Originally posted by: AccruedExpenditure
a bad idea.
Originally posted by: AccruedExpenditure
a bad idea.
Originally posted by: KK
and how many knew they used sand for traction.
Originally posted by: compuwiz1
Done with diesel locomotives, but did ya know, those running diesel engines don't actually drive the wheels of the train? How many of you thought they did?
Originally posted by: Iron Woode
woo wooOriginally posted by: leftyman
chugga chugga
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
two stroke engines for the win!
in theory you can make 2x the power of a similar 4 stroke since 4 strokes only take in air every other cycle, where as 2 strokes do it every cycle.
what i think is crazy though is this......
you can actually get a "free" super/turbo charger effect if you can make your engine suck in air at a really high rate. F1 engines have roughly 120% volumetric efficiency.....that means an extra 20% of air is being forced into the engine, and this happens simply because the engine is sucking in huge amounts of air, and at a high rate.....the momentum of the air (1m^3 air = 1.2Kg) literally forces more air into the cylinder before the valves shut.
my lecturer said if you really try, you can get 140% volumetric efficiency....basically gives you a nice power boost for nothing
Originally posted by: amdskip
I knew this because my uncle is an engineer for UP in Texas.
Cracks me up that after all these years, they still call the fireman the fireman.Inside the cab there are two seats: one for the engineer and one for the fireman.
Originally posted by: sao123
Originally posted by: amdskip
I knew this because my uncle is an engineer for UP in Texas.
CSX + BO + Chessie + Conrail >>> Union Pacific + Santa Fe