Psychopathology of George W. Bush.

[conjur]

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: Mill
Did you have a point, or just another troll thread by you?

How many books of psychoanalysis did you read?
Next to zero, I guess.
I read many. I am litterate, you see. If you were you would understand that both analysis are very intelligent.
I am very sorry for you.

Oh...really?

 

[Mill]

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: XZeroII
It's VERY unprofessional to try to diagnose someone without first sitting down with the person and talking with him. Otherwise, you could just call a shrink and they could tell you whats wrong and what to do right over the phone.

Anyone who actually believes any of this is not too bright.

Do you believe Bush is sane?
Do you believe noone should discuss the personality of the most powerful man on earth?

1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. Stop trolling.

Anyone who believes Bush is sane is neurotic. From your posts I also guess that you are kind of psycho-rigid.
I read hundreds of books of psychoanalysis. Sorry, I haven't compiled a list.

Name 10 then. I'm not asking for a list. If you've read hundreds then certainly you can come up wtih a few. Fvcking asshat troll.

Psycho-rigid, giving orders, vulgar. You suffer from sadistic-anal neurosis.

Answer the question. Stop throwing out Red Herrings.

 

[XZeroII]

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: XZeroII
It's VERY unprofessional to try to diagnose someone without first sitting down with the person and talking with him. Otherwise, you could just call a shrink and they could tell you whats wrong and what to do right over the phone.

Anyone who actually believes any of this is not too bright.

Do you believe Bush is sane?
Do you believe noone should discuss the personality of the most powerful man on earth?

1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. Stop trolling.

Anyone who believes Bush is sane is neurotic. From your posts I also guess that you are kind of psycho-rigid.
I read hundreds of books of psychoanalysis. Sorry, I haven't compiled a list.

Is that a diagnosis based on those books you read?

 

[Nietzscheusw]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: Mill
Did you have a point, or just another troll thread by you?

How many books of psychoanalysis did you read?
Next to zero, I guess.
I read many. I am litterate, you see. If you were you would understand that both analysis are very intelligent.
I am very sorry for you.

Oh...really?

I had a doubt when I typed a double t like in french.

 

[Mill]

Originally posted by: XZeroII

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: XZeroII
It's VERY unprofessional to try to diagnose someone without first sitting down with the person and talking with him. Otherwise, you could just call a shrink and they could tell you whats wrong and what to do right over the phone.

Anyone who actually believes any of this is not too bright.

Do you believe Bush is sane?
Do you believe noone should discuss the personality of the most powerful man on earth?

1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. Stop trolling.

Anyone who believes Bush is sane is neurotic. From your posts I also guess that you are kind of psycho-rigid.
I read hundreds of books of psychoanalysis. Sorry, I haven't compiled a list.

Is that a diagnosis based on those books you read?

Obviously we are all crazy and he is the only sane one. That is why he is posting troll material on a US message board and he is French. How shocking.

 

[Nietzscheusw]

Originally posted by: XZeroII

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: XZeroII
It's VERY unprofessional to try to diagnose someone without first sitting down with the person and talking with him. Otherwise, you could just call a shrink and they could tell you whats wrong and what to do right over the phone.

Anyone who actually believes any of this is not too bright.

Do you believe Bush is sane?
Do you believe noone should discuss the personality of the most powerful man on earth?

1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. Stop trolling.

Anyone who believes Bush is sane is neurotic. From your posts I also guess that you are kind of psycho-rigid.
I read hundreds of books of psychoanalysis. Sorry, I haven't compiled a list.

Is that a diagnosis based on those books you read?

Do you believe Bush is sane?

 

[Mill]

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: XZeroII

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: XZeroII
It's VERY unprofessional to try to diagnose someone without first sitting down with the person and talking with him. Otherwise, you could just call a shrink and they could tell you whats wrong and what to do right over the phone.

Anyone who actually believes any of this is not too bright.

Do you believe Bush is sane?
Do you believe noone should discuss the personality of the most powerful man on earth?

1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. Stop trolling.

Anyone who believes Bush is sane is neurotic. From your posts I also guess that you are kind of psycho-rigid.
I read hundreds of books of psychoanalysis. Sorry, I haven't compiled a list.

Is that a diagnosis based on those books you read?

Do you believe Bush is sane?

Circular argument.

 

[XZeroII]

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: XZeroII

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: XZeroII
It's VERY unprofessional to try to diagnose someone without first sitting down with the person and talking with him. Otherwise, you could just call a shrink and they could tell you whats wrong and what to do right over the phone.

Anyone who actually believes any of this is not too bright.

Do you believe Bush is sane?
Do you believe noone should discuss the personality of the most powerful man on earth?

1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. Stop trolling.

Anyone who believes Bush is sane is neurotic. From your posts I also guess that you are kind of psycho-rigid.
I read hundreds of books of psychoanalysis. Sorry, I haven't compiled a list.

Is that a diagnosis based on those books you read?

Do you believe Bush is sane?

My oppinions are irrelevant since I am not a trained psycologist or psychiatrist and I have not had any sessions with him to form any conclusions.

 

[Nietzscheusw]

Originally posted by: XZeroII

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: XZeroII

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: XZeroII
It's VERY unprofessional to try to diagnose someone without first sitting down with the person and talking with him. Otherwise, you could just call a shrink and they could tell you whats wrong and what to do right over the phone.

Anyone who actually believes any of this is not too bright.

Do you believe Bush is sane?
Do you believe noone should discuss the personality of the most powerful man on earth?

1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. Stop trolling.

Anyone who believes Bush is sane is neurotic. From your posts I also guess that you are kind of psycho-rigid.
I read hundreds of books of psychoanalysis. Sorry, I haven't compiled a list.

Is that a diagnosis based on those books you read?

Do you believe Bush is sane?

My oppinions are irrelevant since I am not a trained psycologist or psychiatrist and I have not had any sessions with him to form any conclusions.

Sigmund Freud psychoanalyzed Leonardo da Vinci in one of his books.
Every wednesday, with his colleagues, he used to psychoanalyze famous people (who were not present).
You are a little anal, too.

 

[XZeroII]

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: XZeroII
My oppinions are irrelevant since I am not a trained psycologist or psychiatrist and I have not had any sessions with him to form any conclusions.

Sigmund Freud psychoanalyzed Leonardo da Vinci in one of his books.
Every wednesday, with his colleagues, he used to psychoanalyze famous people (who were not present).
You are a little anal, too.

1. That doesn't mean that Freud was right about those people
2. Freud was an actual psycologist, I am not even close.
3. You are very judgemental

 

[Nietzscheusw]

Originally posted by: XZeroII

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: XZeroII
My oppinions are irrelevant since I am not a trained psycologist or psychiatrist and I have not had any sessions with him to form any conclusions.

Sigmund Freud psychoanalyzed Leonardo da Vinci in one of his books.
Every wednesday, with his colleagues, he used to psychoanalyze famous people (who were not present).
You are a little anal, too.

1. That doesn't mean that Freud was right about those people
2. Freud was an actual psycologist, I am not even close.
3. You are very judgemental

Freud was a psychoanalyst. He invented psychoanalysis. He was a doctor/neurologist before that. You know little.

 

[XZeroII]

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: XZeroII

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: XZeroII
My oppinions are irrelevant since I am not a trained psycologist or psychiatrist and I have not had any sessions with him to form any conclusions.

Sigmund Freud psychoanalyzed Leonardo da Vinci in one of his books.
Every wednesday, with his colleagues, he used to psychoanalyze famous people (who were not present).
You are a little anal, too.

1. That doesn't mean that Freud was right about those people
2. Freud was an actual psycologist, I am not even close.
3. You are very judgemental

Freud was a psychoanalyst. He invented psychoanalysis. He was a doctor/neurologist before that. You know little.

Now who's anal? (not Freud's second stage of development)

 

[Nietzscheusw]

Originally posted by: XZeroII

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: XZeroII

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: XZeroII
My oppinions are irrelevant since I am not a trained psycologist or psychiatrist and I have not had any sessions with him to form any conclusions.

Sigmund Freud psychoanalyzed Leonardo da Vinci in one of his books.
Every wednesday, with his colleagues, he used to psychoanalyze famous people (who were not present).
You are a little anal, too.

1. That doesn't mean that Freud was right about those people
2. Freud was an actual psycologist, I am not even close.
3. You are very judgemental

Freud was a psychoanalyst. He invented psychoanalysis. He was a doctor/neurologist before that. You know little.

Now who's anal? (not Freud's second stage of development)

Now who ignores the huge difference between psychology and psychoanalysis?

 

[XZeroII]

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: XZeroII
Now who's anal? (not Freud's second stage of development)

Now who ignores the huge difference between psychology and psychoanalysis?

Alvin Wyman Walker, PhD, PD, PC, is a clinical psychologist/psychotherapist. He has a PhD in Personality/Social Psychology/Cultural Anthropology and the equivalent of a second PhD in Clinical Psychology.

What makes this guy qualified to talk about Bush, then? If psycoanalysts are the ones who 'analyze' people they've never met, then this guy isn't qualified to write that paper.

 

[Moonbeam]

Bush generates a tremendous amount of hate because of transference. People see in Bush traumatic experiences from their past, the insensitive Butt-Head parent who messed us over. The world divides along the lines of those who reject that form of behavior seeking something real but seeking it neurotically, and those who try to ally and conform to that power to escape it's persecution.

 

[Moonbeam]

By the way, I need evidence that Kerry is this nuts since he and Bush are the same before I waste my vote on Nader.

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
By the way, I need evidence that Kerry is this nuts since he and Bush are the same before I waste my vote on Nader.

Well, we have plenty of options.

I kinda like this guy. He has the coolest party name!

 

[Nietzscheusw]

Originally posted by: XZeroII

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: XZeroII
Now who's anal? (not Freud's second stage of development)

Now who ignores the huge difference between psychology and psychoanalysis?

Alvin Wyman Walker, PhD, PD, PC, is a clinical psychologist/psychotherapist. He has a PhD in Personality/Social Psychology/Cultural Anthropology and the equivalent of a second PhD in Clinical Psychology.

What makes this guy qualified to talk about Bush, then? If psycoanalysts are the ones who 'analyze' people they've never met, then this guy isn't qualified to write that paper.

He is a psychotherapist. That is a lighter form of psychoanalyst.

 

[Nietzscheusw]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
By the way, I need evidence that Kerry is this nuts since he and Bush are the same before I waste my vote on Nader.

Schizophrenia cha cha cha!:evil:

 

[burnedout]

Originally posted by: conjur
I kinda like this guy. He has the coolest party name!

National Barking Spider Resurgence Party, eh?

Organizations:
Member, Laughter Crafters (online humor writer collective), 2002-present
Member, The NetWits (online humor writer collective), 2000-present
Member, National Society of Newspaper Columnists, 1998-present.

Heck, why not?

 

[Nietzscheusw]

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: conjur
I kinda like this guy. He has the coolest party name!

National Barking Spider Resurgence Party, eh?

Organizations:
Member, Laughter Crafters (online humor writer collective), 2002-present
Member, The NetWits (online humor writer collective), 2000-present
Member, National Society of Newspaper Columnists, 1998-present.

Heck, why not?

Bush would be a much more credible candidate if he ran for them.