, which it claims would free up close to 3GB. Or I could enable disk compression for the drive.
Does anyone have any experience with either method? Where does the ?Disk Cleanup? app stick the compressed files-I mean are they liked Zipped up and stuck in the original location? Or is it using the same kind of disk compression that the other settings uses?
I?ve NEVER used disk compression before (and never would, on a personal computer), because I?ve always heard horror stories about stuff getting corrupted, but that was years ago, and XP/NTFS might do the job fine. Also, this system is (not surprisingly) pretty old. It?s like a 650MHz P3, Katmai core (or however you spell that), so it doesn?t have a bunch of spare CPU cycles to devote to compression.
Any thoughts? I?m about ready to ?throw the switch? and see what happens if I enable disk compression on the whole drive. Could I use ?Enable Disk Compression? in conjunction with ?Compress Old Files?, or would that be doing basically the same thing (or maybe they?re EXACTLY the same setting-I have no idea).
I could enable quotas, but for the most part I really don?t think the students are doing anything ridiculous as far as wasting disk space. My other two options would seem to be either running the ?Disk Cleanup? app and allowing it to ?Compress Old Files?, which it claims would free up close to 3GB. Or I could enable disk compression for the drive.
Does anyone have any experience with either method? Where does the ?Disk Cleanup? app stick the compressed files-I mean are they liked Zipped up and stuck in the original location? Or is it using the same kind of disk compression that the other settings uses?
I?ve NEVER used disk compression before (and never would, on a personal computer), because I?ve always heard horror stories about stuff getting corrupted, but that was years ago, and XP/NTFS might do the job fine. Also, this system is (not surprisingly) pretty old. It?s like a 650MHz P3, Katmai core (or however you spell that), so it doesn?t have a bunch of spare CPU cycles to devote to compression.
Any thoughts? I?m about ready to ?throw the switch? and see what happens if I enable disk compression on the whole drive. Could I use ?Enable Disk Compression? in conjunction with ?Compress Old Files?, or would that be doing basically the same thing (or maybe they?re EXACTLY the same setting-I have no idea).