Q6600 on Abit IP35-E

Gillbot

Lifer
Jan 11, 2001
28,830
17
81
They can OC well but the board wasn't really designed to handle the power demand of a quad, let alone a heavily OC'ed quad.
 
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
This has not been proven, there are alternate opinions that say bios 16b2+ (17 for sure at least) fix this. I, for one, experienced massive vdroop after 1.5075v on my E2180. Vdroop loaded with bios set to 1.5075v was 1.472-1.48 in CPU-z. Then I put it at 1.52 and loaded vdroop was 1.45 without cranking the frequency any. I put it all the way up to 1.56v in BIOS and still was at 1.45 loaded. Something was definitely going on. Now after upgrading the bios, going to 1.54v goes to ~1.5v loaded in CPU-z. So I can verify that another poster's report that there were changes in voltage handling in bios 16b2+, because there was definitely a change for me.
 

demiurge3141

Member
Nov 13, 2007
183
0
0
You will see vdrop+vdroop of about 0.1, and you better put a fan over the mosfets, but other than that it does surprisingly well.
 

Gillbot

Lifer
Jan 11, 2001
28,830
17
81
Originally posted by: soccerballtux
This has not been proven, there are alternate opinions that say bios 16b2+ (17 for sure at least) fix this. I, for one, experienced massive vdroop after 1.5075v on my E2180. Vdroop loaded with bios set to 1.5075v was 1.472-1.48 in CPU-z. Then I put it at 1.52 and loaded vdroop was 1.45 without cranking the frequency any. I put it all the way up to 1.56v in BIOS and still was at 1.45 loaded. Something was definitely going on. Now after upgrading the bios, going to 1.54v goes to ~1.5v loaded in CPU-z. So I can verify that another poster's report that there were changes in voltage handling in bios 16b2+, because there was definitely a change for me.

Tell that to the many who have a dead IP35-E after upgrading to a quad.
 

bryanW1995

Lifer
May 22, 2007
11,144
32
91
I read a lot of anecdotal evidence in support of gillbot's claim before purchasing....an ip35e to go with my q6600. however, I rolled the dice and have been satisfied thus far. I have them running at 3.4 with nary a hiccup, though I do have a tuniq on the q6600 at least.
 

SolMiester

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2004
5,330
17
76
I have the Q6600 @ 3ghz on my Abit IP35 (STD version).....I have a high VID of 1.325 so havent gone for the ceiling yet, no real need too.
 

Gillbot

Lifer
Jan 11, 2001
28,830
17
81
Originally posted by: soccerballtux
Links?

I know of three personally, no links to give. Plus a few other people I know online are having issues with their IP35-E's after a bit of run time. It seems that over time, the boards seem to degrade and the OC starts to fall till the point that the mobo is unstable even at default settings. Only a new mobo solved the problems.
 

Ratman6161

Senior member
Mar 21, 2008
616
75
91
Perhaps I just got lucky? But after about 6 months I'm having no problems at all. I was able to get to 3.0 GHz without increasing any voltages. Currently, at 3.2Ghz I turned up the cpu voltage just one notch above the bottom and it works fine and runs cool (with a tuniq tower 120). Just for grins I tried 3.6 Ghz and could do it, but really had to crank up the voltage to get there. I don't remember what I had to use but do remember that it was more than I was comfortable with.

Anyway, for stock up to a moderate overclock, it seems to work great and has been very reliable.

EDIT: PS: I often wonder if the people having problems are actually having problems for other reasons such as inadequate power supply, etc? Not sure since mine works fine.
 

Gillbot

Lifer
Jan 11, 2001
28,830
17
81
Originally posted by: Ratman6161
Perhaps I just got lucky? But after about 6 months I'm having no problems at all. I was able to get to 3.0 GHz without increasing any voltages. Currently, at 3.2Ghz I turned up the cpu voltage just one notch above the bottom and it works fine and runs cool (with a tuniq tower 120). Just for grins I tried 3.6 Ghz and could do it, but really had to crank up the voltage to get there. I don't remember what I had to use but do remember that it was more than I was comfortable with.

Anyway, for stock up to a moderate overclock, it seems to work great and has been very reliable.

EDIT: PS: I often wonder if the people having problems are actually having problems for other reasons such as inadequate power supply, etc? Not sure since mine works fine.

There's the reason, mild OC's are usually fine but when you really put a heavy load or OC on, that's when the thing starts to droop.
 

demiurge3141

Member
Nov 13, 2007
183
0
0
Originally posted by: Gillbot
Originally posted by: Ratman6161
Perhaps I just got lucky? But after about 6 months I'm having no problems at all. I was able to get to 3.0 GHz without increasing any voltages. Currently, at 3.2Ghz I turned up the cpu voltage just one notch above the bottom and it works fine and runs cool (with a tuniq tower 120). Just for grins I tried 3.6 Ghz and could do it, but really had to crank up the voltage to get there. I don't remember what I had to use but do remember that it was more than I was comfortable with.

Anyway, for stock up to a moderate overclock, it seems to work great and has been very reliable.

EDIT: PS: I often wonder if the people having problems are actually having problems for other reasons such as inadequate power supply, etc? Not sure since mine works fine.

There's the reason, mild OC's are usually fine but when you really put a heavy load or OC on, that's when the thing starts to droop.

should really actively cool mosfet area, gets very very hot.
 

SolMiester

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2004
5,330
17
76
I may have an advantage as I have a wind tunnel blowing air from front to back thru HSF and also blowing over RAM and mosfet area.....
 

Gillbot

Lifer
Jan 11, 2001
28,830
17
81
Originally posted by: demiurge3141
Originally posted by: Gillbot
Originally posted by: Ratman6161
Perhaps I just got lucky? But after about 6 months I'm having no problems at all. I was able to get to 3.0 GHz without increasing any voltages. Currently, at 3.2Ghz I turned up the cpu voltage just one notch above the bottom and it works fine and runs cool (with a tuniq tower 120). Just for grins I tried 3.6 Ghz and could do it, but really had to crank up the voltage to get there. I don't remember what I had to use but do remember that it was more than I was comfortable with.

Anyway, for stock up to a moderate overclock, it seems to work great and has been very reliable.

EDIT: PS: I often wonder if the people having problems are actually having problems for other reasons such as inadequate power supply, etc? Not sure since mine works fine.

There's the reason, mild OC's are usually fine but when you really put a heavy load or OC on, that's when the thing starts to droop.

should really actively cool mosfet area, gets very very hot.

That could be the source of failure, none of the people I know had ANY active cooling on their boards. They were all stock.
 

21stHermit

Senior member
Dec 16, 2003
927
1
81
Originally posted by: demiurge3141
should really actively cool mosfet area, gets very very hot.
Just what/where is the MOSFET area? I have the IP35-E and think its the most stable MB I've had in years.

 

Diogenes2

Platinum Member
Jul 26, 2001
2,151
0
0
I have the IP35-e with a Q6600 - 3.2g @ 1.4v - been running fine for over six months - it's my sons gaming machine and it really takes a beating..

Never knew this board had problems till I saw this thread ..
 

Tweakin

Platinum Member
Feb 7, 2000
2,532
0
71
I was one of the many who ditched my Q6600 as I could not get anything stable above 3.1Ghz on this board. When I maxed the memory to 8GB, the clock dropped down to 3Ghz windozs bootable, but not really stable.

Mild OC's with 4GB memory and the board is fine. If you are ok with a max OC of 3.2Ghz, then you shouldn't see a problem.

I just felt that the system overall responded slower then my e6750 @ 3.5Ghz, which is where I have been for several months and back down to 4GB on Vista 32...nary a problem since then.

Hope that helps.