- Sep 19, 2001
- 4,711
- 2
- 76
So do they really make a difference as to 5 more fps to justify the price difference? Unless you just wanna be the first and the uber geek to get the best stuff, then why would you shell out money for a not-so-significant increase in performance? (I'm assuming this is the casual gamer and by performance I mean increase in fps) I've been outta the video card scene for 2-3 years now, but from what I'm understanding, a TI4200 128MB is about equivalent to a ATI 9600 128MB, with just a slight diff in performance. Current prices on the cards are $101 (4200) and $140 (9600). I'm also assuming that both these cards will play CS2 or Doom3 fine (1280x1024 32bit)? So for the casual gamer who wants the best deal, is the 4200 or the 9600 the better bang for the performance?