• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

PSA: The Mustang Is Not A Sports Car

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: playstation3
mustangs stopped being muscle cars a long time ago. muscle cars are extinct. have fun racing teenagers in your big crappy sports car.




Please explain how they are extinct?

No. Not extinct, just dying out. They're time has been over for ages.

well yeah ok if you want to be all anal about it, not extinct, endangered then.
 
Originally posted by: Safeway
Originally posted by: jhayx7
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: andylawcc
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: andylawcc
don't care. you are a jack ass

Ahh I see the kiddies haven't gone to bed yet.

look who's talking. if you so mature and secure, why bother making this post to clarify what OTHERS people would perceive about YOU. Why, you are too insecure with your statements and image?


Seriously dude you haven't read a word of my post, and quite frankly you are the one acting like an asshole as my purpose of this thread is to discuss what others think. If you read you would know that. So I suggest you stop posting in my thread before you make yourself look anymore ignorant and arrogant than you already are.

You seriously thought this thread would not start a flame war?

Shut up, both of you. This is a thread about the sh!tty Mustang interior and the method of classifying a car a sports car or a muscle car. Shooting personal insults back and forth was no where in the thread description.

which two are you refering?
 
Originally posted by: playstation3
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: playstation3
mustangs stopped being muscle cars a long time ago. muscle cars are extinct. have fun racing teenagers in your big crappy sports car.




Please explain how they are extinct?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_car

A muscle car is a high-performance automobile. The term principally refers to American, Australian and South African models with large-capacity engines produced between 1964 and 1973 for American cars and between 1968 and 1976 for Australian cars.

I'd say thats an accurate description of how I also see it.

By that definition the 5.0 mustang fox bodies are muscle cars...and actually 4.6L is pretty big compared to other cars. Not to mention the whole retro styling coming out everywhere, called the Muscle Car resurgence by better automotive sources than wikipedia.
 
Originally posted by: Aimster
What does a stock Cobra run? How much does it cost?

I honestly have no clue but I am guessing mid 13s? 30k sticker?

Low Low Low 13's and if you are a good driver, high 12's. Easily modable and motor can handle a great deal of power.
 
Originally posted by: Aimster
What does a stock Cobra run? How much does it cost?

I honestly have no clue but I am guessing mid 13s? 30k sticker?

Which year? GT500 costs ~50k and the Terminator 03-04 was 34 for the coupe. Both run in the mid 12s with a good (i.e. great) driver.
 
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: playstation3
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: playstation3
mustangs stopped being muscle cars a long time ago. muscle cars are extinct. have fun racing teenagers in your big crappy sports car.




Please explain how they are extinct?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_car

A muscle car is a high-performance automobile. The term principally refers to American, Australian and South African models with large-capacity engines produced between 1964 and 1973 for American cars and between 1968 and 1976 for Australian cars.

I'd say thats an accurate description of how I also see it.

By that definition the 5.0 mustang fox bodies are muscle cars...and actually 4.6L is pretty big compared to other cars. Not to mention the whole retro styling coming out everywhere, called the Muscle Car resurgence by better automotive sources than wikipedia.

Indeed, but they are no longer in production. thats what i meant by extinct. and I assumed you meant your mustang, as indicated by your sig.
 
Originally posted by: grrl
I'm sorry that others are making your penis shrink by calling it a mere sports car.

They aren't as I don't buy cars because of penis size, I buy cars because of what I like. And it would be a lie to say you don't buy a brand new car without considering what others think.
 
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: Aimster
Mustang is not that fast of a car....

It's all relative. A V6, yes you are right. A V6 compared to a Honda Civic, V6 wins. Mustang GT, yeah pretty fast, can beat a lot. Compared to a 55AMG, it loses. Cobra, fast as hell. Compared to a Lambo, it loses. Most else it beats. A Cobra with a twin screw and supporting mods, beats everything including a ferarri etc. and for a fraction of the price. Of course that is just straight line. So once again it is all relative.

Oh wow, a car with mods beats a stock car? Really? So because you have a modded Mustang that means it is super awesome number one ^_^?

STFU about cars, especially the dumb tossing Mustang. Right now.

And FYI a Civic with the 200hp(STOCK) motor will rip a V6 Mustang into shreds.
 
Originally posted by: playstation3
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: playstation3
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: playstation3
mustangs stopped being muscle cars a long time ago. muscle cars are extinct. have fun racing teenagers in your big crappy sports car.




Please explain how they are extinct?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_car

A muscle car is a high-performance automobile. The term principally refers to American, Australian and South African models with large-capacity engines produced between 1964 and 1973 for American cars and between 1968 and 1976 for Australian cars.

I'd say thats an accurate description of how I also see it.

By that definition the 5.0 mustang fox bodies are muscle cars...and actually 4.6L is pretty big compared to other cars. Not to mention the whole retro styling coming out everywhere, called the Muscle Car resurgence by better automotive sources than wikipedia.

Indeed, but they are no longer in production. thats what i meant by extinct. and I assumed you meant your mustang, as indicated by your sig.

I do agree that the golden age of muscle cars is over, nothing will ever top the 70's challenger and Boss 302, a 68 GT500KR, and the like.
 
The trouble with this thread is that the term sports car is not a very well defined term. Ask 5 different people what a sports car is and you'll likely get 5 different answers. That said, I would define a sports car as any one or two passenger vehicle that is low slung, powerful, and handles and brakes very well...basically, a Lotus Elise. 😛

Still, I'm probably as guilty as anyone for misusing that term. 😱
 
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: Aimster
Mustang is not that fast of a car....

It's all relative. A V6, yes you are right. A V6 compared to a Honda Civic, V6 wins. Mustang GT, yeah pretty fast, can beat a lot. Compared to a 55AMG, it loses. Cobra, fast as hell. Compared to a Lambo, it loses. Most else it beats. A Cobra with a twin screw and supporting mods, beats everything including a ferarri etc. and for a fraction of the price. Of course that is just straight line. So once again it is all relative.

Oh wow, a car with mods beats a stock car? Really? So because you have a modded Mustang that means it is super awesome number one ^_^?

STFU about cars, especially the dumb tossing Mustang. Right now.

And FYI a Civic with the 200hp(STOCK) motor will rip a V6 Mustang into shreds.


2005 Ford Mustang V-6 6.9 15.3

2006 Honda Civic SI 7.2 15.1


????????? If you are talking about handling then yes but in straight line it's all in the driver.
 
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: Aimster
Mustang is not that fast of a car....

It's all relative. A V6, yes you are right. A V6 compared to a Honda Civic, V6 wins. Mustang GT, yeah pretty fast, can beat a lot. Compared to a 55AMG, it loses. Cobra, fast as hell. Compared to a Lambo, it loses. Most else it beats. A Cobra with a twin screw and supporting mods, beats everything including a ferarri etc. and for a fraction of the price. Of course that is just straight line. So once again it is all relative.

Oh wow, a car with mods beats a stock car? Really? So because you have a modded Mustang that means it is super awesome number one ^_^?

STFU about cars, especially the dumb tossing Mustang. Right now.

And FYI a Civic with the 200hp(STOCK) motor will rip a V6 Mustang into shreds.

Troll troll troll your boat.

Stock or not, compare prices, the Cobra with the mods is far cheaper. And, I never said it was a better car. Please go to bed so you can be awake for school tomorrow and learn reading comprehension, how to debate without cussing, and forming an argument.

EDIT: And no, a stock run of the mill civic will not beat a V6.
 
Originally posted by: zerocool84
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: Aimster
Mustang is not that fast of a car....

It's all relative. A V6, yes you are right. A V6 compared to a Honda Civic, V6 wins. Mustang GT, yeah pretty fast, can beat a lot. Compared to a 55AMG, it loses. Cobra, fast as hell. Compared to a Lambo, it loses. Most else it beats. A Cobra with a twin screw and supporting mods, beats everything including a ferarri etc. and for a fraction of the price. Of course that is just straight line. So once again it is all relative.

Oh wow, a car with mods beats a stock car? Really? So because you have a modded Mustang that means it is super awesome number one ^_^?

STFU about cars, especially the dumb tossing Mustang. Right now.

And FYI a Civic with the 200hp(STOCK) motor will rip a V6 Mustang into shreds.


2005 Ford Mustang V-6 6.9 15.3

2006 Honda Civic SI 7.2 15.1


????????? If you are talking about handling then yes but in straight line it's all in the driver.

2007 v6 Mustang's are much quicker. They run closer to 14.2 seconds.
 
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: zerocool84
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: Aimster
Mustang is not that fast of a car....

It's all relative. A V6, yes you are right. A V6 compared to a Honda Civic, V6 wins. Mustang GT, yeah pretty fast, can beat a lot. Compared to a 55AMG, it loses. Cobra, fast as hell. Compared to a Lambo, it loses. Most else it beats. A Cobra with a twin screw and supporting mods, beats everything including a ferarri etc. and for a fraction of the price. Of course that is just straight line. So once again it is all relative.

Oh wow, a car with mods beats a stock car? Really? So because you have a modded Mustang that means it is super awesome number one ^_^?

STFU about cars, especially the dumb tossing Mustang. Right now.

And FYI a Civic with the 200hp(STOCK) motor will rip a V6 Mustang into shreds.


2005 Ford Mustang V-6 6.9 15.3

2006 Honda Civic SI 7.2 15.1


????????? If you are talking about handling then yes but in straight line it's all in the driver.

2007 v6 Mustang's are much quicker. They run closer to 14.2 seconds.

Downhill with tailwind maybe but stock, never
 
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: Aimster
Mustang is not that fast of a car....

It's all relative. A V6, yes you are right. A V6 compared to a Honda Civic, V6 wins. Mustang GT, yeah pretty fast, can beat a lot. Compared to a 55AMG, it loses. Cobra, fast as hell. Compared to a Lambo, it loses. Most else it beats. A Cobra with a twin screw and supporting mods, beats everything including a ferarri etc. and for a fraction of the price. Of course that is just straight line. So once again it is all relative.
Oh wow, a car with mods beats a stock car? Really? So because you have a modded Mustang that means it is super awesome number one ^_^?

STFU about cars, especially the dumb tossing Mustang. Right now.

And FYI a Civic with the 200hp(STOCK) motor will rip a V6 Mustang into shreds.
Of course a car with mods beats a stock car, he's not arguing that any which way. Did you read his description of it above in reply to my post? I'm assuming most of you have never driven a car with a good bit of power (300-500HP) in a car.

I don't think it even matters if a Civic can beat the Mustang for his point.
 
Originally posted by: zerocool84
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: Aimster
Mustang is not that fast of a car....

It's all relative. A V6, yes you are right. A V6 compared to a Honda Civic, V6 wins. Mustang GT, yeah pretty fast, can beat a lot. Compared to a 55AMG, it loses. Cobra, fast as hell. Compared to a Lambo, it loses. Most else it beats. A Cobra with a twin screw and supporting mods, beats everything including a ferarri etc. and for a fraction of the price. Of course that is just straight line. So once again it is all relative.

Oh wow, a car with mods beats a stock car? Really? So because you have a modded Mustang that means it is super awesome number one ^_^?

STFU about cars, especially the dumb tossing Mustang. Right now.

And FYI a Civic with the 200hp(STOCK) motor will rip a V6 Mustang into shreds.


2005 Ford Mustang V-6 6.9 15.3

2006 Honda Civic SI 7.2 15.1


????????? If you are talking about handling then yes but in straight line it's all in the driver.

Er, can you read? the latter figure is 0.2 faster, not only that but that joke you get in the US must have one permanently braked wheel:

Honda is at pains to insist that this doesn't mean the 2007 Type-R's gone soft, though. There's 198bhp on offer from the 2.0-litre i-VTEC engine and performance has not been watered down: 0-62mph still comes up in 6.6 seconds.

Take off 0.1 to be conservative with the 0-60 and your V6 is looking pretty weak sauce.
 
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: Aimster
Mustang is not that fast of a car....

It's all relative. A V6, yes you are right. A V6 compared to a Honda Civic, V6 wins. Mustang GT, yeah pretty fast, can beat a lot. Compared to a 55AMG, it loses. Cobra, fast as hell. Compared to a Lambo, it loses. Most else it beats. A Cobra with a twin screw and supporting mods, beats everything including a ferarri etc. and for a fraction of the price. Of course that is just straight line. So once again it is all relative.

Oh wow, a car with mods beats a stock car? Really? So because you have a modded Mustang that means it is super awesome number one ^_^?

STFU about cars, especially the dumb tossing Mustang. Right now.

And FYI a Civic with the 200hp(STOCK) motor will rip a V6 Mustang into shreds.

Who the hell buys a V6 Mustang? Or buys it to race Civics? 😕
 
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: Aimster
Mustang is not that fast of a car....

It's all relative. A V6, yes you are right. A V6 compared to a Honda Civic, V6 wins. Mustang GT, yeah pretty fast, can beat a lot. Compared to a 55AMG, it loses. Cobra, fast as hell. Compared to a Lambo, it loses. Most else it beats. A Cobra with a twin screw and supporting mods, beats everything including a ferarri etc. and for a fraction of the price. Of course that is just straight line. So once again it is all relative.

Oh wow, a car with mods beats a stock car? Really? So because you have a modded Mustang that means it is super awesome number one ^_^?

STFU about cars, especially the dumb tossing Mustang. Right now.

And FYI a Civic with the 200hp(STOCK) motor will rip a V6 Mustang into shreds.

Troll troll troll your boat.

Stock or not, compare prices, the Cobra with the mods is far cheaper. And, I never said it was a better car. Please go to bed so you can be awake for school tomorrow and learn reading comprehension, how to debate without cussing, and forming an argument.

EDIT: And no, a stock run of the mill civic will not beat a V6.

Yes it will. See my earlier post.
 
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Troll troll troll your boat.

Stock or not, compare prices, the Cobra with the mods is far cheaper. And, I never said it was a better car. Please go to bed so you can be awake for school tomorrow and learn reading comprehension, how to debate without cussing, and forming an argument.

EDIT: And no, a stock run of the mill civic will not beat a V6.

irony. retorting to calling other people a troll when you disagree with other's point of view.
 
Originally posted by: AgaBoogaBoo
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: Aimster
Mustang is not that fast of a car....

It's all relative. A V6, yes you are right. A V6 compared to a Honda Civic, V6 wins. Mustang GT, yeah pretty fast, can beat a lot. Compared to a 55AMG, it loses. Cobra, fast as hell. Compared to a Lambo, it loses. Most else it beats. A Cobra with a twin screw and supporting mods, beats everything including a ferarri etc. and for a fraction of the price. Of course that is just straight line. So once again it is all relative.
Oh wow, a car with mods beats a stock car? Really? So because you have a modded Mustang that means it is super awesome number one ^_^?

STFU about cars, especially the dumb tossing Mustang. Right now.

And FYI a Civic with the 200hp(STOCK) motor will rip a V6 Mustang into shreds.
Of course a car with mods beats a stock car, he's not arguing that any which way. Did you read his description of it above in reply to my post? I'm assuming most of you have never driven a car with a good bit of power (300-500HP) in a car.

I don't think it even matters if a Civic can beat the Mustang for his point.

I drive an e46 M3 with 343hp, thanks for playing. :roll:

Can you read bolded text?
 
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: zerocool84
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: Aimster
Mustang is not that fast of a car....

It's all relative. A V6, yes you are right. A V6 compared to a Honda Civic, V6 wins. Mustang GT, yeah pretty fast, can beat a lot. Compared to a 55AMG, it loses. Cobra, fast as hell. Compared to a Lambo, it loses. Most else it beats. A Cobra with a twin screw and supporting mods, beats everything including a ferarri etc. and for a fraction of the price. Of course that is just straight line. So once again it is all relative.

Oh wow, a car with mods beats a stock car? Really? So because you have a modded Mustang that means it is super awesome number one ^_^?

STFU about cars, especially the dumb tossing Mustang. Right now.

And FYI a Civic with the 200hp(STOCK) motor will rip a V6 Mustang into shreds.


2005 Ford Mustang V-6 6.9 15.3

2006 Honda Civic SI 7.2 15.1


????????? If you are talking about handling then yes but in straight line it's all in the driver.

Er, can you read? the latter figure is 0.2 faster, not only that but that joke you get in the US must have one permanently braked wheel:

Honda is at pains to insist that this doesn't mean the 2007 Type-R's gone soft, though. There's 198bhp on offer from the 2.0-litre i-VTEC engine and performance has not been watered down: 0-62mph still comes up in 6.6 seconds.

Take off 0.1 to be conservative with the 0-60 and your V6 is looking pretty weak sauce.

While I would rather not argue semantics, if you are going to use the numbers of a civic type R, then I guess you would then have to up the Mustang from a V6 to a GT. As we were talking a base civic vs a base v6. I am not sure of the pricing but I would guess a Type R and GT are in similar price brackets.
 
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: andylawcc
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
Originally posted by: andylawcc
don't care. you are a jack ass

Ahh I see the kiddies haven't gone to bed yet.

look who's talking. if you so mature and secure, why bother making this post to clarify what OTHERS people would perceive about YOU. Why, you are too insecure with your statements and image?


Seriously dude you haven't read a word of my post, and quite frankly you are the one acting like an asshole as my purpose of this thread is to discuss what others think. If you read you would know that. So I suggest you stop posting in my thread before you make yourself look anymore ignorant and arrogant than you already are.

OMGTEHIRONING!!@!!1one!
 
Back
Top