Actually it's not believe it or not.. This is purely a concern about me having to spend my tax dollars subsidizing unhealthy people who abuse their bodies. I'm all for people abusing their bodies but soon as you get my money involved whether it be tax dollars or insurance premiums, I then have a say in what I think people should and shouldn't eat. You can thank all the people that have mandated the government control their lives for this.I think this is a poorly disguised attempt the OP to reducing CO2 emmisions. Reduced red meat consumption will reduce the amount of livestock, reducing CO2 emissions into the atmosphere.
Why not lobby the trucking industry to increase their tire pressure to sidewall max while you're at it?
Actually it's not believe it or not.. This is purely a concern about me having to spend my tax dollars subsidizing unhealthy people who abuse their bodies. I'm all for people abusing their bodies but soon as you get my money involved whether it be tax dollars or insurance premiums, I then have a say in what I think people should and shouldn't eat. You can thank all the people that have mandated the government control their lives for this.
Otherwise, on the bright side, the positives are that you'll live an overall better life.
Actually it's not believe it or not.. This is purely a concern about me having to spend my tax dollars subsidizing unhealthy people who abuse their bodies. I'm all for people abusing their bodies but soon as you get my money involved whether it be tax dollars or insurance premiums, I then have a say in what I think people should and shouldn't eat. You can thank all the people that have mandated the government control their lives for this.
Otherwise, on the bright side, the positives are that you'll live an overall better life.
Actually it's not believe it or not.. This is purely a concern about me having to spend my tax dollars subsidizing unhealthy people who abuse their bodies. I'm all for people abusing their bodies but soon as you get my money involved whether it be tax dollars or insurance premiums, I then have a say in what I think people should and shouldn't eat. You can thank all the people that have mandated the government control their lives for this.
Otherwise, on the bright side, the positives are that you'll live an overall better life.
um.... not necessarily.. The main cost is when these people get help and their lives are extended through the use of pharmaceuticals. So the only way that would be true is if the 50 year old just flat out died, almost in an unexpected way. Who says the same can't happen to the 80 or 90 year old? My grandmother who lived to 90 only really started to get expensive treatment when she was like 87 because she fell and broke her hip, which from then on was her true downfall and life from then on got significantly worse for her. She ate badly "relatively speaking" but she could have been far worse. In other words, she ate well enough to live a long time but not well enough to live a more fruitful life in her later years. One would have hoped that if she took care of herself her whole life, she wouldn't have had such bad osteoporosis as she did.Obese people who die of heart attacks at 50 years old cost way less to care for than healthy people who live to 80 or 90.
Indeed.
STOP FEEDING THE TROLL.
Koing
This is purely a concern about me having to spend my tax dollars
Actually it's not believe it or not.. This is purely a concern about me having to spend my tax dollars subsidizing unhealthy people who abuse their bodies. I'm all for people abusing their bodies but soon as you get my money involved whether it be tax dollars or insurance premiums, I then have a say in what I think people should and shouldn't eat. You can thank all the people that have mandated the government control their lives for this.
Otherwise, on the bright side, the positives are that you'll live an overall better life.
Sweet, I can eat bottle caps and radium if I run twice a day?sounds like someone does not want to get their lazy ass off the couch. You can eat whateverthefuck you want if you exercise enough.
Sweet, I can eat bottle caps and radium if I run twice a day?![]()
Sweet, I can eat bottle caps and radium if I run twice a day?![]()
Sweet, I can eat bottle caps and radium if I run twice a day?![]()
Not suppose to eat more than 10 ounces of red meat a week. That means two decks of cards worth of red meat. I wonder how many people are going to argue with me about this over here..
I know "red meat" is a broad category but red meat is red meat.. I'm not sure where they came up with specifically red meat but it is what it is.
Actually it's not believe it or not.. This is purely a concern about me having to spend my tax dollars subsidizing unhealthy people who abuse their bodies. I'm all for people abusing their bodies but soon as you get my money involved whether it be tax dollars or insurance premiums, I then have a say in what I think people should and shouldn't eat. You can thank all the people that have mandated the government control their lives for this.
Otherwise, on the bright side, the positives are that you'll live an overall better life.
Why would anyone argue with fleabag? Do people really like losing that much?
Obviously 'it is what it is' isn't one of the expressions you abhor.
Judging from your lack of exercise and love of canned sardines, cheap pasta and ramen noodles, tax dollars will someday be subsizing your ignorant, cheap-assed, body-abusing lifestyle. (And unlike you, I actually pay taxes.)
They already are.
um.... not necessarily.. The main cost is when these people get help and their lives are extended through the use of pharmaceuticals. So the only way that would be true is if the 50 year old just flat out died, almost in an unexpected way. Who says the same can't happen to the 80 or 90 year old? My grandmother who lived to 90 only really started to get expensive treatment when she was like 87 because she fell and broke her hip, which from then on was her true downfall and life from then on got significantly worse for her. She ate badly "relatively speaking" but she could have been far worse. In other words, she ate well enough to live a long time but not well enough to live a more fruitful life in her later years. One would have hoped that if she took care of herself her whole life, she wouldn't have had such bad osteoporosis as she did.
it's part of growing up.
:hmm:
STOP FEEDING THE TROLL RED MEAT...
Tomorrow I'm gonna cook a burger a giant fat rare burger, and risk delicious meaty death.