• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Pull a 9500pro Insert 9600xt

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Higher clock speed increases heat. Heat = power.
Going to a small process decreases heat.
Using the low-k dielectric thingie decreases heat.
Using less transistors decreases heat.

So the 9500 Pro, with a full .15u 9700 core, is a power-hungry monster.
The 9600 Pro, with less than 2/3 the transistors (IIRC), on .13u process, uses much less heat.
The 9600 XT, using a low-k dielectric, uses even less power. Also, in the process, much like all these Athlon core revisions, they found where they were hitting walls in getting it to run at higher clock speeds, did a bit of redesigning, and got it to run faster.

If any of that is incorrect, I'm going from memory.

edit: Yeah, I meant .15
 
Back
Top