• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

PSA: Doom 3

AFB

Lifer
<rant type="bored">

It's a game people--- A FVCK!N GAME!!!!1!! Do we really need 50 threads about it ? It can't be that good, can it ?

</rant>
 
Do we need 50 threads b!tching and moaning about all the Doom 3 threads?

Did you not see this thread in Forum Issues?
 
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
<rant type="bored">

It's a game people--- A FVCK!N GAME!!!!1!! Do we really need 50 threads about it ? It can't be that good, can it ?

</rant>

Thank you, oh self appointed arbiter of that which is appropriate on the forum.

:roll:
 
What I dont get is how people are so hung up on graphics and sound, when its the basic same gameplay 🙁
 
my radeon 9200 128/128 is playing it just fine at 640x480 with the 4.9 catalysts. cost:$62 🙂
so far, the game has scared the sh!t outta me, and i haven't come against a lot of tough guys yet. damn the darkness, and damn guys with shotguns!
 
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
my radeon 9200 128/128 is playing it just fine at 640x480 with the 4.9 catalysts. cost:$62 🙂
so far, the game has scared the sh!t outta me, and i haven't come against a lot of tough guys yet. damn the darkness, and damn guys with shotguns!


::walking down the corridors::

Nope, nothing over there, let me just go through this...OH HOLY SH!T....

::fires off 5 rounds into a zombie that popped outta nowhere::
 
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
my radeon 9200 128/128 is playing it just fine at 640x480 with the 4.9 catalysts. cost:$62 🙂
so far, the game has scared the sh!t outta me, and i haven't come against a lot of tough guys yet. damn the darkness, and damn guys with shotguns!

Hmmm. Maybe I should grab a copy already. Can't be worse than your's on my Radeon 9500 Pro 🙂 I got 1 GB memory though, will that make a difference?
 
Originally posted by: XietyCOM
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
my radeon 9200 128/128 is playing it just fine at 640x480 with the 4.9 catalysts. cost:$62 🙂
so far, the game has scared the sh!t outta me, and i haven't come against a lot of tough guys yet. damn the darkness, and damn guys with shotguns!

Hmmm. Maybe I should grab a copy already. Can't be worse than your's on my Radeon 9500 Pro 🙂 I got 1 GB memory though, will that make a difference?


My friend's got a Ti4400 and 512mb of RAM and it runs relatively well on his system. Still looks pretty darn good on Medium.
 
i got the visiontek (out of nvida biz now) xtasy ti4200 and it's running well 1024x768, med settings
on xp2500 1gb pc2700 ram

farcry run, never mind, more like walking slooooooowly on the system tho
 
Originally posted by: XietyCOM
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
my radeon 9200 128/128 is playing it just fine at 640x480 with the 4.9 catalysts. cost:$62 🙂
so far, the game has scared the sh!t outta me, and i haven't come against a lot of tough guys yet. damn the darkness, and damn guys with shotguns!

Hmmm. Maybe I should grab a copy already. Can't be worse than your's on my Radeon 9500 Pro 🙂 I got 1 GB memory though, will that make a difference?

Don't worry, 9500 Pro is plenty good. On my overclocked 9600Pro, I can play it at a great frame rate on 800x600 Medium. I only have 512MB RAM. I find that 800x600 is the best looking resolution. Anything above makes the textures seem blurry compared to the resolution. Maybe high quality would make textures better quality, but the game starts to chug a bit on high.
 
Back
Top