• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Discussion Qualcomm Snapdragon Thread

Page 93 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Freedom at last.
But maybe Tim C. lashes of pain were dished out to hweng slaves for a reason.

See that 3.4G power being what it is?
That's very no bueno for phone form-factors.
Even with N3e this looks kinda stinky for phone applications.
Lol for once we agree. This is why I think something’s up I guess. N3E won’t give them enough to straight port this and be fine. Oryon is a Firestorm clone but something in power delivery or phydes keeps it from being as good as it should be imo.
Plus they need a real 1t bump and given that Oryon/Phoenix isn't much higher IPC than Cortex-X4. Well.
Yep.
 
Lol for once we agree. This is why I think something’s up I guess. N3E won’t give them enough to straight port this and be fine. Oryon is a Firestorm clone but something in power delivery or phydes keeps it from being as good as it should be imo.
8cx Gen 3 had good power consumption.

So there's a regression here...
 
8cx Gen 3 had good power consumption.

So there's a regression here...
Yeah they traded power for perf in a really weird way.
Mind that 8cx g3 was like 5LPE, suboptimal node for laptop applications.
I think people are being a bit too negative again.
It's a solid starting point for future iterations. Real world battery life (i.e. not Cinebenchod) and web browser performance look good. Not revolutionary and that's OK.

GPU
QC promised the epick market-breaker and it's just a meh part.
Competetive enough, kinda, something you rush to change ISA for? naaa.
 
Back
Top