Question for fellow EEs: negative resistance

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

JohnCU

Banned
Dec 9, 2000
16,528
4
0
Okay, #3 works now

Click on the one in my thread, not the quoted one, I changed the scale around.
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
BTW, what are you using to log the data and make the graphs?

It would be cool to graph out the temperature characteristics vs. power consumption of the huge peltier-cooled cooler I'm building.. lol
 

tikwanleap

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
922
0
0
On graph #3:

Now it looks like the resistance is more like a linear constant again.

Except after it is exposed to higher voltages it has a higher resistance by the time it returns to 300. (I'm assuming the path goes from top to bottom instead of bottom to top.)

It seems there is confusion in the term "negative resistance" here. We're really talking about a change in the value of the resistance. In ideal resistors, it should be constant and unchanging, but we are seeing the resistance change at high voltages.... This latest graph seems to confirm that the changes are being caused by heat and changes in the physical structure/properties of the graphite.
 

JohnCU

Banned
Dec 9, 2000
16,528
4
0
Originally posted by: Eli
BTW, what are you using to log the data and make the graphs?

It would be cool to graph out the temperature characteristics vs. power consumption of the huge peltier-cooled cooler I'm building.. lol

They gave me a program called Test Point. It's like Visual Basic for digital sourcemeters. I program the machine through a serial cable, tell it what I want, it takes the readings and sends them back to me and I auto export them to Excel. It's neat, but the sourcemeter costs $5,000, so I can't have one at home. :(
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Originally posted by: JohnCU
Originally posted by: Eli
BTW, what are you using to log the data and make the graphs?

It would be cool to graph out the temperature characteristics vs. power consumption of the huge peltier-cooled cooler I'm building.. lol

They gave me a program called Test Point. It's like Visual Basic for digital sourcemeters. I program the machine through a serial cable, tell it what I want, it takes the readings and sends them back to me and I auto export them to Excel. It's neat, but the sourcemeter costs $5,000, so I can't have one at home. :(
Ouch.

I need to win the fscking lottery. lol
 

JohnCU

Banned
Dec 9, 2000
16,528
4
0
Originally posted by: tikwanleap
On graph #3:

Now it looks like the resistance is more like a linear constant again.

Except after it is exposed to higher voltages it has a higher resistance by the time it returns to 300. (I'm assuming the path goes from top to bottom instead of bottom to top.)

It seems there is confusion in the term "negative resistance" here. We're really talking about a change in the value of the resistance. In ideal resistors, it should be constant and unchanging, but we are seeing the resistance change at high voltages.... This latest graph seems to confirm that the changes are being caused by heat and changes in the physical structure/properties of the graphite.

You are correct, it goes from top to bottom. I included the data points to show that.
 

JohnCU

Banned
Dec 9, 2000
16,528
4
0
Originally posted by: Eli
ouch.

I need to win the fscking lottery. lol

yeah seriously man, but maybe you can pick up a cheap one on ebay or something that is not as nice but still allows you to program it and retrieve data. The manufacturer is Keithley.
 

tikwanleap

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
922
0
0
Ah, just skimming through that link about negative resistance.

There are two types of resistance:

Static resistance... It's the R in V=IR or R=V/I

Dynamic resistance... r= dV/dI = (change in V)/(change in I)

The dynamic resistance or change in resistance is what they're talking about when they say negative resistance. It's really negative "dynamic" resistance or negative change in resistance.

The static resistance is always positive...
 

JohnCU

Banned
Dec 9, 2000
16,528
4
0
The change in resistance is not negative. The slope (derivative) of the line is the resistance, and the slope is negative, so the resistance appears to be negative, but if you take the Voltage at any point on that line, and the current at that point, and divide them, the resistance is positive.

If the graph looks like /, the slope is constant and the graph of the derivative looks like -------. Likewise, \ derivative graph looks like negative ------------ The resistance isn't changing just because the slope is negative. It's constant and appears negative.

Considering i as a function of v.
i(v) = v/R

derivative of i with respect to v is 1/R, or C.
 

mercanucaribe

Banned
Oct 20, 2004
9,763
1
0
I don't know how you calculate resistance, etc, but on the graph the line is labelled as "detector resistance' which never becomes positive anyway. If that is correct, isn't slope of the line just change in resistance, meaning that the resistance of the graphite/clay goes down at about 300v and then stays at some low point at 400v?
 

JohnCU

Banned
Dec 9, 2000
16,528
4
0
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
I don't know how you calculate resistance, etc, but on the graph the line is labelled as "detector resistance' which never becomes positive anyway. If that is correct, isn't slope of the line just change in resistance, meaning that the resistance of the graphite/clay goes down at about 300v and then stays at some low point at 400v?

No, that line is wrong and I forgot to delete it, it's for something else. ;) The slope of the line IS resistance, or conductance in this case, the reciprocal of resistance.. y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. i=v/R, where the slope is 1/R, or C.
 

JohnCU

Banned
Dec 9, 2000
16,528
4
0
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Why didn't you just say that the change in resistance was negative in the first place? Did you fail calculus??

Nope, I passed Calculus 1, 2, and 3 with A's and a B in Calc 4. Maybe you failed it, since you think dV/dI is the change in resistance. ;)
 

tikwanleap

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
922
0
0
Originally posted by: JohnCU
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Why didn't you just say that the change in resistance was negative in the first place? Did you fail calculus??

Nope, I passed Calculus 1, 2, and 3 with A's and a B in Calc 4. Maybe you failed it, since you think dV/dI is the change in resistance. ;)

I must have failed it, because I thought dV/dI is the change in resistance too.
 

JohnCU

Banned
Dec 9, 2000
16,528
4
0
Originally posted by: tikwanleap
Originally posted by: JohnCU
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Why didn't you just say that the change in resistance was negative in the first place? Did you fail calculus??

Nope, I passed Calculus 1, 2, and 3 with A's and a B in Calc 4. Maybe you failed it, since you think dV/dI is the change in resistance. ;)

I must have failed it, because I thought dV/dI is the change in resistance too.

No, dV/dI is the slope of the line, which is resistance. The change in resistance is the second derivative.
 

tikwanleap

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
922
0
0
Originally posted by: tikwanleap
Originally posted by: JohnCU
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Why didn't you just say that the change in resistance was negative in the first place? Did you fail calculus??

Nope, I passed Calculus 1, 2, and 3 with A's and a B in Calc 4. Maybe you failed it, since you think dV/dI is the change in resistance. ;)

I must have failed it, because I thought dV/dI is the change in resistance too.

Oh ok, I was confusing myself....


For a V = IR graph... R is the slope if I is on the x axis.... ok so dV/dI is the instantaneous slope or instantaneous resistance at that point in the graph.... ok my brain hurts now...doh :confused:
 

tikwanleap

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
922
0
0
Originally posted by: JohnCU
Originally posted by: tikwanleap
Originally posted by: JohnCU
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Why didn't you just say that the change in resistance was negative in the first place? Did you fail calculus??

Nope, I passed Calculus 1, 2, and 3 with A's and a B in Calc 4. Maybe you failed it, since you think dV/dI is the change in resistance. ;)

I must have failed it, because I thought dV/dI is the change in resistance too.

No, dV/dI is the slope of the line, which is resistance. The change in resistance is the second derivative.

Yep, you're right.
 

JohnCU

Banned
Dec 9, 2000
16,528
4
0
yeah, it's confusing because the graph really shows conductance, since i'm sourcing voltage, making the current the dependent variable. I think it's easier for us to source voltage and measure current than the other way around, not sure.
 

tikwanleap

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
922
0
0
Originally posted by: JohnCU
yeah, it's confusing because the graph really shows conductance, since i'm sourcing voltage, making the current the dependent variable. I think it's easier for us to source voltage and measure current than the other way around, not sure.

yeah, it's easier to build a constant voltage source than a constant current source.
 

tikwanleap

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
922
0
0
Originally posted by: tikwanleap
Originally posted by: JohnCU
yeah, it's confusing because the graph really shows conductance, since i'm sourcing voltage, making the current the dependent variable. I think it's easier for us to source voltage and measure current than the other way around, not sure.

yeah, it's easier to build a constant voltage source than a constant current source.

I love it when I kill threads... dar dar dar.
 

JohnCU

Banned
Dec 9, 2000
16,528
4
0
Originally posted by: tikwanleap
Originally posted by: tikwanleap
Originally posted by: JohnCU
yeah, it's confusing because the graph really shows conductance, since i'm sourcing voltage, making the current the dependent variable. I think it's easier for us to source voltage and measure current than the other way around, not sure.

yeah, it's easier to build a constant voltage source than a constant current source.

I love it when I kill threads... dar dar dar.

need more electrical geeks in here. ;)
 

JohnCU

Banned
Dec 9, 2000
16,528
4
0
Originally posted by: cressida
Originally posted by: JohnCU
electricity rocks, someone needs to start a friday night EE thread.

I nominate you, the cocky EE guy

I'm not cocky, I only have a 3.4 GPA in EE :( but I'm stubborn and think I'm right and in this thread, for once, I was ;) usually I get owned by ATOT.