Originally posted by: larry89
Yes it would, but you would be running at a 2T command rate which results in loss of memory bandwidth but the real world difference is unoticable, But your memory would also be running at ddr333.
Originally posted by: prankster
So I shouldn't combine my 2x256mb pc3200 with 2x512mb pc3200?
you have a revision E cpu then. the memory controllers in the older cpu's dont support that. and if you have it set in the bios without a new cpu, it probably isnt being implemented. check cpu-z.Originally posted by: RadiclDreamer
I run DDR400 with 4 sticks. You just have to manually select it in the bios.
Originally posted by: theman
you have a revision E cpu then. the memory controllers in the older cpu's dont support that. and if you have it set in the bios without a new cpu, it probably isnt being implemented. check cpu-z.Originally posted by: RadiclDreamer
I run DDR400 with 4 sticks. You just have to manually select it in the bios.
i dont think it will be that bad, but if you are really into conserving every bit of power your computer has, it will just sell the other sticks. otherwise, dont worry.
Originally posted by: RadiclDreamer
I run DDR400 with 4 sticks. You just have to manually select it in the bios
Originally posted by: So
Out of curiosity, would this apply to three sticks on a newcastle core? I have two sticks of 512 ATM and I'd like to go to 2 gigs, but I'd rather not scrap my existing ram...it's a s754, so I don't have dual channel issues to worry about anyway.
Originally posted by: prankster
Okay, I ran CPU-Z and it's telling me that my memory runs at pc3200 (200MHz) on slot#1. And the same thing on slot#2. Aren't they supposed to run at 400MHz?