you want Playstation if you want it to play games, but if you want a media center, an Xbox One (or a PS3 for that matter) is a better option.Thanks. Have to report my findings to the wife. She wanted Playstation but she doesn't know any better.
Why a console if you're not playing games? Why not a fire tv, roku, apple tv, or the like?
Why a console if you're not playing games? Why not a fire tv, roku, apple tv, or the like?
This was my thought as well. If not gaming, spend a fraction of the money on one of those instead. Even at idle, the gaming consoles will use more juice than the tiny ARM TV boxes.
if i wasn't interested in gaming i wouldnt waste my money on either console.
i'd get one of those chromecast things that plugs into my tv for $35.
Chromecast is pretty cool but you still need a tablet or smartphone to use it. Roku 3 and Apple TV are a bit more convenient even if they cost more.
I assume he wants the console to do some light gaming. If you're not doing that, it's pointless to spend $400 on just a media player. You can even build a basic HTPC for less than that.
Part of the reason I left the xbox one in the living room and moved the ps4 to my bedroom. I mainly game on the ps4 and if there is something to watch I use the Xbox one. But I also game on both systems either way at times. Supposedly the ps4 is suppose to get an update to let it do dlna but who knows when.Xbox One. PS4 can't run jack shit in terms of files and I hope Sony is losing sales because of it. It does annoy me about my PS4 that it still can't play a damn MP4 file. It's ridiculous actually.
Other than blu-ray support, my amazon fire tv stick, which costs about 1/10th the price of the pS4 is much superior for playing media. Isn't that pathetic? And it's true.
You already have a PS3? Why not try that first?
My TV alone has dozens of video streaming services