- Oct 12, 2009
- 43,973
- 6,336
- 136
Four different types of reusable bottle were tested after they were used by athletes for a week, and the results were shocking.
The study found that the average athlete’s water bottle had 313,499 CFU (colony-forming units of bacteria).
In comparison the average dog toy has 2,937.
But some types of water bottle came out worse than others.
The slide-top water bottle may be handy to stop unwanted spillages while you pound it out on the treadmill or even while running for the morning bus, but it harboured the most germs.
The slide top bottles tested had a whopping average of 933,340 CFU, while straw top water bottles were a clear winner with a mere 25.4 CFU.
The classic screw-top bottles had 159,060 CFU, meaning that a swig from that is about as bad as lapping up water from your kitchen sink.
And the squeeze top had an average of 161,971 CFU.
However, although paling in comparison to the shocking levels found on the slide top, the squeeze top’s bacteria was a lot more harmful.
Nearly 99 per cent of the bacteria found on the bottle was classed as harmful and there were traces of antibiotic-immune bacteria, such as the food poisoning-causing E. coli.
In total, over 60 per cent of the germs found on water bottles in the study had the potential to make you sick.
http://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/20...bottles-have-more-bacteria-than-dog-toys.html
The study found that the average athlete’s water bottle had 313,499 CFU (colony-forming units of bacteria).
In comparison the average dog toy has 2,937.
But some types of water bottle came out worse than others.
The slide-top water bottle may be handy to stop unwanted spillages while you pound it out on the treadmill or even while running for the morning bus, but it harboured the most germs.
The slide top bottles tested had a whopping average of 933,340 CFU, while straw top water bottles were a clear winner with a mere 25.4 CFU.
The classic screw-top bottles had 159,060 CFU, meaning that a swig from that is about as bad as lapping up water from your kitchen sink.
And the squeeze top had an average of 161,971 CFU.
However, although paling in comparison to the shocking levels found on the slide top, the squeeze top’s bacteria was a lot more harmful.
Nearly 99 per cent of the bacteria found on the bottle was classed as harmful and there were traces of antibiotic-immune bacteria, such as the food poisoning-causing E. coli.
In total, over 60 per cent of the germs found on water bottles in the study had the potential to make you sick.
http://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/20...bottles-have-more-bacteria-than-dog-toys.html