• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

PSA: pics.bbzzdd.com

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
just thought of something - sometimes we leave comments for a pic ... and that pic can be named something obscure that we would never remember the name again to find it.

What about a history (which links to) the files you left comments for ? A simple/short linked "history" list of comments left (or even files viewed)... Would that be difficult to implement ?
 
Originally posted by: rh71
just thought of something - sometimes we leave comments for a pic ... and that pic can be named something obscure that we would never remember the name again to find it.

What about a history (which links to) the files you left comments for ? A simple linked "history" list of comments left (or even files viewed)... Would that be difficult to implement ?

No I've already been working on a History / Favourites list.
 
Originally posted by: rh71
we were already stealing ideas from it... 😉 I put flickr in the news comments...
My design for pics 3.0 was a gmail rip-off 🙂

 
i refreshed for about 10 min and it still not there

Not Found

The requested URL /home.php was not found on this server.
Apache/2.0.46 (Red Hat) PHP/4.3.10 mod_ssl/2.0.46 OpenSSL/0.9.7a Server at pics.bbzzdd.com Port 80
 
I hate that when I click an image it onyl opens it up small again and then I have to click it again in the next screen to get it fullsize. Could add a link from the gallery page to just view it fullsize with one click...

Of course if I just viewed the image fullsize right away then I couldn't view the extra data and vote on it and such. Maybe have 2 options like over at ppiiccss where you can click to view fullsize or click to view the details...
 
Originally posted by: dwell
Originally posted by: rh71
we were already stealing ideas from it... 😉 I put flickr in the news comments...
My design for pics 3.0 was a gmail rip-off 🙂
you were working on 3.0 also ? Or you meant 2.0 ?
 
Originally posted by: FrankyJunior
I hate that when I click an image it onyl opens it up small again and then I have to click it again in the next screen to get it fullsize. Could add a link from the gallery page to just view it fullsize with one click...
More than likely, this is a bandwidth-saving device. If we want pics.bbzzdd.com to stick around, I think this is something we might have to live with.

Either way, GREAT job on the redesign. Very easy to use.
 
Originally posted by: rh71
you were working on 3.0 also ? Or you meant 2.0 ?
I had 3.0 planned out a year ago and wrote almost the whole back end in PHP5. Over the course of developing it I realized PHP 5 sucked and scrapped the whole thing, got busy and lazy and never got back to it. dnaj wrote me one day asking to code the site and I was like, "Who the **** is this guy?" 🙂

 
Originally posted by: dwell
Originally posted by: rh71
you were working on 3.0 also ? Or you meant 2.0 ?
I had 3.0 planned out a year ago and wrote almost the whole back end in PHP5. Over the course of developing it I realized PHP 5 sucked and scrapped the whole thing, got busy and lazy and never got back to it. dnaj wrote me one day asking to code the site and I was like, "Who the **** is this guy?" 🙂

Liar, it was more like "Only if you be my friend".
 
Originally posted by: jumpr
Originally posted by: FrankyJunior
I hate that when I click an image it onyl opens it up small again and then I have to click it again in the next screen to get it fullsize. Could add a link from the gallery page to just view it fullsize with one click...
More than likely, this is a bandwidth-saving device.
Hmm, not so sure about that - what do we gain by seeing the image details with the same exact thumbnail again (more loading/bandwidth) ? Is it the hope that the user will give up on it and not go for the full image again ? I just don't see that it was done purposely/exclusively to save bandwidth... but perhaps to see the DETAILS on the image. We'll soon be able to swap click / shift-click according to danny... it's all good so long as it works 100% of the time instead of 60%. 😉
 
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: jumpr
Originally posted by: FrankyJunior
I hate that when I click an image it onyl opens it up small again and then I have to click it again in the next screen to get it fullsize. Could add a link from the gallery page to just view it fullsize with one click...
More than likely, this is a bandwidth-saving device.
Hmm, not so sure about that - what do we gain by seeing the image details with the same exact thumbnail again (more loading/bandwidth) ? Is it the hope that the user will give up on it and not go for the full image again ? I just don't see that it was done purposely/exclusively to save bandwidth...

It wasn't, hence the feature to shift+click to open the fullsize image in a new window.
 
Originally posted by: DnaJ
Liar, it was more like "Only if you be my friend".
Actually you discovered all my alternative lifestyle pr0n and the only way I could get out of you telling everyone was to let you code the site. Now that I am out I don't really care if you tell them 😛

 
Originally posted by: dwell
Originally posted by: DnaJ
Liar, it was more like "Only if you be my friend".
Actually you discovered all my alternative lifestyle pr0n and the only way I could get out of you telling everyone was to let you code the site. Now that I am out I don't really care if you tell them 😛

Would you like me to tell everyone what type of pr0n it was? :evil:
 
question about NSFW again ... sometimes Yahoo Entertainment pages have pics of celebs in evening gowns which show a little cleavage and all that jazz. Are these supposed to be marked NSFW too?
 
Back
Top