• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Quest to find the smartest person on AnandTech.

Dofuss3000

Golden Member
My quest is to find the smartest person on AnandTech. Since there is over 143,000 registered members on the board (and at least 12 to 15% of which are repeats) I expect the smartest person on these forums to have an IQ of about 165, SD of 15. But since this is a high-end internet forum, it may be as high as 166 to 171, SD of 15. To show that you are the smartest person on AnandTech, send me a score report on any viable IQ test (like the WAIS, SB, etc.) or standardized aptitude test (like the SAT or GRE). I will bump this thread once a day (missing a couple due to other obligations) for the next month. At that time I will announce who the smartest person is. If a higher score comes in, then the highest scorer and the previous highest scorer will be listed, in order of highest intelligence. If you think a friend is very intelligent and is a member of this board, tell them about this thread and send them a link. That is all for now, good luck!
 
Standarized tests like IQ or ACT/SAT don't prove jack shizzle. I sucked at all 3, yet somehow I graduated with a 3.92 in my mba and am a level3 cfa candidate.
 
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Standarized tests like IQ or ACT/SAT don't prove jack shizzle. I sucked at all 3, yet somehow I graduated with a 3.92 in my mba and am a level3 cfa candidate.

The new SAT has a very low correlation with IQ tests, but the previous two versions had high correlations. There is a .5 correlation between IQ and grades, so don't think good grades automatically proves that you have a high IQ too.
 
please notify us when you find the smartest member here so the rest of us can beat him up and take his lunch money.
 
Originally posted by: Kalmah
Originally posted by: KK
Originally posted by: Kalmah
Originally posted by: KK
Originally posted by: Dofuss3000
Originally posted by: KK
look no further

Do you have an IQ or aptitude test to prove it?

Ask me a question.

What is your favorite color!???

Elephant

African or European elephants?

They have more than one type of elephant? hmm...interesting...
 
Originally posted by: Dofuss3000
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Standarized tests like IQ or ACT/SAT don't prove jack shizzle. I sucked at all 3, yet somehow I graduated with a 3.92 in my mba and am a level3 cfa candidate.

The new SAT has a very low correlation with IQ tests, but the previous two versions had high correlations. There is a .5 correlation between IQ and grades, so don't think good grades automatically proves that you have a high IQ too.

A .5 correlation with something is a pretty high correlation. Now, if the correlation was .1, then I'd say it was "very low". Statistically speaking, saying something is correlated with another on a magnatude of .5, is pretty high.

Sure, good grades doesn't prove you have a high IQ. However, good grades in a graudate level education, competing with other graduate level students in a good school probably shows you are higher intelligence than most.

If we were talking high-school gpa, that'd be something else. If we were talking underwater basket weaving, again, something else.
 
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: Dofuss3000
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Standarized tests like IQ or ACT/SAT don't prove jack shizzle. I sucked at all 3, yet somehow I graduated with a 3.92 in my mba and am a level3 cfa candidate.

The new SAT has a very low correlation with IQ tests, but the previous two versions had high correlations. There is a .5 correlation between IQ and grades, so don't think good grades automatically proves that you have a high IQ too.

A .5 correlation with something is a pretty high correlation. Now, if the correlation was .1, then I'd say it was "very low". Statistically speaking, saying something is correlated with another on a magnatude of .5, is pretty high.

Sure, good grades doesn't prove you have a high IQ. However, good grades in a graudate level education, competing with other graduate level students in a good school probably shows you are higher intelligence than most.

If we were talking high-school gpa, that'd be something else. If we were talking underwater basket weaving, again, something else.

A .5 correlation is moderately high, but definitely not "very high." The average IQ of someone with a Ph.D. is between 128 and 131, SD 15... in the world of high intelligence, that is below average. The average IQ obtained on high-range IQ tests (ones that measure up to and above 4 standard deviations) is about 142 to 144, SD 15.
 
Originally posted by: Dofuss3000
I expect the smartest person on these forums to have an IQ of about 165, SD of 15. But since this is a high-end internet forum, it may be as high as 166 to 171, SD of 15.

Shut the fvck up with your standard deviation you pretentious prick. Talk about unnecessary wordy bullsh1t. "I expect [...] about [...]" would have been sufficient. No one thinks you deserve a spot in the running. I'm like... fvcking borderline retarded and I understand SD. Do you raise your hand in class, answer a question, and then give the prof a random SD value based on how accurate you think your answer is? I fvcking hate pretentious pseudo-intellects.

God damnit... my tequila buzz is completely gone. I fvcking hate coming down from a buzz while I'm still awake.

Also, your thread sucks. I predict 99% bullsh1t, with an SD of +/-1%.
 
Back
Top