Bobthelost
Diamond Member
- Dec 1, 2005
- 4,360
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
what benchmarks were ignored?Originally posted by: Bobthelost
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
Originally posted by: Bobthelost
The 7900GT wins in terms of fps, but then it is lambasted for image quality that should be seperated into another section according to the author.
Too much subjective commentry to be a good review imo. The summaries attempt to be definitive but makes an utter hash of it. I think that the summary has been rewritten somewhat since i first read it.
lol.. let me guess.. you own an nvidia product?
Yep, the high end ATI cards suck in too much power to be cooled silently. Thus my descision was made for me. However if you're going to go to all the trouble of doing benchmarks and then decide to ignore them completely when it comes to writing the summary it's a bit stupid don't you think?
your comment about 7900GT winning is wrong on so many levels i really didn't feel the necessity to get into it with you.
ignoring the whole iq/features issues, while i could agree with your comments about passive cooling, that kind of throws your whole overclocking/performance thing right out the window, doesn't it? kinda makes your entire point.... entirely irrelevant. :shocked:
So it's my imagination that my 7800GT is overclocked and drawing roughly the same amount of power with an aftermarket AC NV 5 and yet is nearly inaudible