• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

PSA: Xerox photocopiers found to alter text and change numbers in scans and copies

Mark R

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
8,513
16
81
Sounds "rediculous", but it is true. A German researcher has discovered that certain all-in-one business machines made by Xerox subtly alter text and numbers in scans and copies, while making the alterations look "real" and not like a bad photocopy.

This was first noticed after he copied some architectural plans, but on the copies found that the room dimensions were wrong (obviously smaller rooms had large dimensions on their size labels - for example, a label which read "14.13 m" read "17.42 m" on the copy. The copy was clear and easily readable and this did not look like you would expect a miscopy to look). Subsequent tests with test documents including simulated accounting entries and invoices, showed that numbers were systematically altered in the copies.

Since highlighting this problem, this has been widely replicated at other sites.

If you are using a xerox scanner or photocopier for business purposes, you are strongly advised to manually check each copy to ensure that the text matches the original and has not been altered. If you work in an industry where safety of life is important (healthcare, civil engineering, etc.) and use Xerox photocopying equipment, this is particularly important.

Xerox photocopiers alter text
 
Last edited:

darkewaffle

Diamond Member
Oct 7, 2005
8,152
1
81
The blog post details that it's compression algorithm, evidently the culprit is something called "JBIG2". Basically it turns parts of the image into a patchwork quilt and replicates part of the image when it finds different patches to be 'close enough'. When characters are small enough or the image is low enough resolution, it can cause inadvertent swaps. It only applies to "Normal" mode scans, and the machines evidently have "High" as their default setting; other settings do not use JBIG2.

Further, this does not affect copies. Only scans.
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,741
456
126
Just tested with our two office printers: a WorkCentre 5755 and ColorQube 9303

Both were ok in the 3 runs I sent through each using the test blueprint
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,228
136
Damn, I know the blog's writer isn't American, but his grammar isn't very good and makes the entries difficult to read. I hate having to interpret what's written to get the real meaning. And I wish people would learn how to use commas.
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,741
456
126
Damn, I know the blog's writer isn't American, but his grammar isn't very good and makes the entries difficult to read. I hate having to interpret what's written to get the real meaning. And I wish people would learn how to use commas.

You did that on purpose didn't you?

Sneaky...
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
Trying to use OCR to print out sharp text, but failing to recognize the source characters correctly.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Doubtful as I would assume the TOS you agree to when you purchase/use it limits their liability.
It wouldn't surprise me.

"This is our product. If it screws up because of some error on our part, that sucks for you. In using this, you forfeit your right to sue us, or pursue criminal charges against us for any reason, related or unrelated to use of this product. Our competitors have done the same thing. Again, sucks for you. Our legal team invites you to gently suckle their genitals."




definitely good to know. numbers are kind of a big deal these days.
Bah, what's one or two orders of magnitude between friends? :D



That's more benign than I assumed. I assumed it was copy protection to introduce non-obvious flaws.
Copy protection that works so well, it won't let you make copies of anything.
 
Last edited: