question about performance

[twitchee2]

will there be a noticeable difference between the 2? i will be video edting and gaming. ultra-d NO OVERCLOCKING

 

[twitchee2]

no one?

 

[GuitarDaddy]

SD will be 3-10% faster, in video encoding closer to 10%.

Just out of curiousity if doing NO OVERCLOCKING why did you buy an Ultra-D?

 

[twitchee2]

stable board and i might OC in a year or so when my parts start showing their age

 

[qbackin]

Originally posted by: GuitarDaddy
SD will be 3-10% faster, in video encoding closer to 10%.

Just out of curiousity if doing NO OVERCLOCKING why did you buy an Ultra-D?

Roger that. Just wait, you will have the need for speed

 

[twitchee2]

Originally posted by: qbackin

Originally posted by: GuitarDaddy
SD will be 3-10% faster, in video encoding closer to 10%.

Just out of curiousity if doing NO OVERCLOCKING why did you buy an Ultra-D?

Roger that. Just wait, you will have the need for speed

haha probly and watch pnce i get it running ill porbly end up treaking

 

[theMan]

Originally posted by: twitchee2

Originally posted by: qbackin

Originally posted by: GuitarDaddy
SD will be 3-10% faster, in video encoding closer to 10%.

Just out of curiousity if doing NO OVERCLOCKING why did you buy an Ultra-D?

Roger that. Just wait, you will have the need for speed

haha probly and watch pnce i get it running ill porbly end up treaking

thats exactly what happened to me...

but, if you can pay for it, the 3700 is definately what you want. just make sure it doesnt force you to decrease your video card. thats #1 in importance.

 

[twitchee2]

well right now im at 1500 for everything but monitor and im keeping my current monitor for now. i only need 200 bucks till ihave everything saved up so that will be in like couple of weeks

 

[twitchee2]

ok so i should get the 3700 is i can afford it