Originally posted by: Number1
I was in the army for a few years. We were NOT allowed to bring in our own fire arms. I would imagine it's the same rule for law enforcement.
Originally posted by: Gooberlx2
Originally posted by: Number1
I was in the army for a few years. We were NOT allowed to bring in our own fire arms. I would imagine it's the same rule for law enforcement.
I thought there was a big grey area with that. I remember reading an article some time ago (time or newsweek, or one of those types of magazines) about US troops in Afghanistan not liking the stopping power of the standard issue sidearms, so they were semi-smuggling in their own .45s and .50s, and it was all kinda being "ignored".
Not so?
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Military: You're in BFN shooting time and time again. Supplying you is going to be difficult.
Police: You probably have two weeks to reload after a gun fight. Pleanty of time to find a local gun shop.
Military: They are required to have FMJ by international treaties.
Police: You don't want to go THOUGH your target, just into them.
Military: Going through walls isn't too much of a concern.
Police: Going through walls IS a major concern (in a bad way).
Military needs and police needs don't really mirror eachother very much when it comes to weapons. I haven't seen the US army issuing many bean-bag shotguns out to the troops![]()
If you're in a combat unit, God forbid you ever need to use your sidearm. Actually, the US might be the only country that issues sidearms to all soldiers across the board.Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Military: You're in BFN shooting time and time again. Supplying you is going to be difficult.
Police: You probably have two weeks to reload after a gun fight. Pleanty of time to find a local gun shop.
Military: They are required to have FMJ by international treaties.
Police: You don't want to go THOUGH your target, just into them.
Military: Going through walls isn't too much of a concern.
Police: Going through walls IS a major concern (in a bad way).
Military needs and police needs don't really mirror eachother very much when it comes to weapons. I haven't seen the US army issuing many bean-bag shotguns out to the troops![]()
thats kinda funny that the military has to use FMJ due to treaties but civilians are allowed and encouraged to use hollow-points
Originally posted by: Meuge
If you're in a combat unit, God forbid you ever need to use your sidearm. Actually, the US might be the only country that issues sidearms to all soldiers across the board.Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Military: You're in BFN shooting time and time again. Supplying you is going to be difficult.
Police: You probably have two weeks to reload after a gun fight. Pleanty of time to find a local gun shop.
Military: They are required to have FMJ by international treaties.
Police: You don't want to go THOUGH your target, just into them.
Military: Going through walls isn't too much of a concern.
Police: Going through walls IS a major concern (in a bad way).
Military needs and police needs don't really mirror eachother very much when it comes to weapons. I haven't seen the US army issuing many bean-bag shotguns out to the troops![]()
thats kinda funny that the military has to use FMJ due to treaties but civilians are allowed and encouraged to use hollow-points
The sidearm is there for backup only... and when it comes to the battlefield, 16 rounds/clip is much better than 12.
